Add dbgStats metrics
Add dbgStats metrics to analyze number of Hashes, db Gets, and db Puts.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 8.841700 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.044k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 7.678766 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.044k, dbGet: 199, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.401087 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.044k, dbGet: 207, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 2.466346 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 33.884k, dbGet: 30.697k, dbPut: 33.889k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 1.958160 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 41.419k, dbGet: 37.558k, dbPut: 41.874k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.089858449s
dbgStats(hash: 825.285k, dbGet: 788.869k, dbPut: 925.285k)
AddBatch: 904.647829ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.458k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.463k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.915k, dbGet: 134.602k, dbPut: 161.915k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.528k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.533k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 115.506k, dbGet: 97.482k, dbPut: 115.516k)
```
3 years ago Add dbgStats metrics
Add dbgStats metrics to analyze number of Hashes, db Gets, and db Puts.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 8.841700 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.044k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 7.678766 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.044k, dbGet: 199, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.401087 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.044k, dbGet: 207, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 2.466346 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 33.884k, dbGet: 30.697k, dbPut: 33.889k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 1.958160 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 41.419k, dbGet: 37.558k, dbPut: 41.874k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.089858449s
dbgStats(hash: 825.285k, dbGet: 788.869k, dbPut: 925.285k)
AddBatch: 904.647829ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.458k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.463k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.915k, dbGet: 134.602k, dbPut: 161.915k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.528k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.533k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 115.506k, dbGet: 97.482k, dbPut: 115.516k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago Add dbgStats metrics
Add dbgStats metrics to analyze number of Hashes, db Gets, and db Puts.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 8.841700 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.044k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 7.678766 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.044k, dbGet: 199, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.401087 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.044k, dbGet: 207, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 2.466346 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 33.884k, dbGet: 30.697k, dbPut: 33.889k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 1.958160 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 41.419k, dbGet: 37.558k, dbPut: 41.874k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.089858449s
dbgStats(hash: 825.285k, dbGet: 788.869k, dbPut: 925.285k)
AddBatch: 904.647829ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.458k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.463k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.915k, dbGet: 134.602k, dbPut: 161.915k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.528k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.533k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 115.506k, dbGet: 97.482k, dbPut: 115.516k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago Add dbgStats metrics
Add dbgStats metrics to analyze number of Hashes, db Gets, and db Puts.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 8.841700 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.044k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 7.678766 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.044k, dbGet: 199, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.401087 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.044k, dbGet: 207, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 2.466346 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 33.884k, dbGet: 30.697k, dbPut: 33.889k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 1.958160 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 41.419k, dbGet: 37.558k, dbPut: 41.874k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.089858449s
dbgStats(hash: 825.285k, dbGet: 788.869k, dbPut: 925.285k)
AddBatch: 904.647829ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.458k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.463k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.915k, dbGet: 134.602k, dbPut: 161.915k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.528k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.533k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 115.506k, dbGet: 97.482k, dbPut: 115.516k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago Add dbgStats metrics
Add dbgStats metrics to analyze number of Hashes, db Gets, and db Puts.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 8.841700 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.044k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 7.678766 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.044k, dbGet: 199, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.401087 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.044k, dbGet: 207, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 2.466346 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 33.884k, dbGet: 30.697k, dbPut: 33.889k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 1.958160 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 41.419k, dbGet: 37.558k, dbPut: 41.874k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.089858449s
dbgStats(hash: 825.285k, dbGet: 788.869k, dbPut: 925.285k)
AddBatch: 904.647829ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.458k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.463k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.915k, dbGet: 134.602k, dbPut: 161.915k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.528k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.533k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 115.506k, dbGet: 97.482k, dbPut: 115.516k)
```
3 years ago AddBatch implement using VirtualTree.AddBatch
Reduces the num of hashes, dbGet and dbPut on cases D & E.
Current benchmarks:
```
CASE A, AddBatch was 9.101855 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE B, AddBatch was 8.244078 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 198, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE C, AddBatch was 8.511131 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 1024, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 2.047k, dbGet: 202, dbPut: 2.049k)
CASE D, AddBatch was 8.565696 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 8.191k, dbGet: 1.800k, dbPut: 8.193k)
CASE E, AddBatch was 8.970056 times faster than without AddBatch
nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 4096, hash: Poseidon, db: memory
dbgStats(hash: 10.409k, dbGet: 2.668k, dbPut: 10.861k)
TestAddBatchBench: nCPU: 4, nLeafs: 50000, hash: Blake2b, db: leveldb
Add loop: 10.616145533s
dbgStats(hash: 824.884k, dbGet: 788.975k, dbPut: 924.884k)
AddBatch: 942.34815ms
dbgStats(hash: 122.051k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 122.053k)
TestDbgStats
add in loop dbgStats(hash: 141.911k, dbGet: 134.650k, dbPut: 161.911k)
addbatch caseA dbgStats(hash: 24.522k, dbGet: 1, dbPut: 24.524k)
addbatch caseD dbgStats(hash: 26.985k, dbGet: 2.465k, dbPut: 26.989k)
```
3 years ago |
|
// Package arbo > vt.go implements the Virtual Tree, which computes a tree
// without computing any hash. With the idea of once all the leafs are placed in
// their positions, the hashes can be computed, avoiding computing a node hash
// more than one time.
package arbo
import ( "bytes" "encoding/hex" "fmt" "io" "math" "runtime" "sync" )
type node struct { l *node r *node k []byte v []byte path []bool h []byte }
type params struct { maxLevels int hashFunction HashFunction emptyHash []byte dbg *dbgStats }
type kv struct { pos int // original position in the inputted array
keyPath []byte k []byte v []byte }
func (p *params) keysValuesToKvs(ks, vs [][]byte) ([]kv, error) { if len(ks) != len(vs) { return nil, fmt.Errorf("len(keys)!=len(values) (%d!=%d)", len(ks), len(vs)) } kvs := make([]kv, len(ks)) for i := 0; i < len(ks); i++ { keyPath := make([]byte, p.hashFunction.Len()) copy(keyPath[:], ks[i]) kvs[i].pos = i kvs[i].keyPath = keyPath kvs[i].k = ks[i] kvs[i].v = vs[i] }
return kvs, nil }
// vt stands for virtual tree. It's a tree that does not have any computed hash
// while placing the leafs. Once all the leafs are placed, it computes all the
// hashes. In this way, each node hash is only computed one time (at the end)
// and the tree is computed in memory.
type vt struct { root *node params *params }
func newVT(maxLevels int, hash HashFunction) vt { return vt{ root: nil, params: ¶ms{ maxLevels: maxLevels, hashFunction: hash, emptyHash: make([]byte, hash.Len()), // empty
}, } }
// addBatch adds a batch of key-values to the VirtualTree. Returns an array
// containing the indexes of the keys failed to add. Does not include the
// computation of hashes of the nodes neither the storage of the key-values of
// the tree into the db. After addBatch, vt.computeHashes should be called to
// compute the hashes of all the nodes of the tree.
func (t *vt) addBatch(ks, vs [][]byte) ([]int, error) { nCPU := flp2(runtime.NumCPU()) if nCPU == 1 || len(ks) < nCPU { var invalids []int for i := 0; i < len(ks); i++ { if err := t.add(0, ks[i], vs[i]); err != nil { invalids = append(invalids, i) } } return invalids, nil }
l := int(math.Log2(float64(nCPU)))
kvs, err := t.params.keysValuesToKvs(ks, vs) if err != nil { return nil, err }
buckets := splitInBuckets(kvs, nCPU)
nodesAtL, err := t.getNodesAtLevel(l) if err != nil { return nil, err } if len(nodesAtL) != nCPU && t.root != nil { /* Already populated Tree but Unbalanced - Need to fill M1 and M2, and then will be able to continue with the flow - Search for M1 & M2 in the inputed Keys - Add M1 & M2 to the Tree - From here can continue with the flow
R / \ / \ / \ * * | \ | \ | \ L: M1 * M2 * (where M1 and M2 are empty) / | / / | / / | / A * * / \ | \ / \ | \ / \ | \ B * * C / \ |\ ... ... | \ | \ D E */
// add one key at each bucket, and then continue with the flow
for i := 0; i < len(buckets); i++ { // add one leaf of the bucket, if there is an error when
// adding the k-v, try to add the next one of the bucket
// (until one is added)
inserted := -1 for j := 0; j < len(buckets[i]); j++ { if err := t.add(0, buckets[i][j].k, buckets[i][j].v); err == nil { inserted = j break } }
// remove the inserted element from buckets[i]
if inserted != -1 { buckets[i] = append(buckets[i][:inserted], buckets[i][inserted+1:]...) } } nodesAtL, err = t.getNodesAtLevel(l) if err != nil { return nil, err } } if len(nodesAtL) != nCPU { return nil, fmt.Errorf("This error should not be reached."+ " len(nodesAtL) != nCPU, len(nodesAtL)=%d, nCPU=%d."+ " Please report it in a new issue:"+ " https://github.com/vocdoni/arbo/issues/new", len(nodesAtL), nCPU) }
subRoots := make([]*node, nCPU) invalidsInBucket := make([][]int, nCPU)
var wg sync.WaitGroup wg.Add(nCPU) for i := 0; i < nCPU; i++ { go func(cpu int) { bucketVT := newVT(t.params.maxLevels, t.params.hashFunction) bucketVT.root = nodesAtL[cpu] for j := 0; j < len(buckets[cpu]); j++ { if err = bucketVT.add(l, buckets[cpu][j].k, buckets[cpu][j].v); err != nil { invalidsInBucket[cpu] = append(invalidsInBucket[cpu], buckets[cpu][j].pos) } } subRoots[cpu] = bucketVT.root wg.Done() }(i) } wg.Wait()
var invalids []int for i := 0; i < len(invalidsInBucket); i++ { invalids = append(invalids, invalidsInBucket[i]...) }
newRootNode, err := upFromNodes(subRoots) if err != nil { return nil, err } t.root = newRootNode
return invalids, nil }
func (t *vt) getNodesAtLevel(l int) ([]*node, error) { if t.root == nil { var r []*node nChilds := int(math.Pow(2, float64(l))) //nolint:gomnd
for i := 0; i < nChilds; i++ { r = append(r, nil) } return r, nil } return t.root.getNodesAtLevel(0, l) }
func (n *node) getNodesAtLevel(currLvl, l int) ([]*node, error) { if n == nil { var r []*node nChilds := int(math.Pow(2, float64(l-currLvl))) //nolint:gomnd
for i := 0; i < nChilds; i++ { r = append(r, nil) } return r, nil }
typ := n.typ() if currLvl == l && typ != vtEmpty { return []*node{n}, nil } if currLvl >= l { return nil, fmt.Errorf("This error should not be reached."+ " currLvl >= l, currLvl=%d, l=%d."+ " Please report it in a new issue:"+ " https://github.com/vocdoni/arbo/issues/new", currLvl, l) }
var nodes []*node
nodesL, err := n.l.getNodesAtLevel(currLvl+1, l) if err != nil { return nil, err } nodes = append(nodes, nodesL...)
nodesR, err := n.r.getNodesAtLevel(currLvl+1, l) if err != nil { return nil, err } nodes = append(nodes, nodesR...)
return nodes, nil }
// upFromNodes builds the tree from the bottom to up
func upFromNodes(ns []*node) (*node, error) { if len(ns) == 1 { return ns[0], nil }
var res []*node for i := 0; i < len(ns); i += 2 { if (ns[i].typ() == vtEmpty && ns[i+1].typ() == vtEmpty) || (ns[i].typ() == vtLeaf && ns[i+1].typ() == vtEmpty) { // when both sub nodes are empty, the parent is also empty
// or
// when 1st sub node is a leaf but the 2nd is empty, the
// leaf is used as parent
res = append(res, ns[i]) continue } if ns[i].typ() == vtEmpty && ns[i+1].typ() == vtLeaf { // when 2nd sub node is a leaf but the 1st is empty, the
// leaf is used as 'parent'
res = append(res, ns[i+1]) continue } n := &node{ l: ns[i], r: ns[i+1], } res = append(res, n) } return upFromNodes(res) }
// add adds a key&value as a leaf in the VirtualTree
func (t *vt) add(fromLvl int, k, v []byte) error { leaf := newLeafNode(t.params, k, v) if t.root == nil { t.root = leaf return nil }
if err := t.root.add(t.params, fromLvl, leaf); err != nil { return err }
return nil }
// computeHashes should be called after all the vt.add is used, once all the
// leafs are in the tree. Computes the hashes of the tree, parallelizing in the
// available CPUs.
func (t *vt) computeHashes() ([][2][]byte, error) { var err error
nCPU := flp2(runtime.NumCPU()) l := int(math.Log2(float64(nCPU))) nodesAtL, err := t.getNodesAtLevel(l) if err != nil { return nil, err } subRoots := make([]*node, nCPU) bucketPairs := make([][][2][]byte, nCPU) dbgStatsPerBucket := make([]*dbgStats, nCPU) errs := make([]error, nCPU)
var wg sync.WaitGroup wg.Add(nCPU) for i := 0; i < nCPU; i++ { go func(cpu int) { bucketVT := newVT(t.params.maxLevels-l, t.params.hashFunction) bucketVT.params.dbg = newDbgStats() bucketVT.root = nodesAtL[cpu]
bucketPairs[cpu], err = bucketVT.root.computeHashes(l, t.params.maxLevels, bucketVT.params, bucketPairs[cpu]) if err != nil { errs[cpu] = err }
subRoots[cpu] = bucketVT.root dbgStatsPerBucket[cpu] = bucketVT.params.dbg wg.Done() }(i) } wg.Wait()
for i := 0; i < len(errs); i++ { if errs[i] != nil { return nil, errs[i] } }
for i := 0; i < len(dbgStatsPerBucket); i++ { t.params.dbg.add(dbgStatsPerBucket[i]) }
var pairs [][2][]byte for i := 0; i < len(bucketPairs); i++ { pairs = append(pairs, bucketPairs[i]...) }
nodesAtL, err = t.getNodesAtLevel(l) if err != nil { return nil, err } for i := 0; i < len(nodesAtL); i++ { nodesAtL = subRoots }
pairs, err = t.root.computeHashes(0, l, t.params, pairs) if err != nil { return nil, err }
return pairs, nil }
func newLeafNode(p *params, k, v []byte) *node { keyPath := make([]byte, p.hashFunction.Len()) copy(keyPath[:], k) path := getPath(p.maxLevels, keyPath) n := &node{ k: k, v: v, path: path, } return n }
type virtualNodeType int
const ( vtEmpty = 0 // for convenience uses same value that PrefixValueEmpty
vtLeaf = 1 // for convenience uses same value that PrefixValueLeaf
vtMid = 2 // for convenience uses same value that PrefixValueIntermediate
)
func (n *node) typ() virtualNodeType { if n == nil { return vtEmpty } if n.l == nil && n.r == nil && n.k != nil { return vtLeaf } if n.l != nil || n.r != nil { return vtMid } return vtEmpty }
func (n *node) add(p *params, currLvl int, leaf *node) error { if currLvl > p.maxLevels-1 { return ErrMaxVirtualLevel }
if n == nil { // n = leaf // TMP!
return nil }
t := n.typ() switch t { case vtMid: if leaf.path[currLvl] { //right
if n.r == nil { // empty sub-node, add the leaf here
n.r = leaf return nil } if err := n.r.add(p, currLvl+1, leaf); err != nil { return err } } else { if n.l == nil { // empty sub-node, add the leaf here
n.l = leaf return nil } if err := n.l.add(p, currLvl+1, leaf); err != nil { return err } } case vtLeaf: if bytes.Equal(n.k, leaf.k) { return fmt.Errorf("%s. Existing node: %s, trying to add node: %s", ErrKeyAlreadyExists, hex.EncodeToString(n.k), hex.EncodeToString(leaf.k)) }
oldLeaf := &node{ k: n.k, v: n.v, path: n.path, } // remove values from current node (converting it to mid node)
n.k = nil n.v = nil n.h = nil n.path = nil if err := n.downUntilDivergence(p, currLvl, oldLeaf, leaf); err != nil { return err } case vtEmpty: return fmt.Errorf("virtual tree node.add() with empty node %v", n) default: return fmt.Errorf("virtual tree node.add() with unknown node type %v", n) }
return nil }
func (n *node) downUntilDivergence(p *params, currLvl int, oldLeaf, newLeaf *node) error { if currLvl > p.maxLevels-1 { return ErrMaxVirtualLevel }
if oldLeaf.path[currLvl] != newLeaf.path[currLvl] { // reached divergence in next level
if newLeaf.path[currLvl] { n.l = oldLeaf n.r = newLeaf } else { n.l = newLeaf n.r = oldLeaf } return nil } // no divergence yet, continue going down
if newLeaf.path[currLvl] { // right
n.r = &node{} if err := n.r.downUntilDivergence(p, currLvl+1, oldLeaf, newLeaf); err != nil { return err } } else { // left
n.l = &node{} if err := n.l.downUntilDivergence(p, currLvl+1, oldLeaf, newLeaf); err != nil { return err } }
return nil }
func splitInBuckets(kvs []kv, nBuckets int) [][]kv { buckets := make([][]kv, nBuckets) // 1. classify the keyvalues into buckets
for i := 0; i < len(kvs); i++ { pair := kvs[i]
// bucketnum := keyToBucket(pair.k, nBuckets)
bucketnum := keyToBucket(pair.keyPath, nBuckets) buckets[bucketnum] = append(buckets[bucketnum], pair) } return buckets }
// TODO rename in a more 'real' name (calculate bucket from/for key)
func keyToBucket(k []byte, nBuckets int) int { nLevels := int(math.Log2(float64(nBuckets))) b := make([]int, nBuckets) for i := 0; i < nBuckets; i++ { b[i] = i } r := b mid := len(r) / 2 //nolint:gomnd
for i := 0; i < nLevels; i++ { if int(k[i/8]&(1<<(i%8))) != 0 { r = r[mid:] mid = len(r) / 2 //nolint:gomnd
} else { r = r[:mid] mid = len(r) / 2 //nolint:gomnd
} } return r[0] }
// flp2 computes the floor power of 2, the highest power of 2 under the given
// value.
func flp2(n int) int { res := 0 for i := n; i >= 1; i-- { if (i & (i - 1)) == 0 { res = i break } } return res }
// computeHashes computes the hashes under the node from which is called the
// method. Returns an array of key-values to store in the db
func (n *node) computeHashes(currLvl, maxLvl int, p *params, pairs [][2][]byte) ( [][2][]byte, error) { if n == nil || currLvl >= maxLvl { // no need to compute any hash
return pairs, nil } if pairs == nil { pairs = [][2][]byte{} } var err error t := n.typ() switch t { case vtLeaf: p.dbg.incHash() leafKey, leafValue, err := newLeafValue(p.hashFunction, n.k, n.v) if err != nil { return pairs, err } n.h = leafKey kv := [2][]byte{leafKey, leafValue} pairs = append(pairs, kv) case vtMid: if n.l != nil { pairs, err = n.l.computeHashes(currLvl+1, maxLvl, p, pairs) if err != nil { return pairs, err } } else { n.l = &node{ h: p.emptyHash, } } if n.r != nil { pairs, err = n.r.computeHashes(currLvl+1, maxLvl, p, pairs) if err != nil { return pairs, err } } else { n.r = &node{ h: p.emptyHash, } } // once the sub nodes are computed, can compute the current node
// hash
p.dbg.incHash() k, v, err := newIntermediate(p.hashFunction, n.l.h, n.r.h) if err != nil { return nil, err } n.h = k kv := [2][]byte{k, v} pairs = append(pairs, kv) case vtEmpty: default: return nil, fmt.Errorf("error: n.computeHashes type (%d) no match", t) }
return pairs, nil }
//nolint:unused
func (t *vt) graphviz(w io.Writer) error { fmt.Fprintf(w, `digraph hierarchy { node [fontname=Monospace,fontsize=10,shape=box] `) if _, err := t.root.graphviz(w, t.params, 0); err != nil { return err } fmt.Fprintf(w, "}\n") return nil }
//nolint:unused
func (n *node) graphviz(w io.Writer, p *params, nEmpties int) (int, error) { if n == nil { return nEmpties, nil }
t := n.typ() switch t { case vtLeaf: leafKey, _, err := newLeafValue(p.hashFunction, n.k, n.v) if err != nil { return nEmpties, err } fmt.Fprintf(w, "\"%p\" [style=filled,label=\"%v\"];\n", n, hex.EncodeToString(leafKey[:nChars]))
k := n.k v := n.v if len(n.k) >= nChars { k = n.k[:nChars] } if len(n.v) >= nChars { v = n.v[:nChars] }
fmt.Fprintf(w, "\"%p\" -> {\"k:%v\\nv:%v\"}\n", n, hex.EncodeToString(k), hex.EncodeToString(v)) fmt.Fprintf(w, "\"k:%v\\nv:%v\" [style=dashed]\n", hex.EncodeToString(k), hex.EncodeToString(v)) case vtMid: fmt.Fprintf(w, "\"%p\" [label=\"\"];\n", n)
lStr := fmt.Sprintf("%p", n.l) rStr := fmt.Sprintf("%p", n.r) eStr := "" if n.l == nil { lStr = fmt.Sprintf("empty%v", nEmpties) eStr += fmt.Sprintf("\"%v\" [style=dashed,label=0];\n", lStr) nEmpties++ } if n.r == nil { rStr = fmt.Sprintf("empty%v", nEmpties) eStr += fmt.Sprintf("\"%v\" [style=dashed,label=0];\n", rStr) nEmpties++ } fmt.Fprintf(w, "\"%p\" -> {\"%v\" \"%v\"}\n", n, lStr, rStr) fmt.Fprint(w, eStr) nEmpties, err := n.l.graphviz(w, p, nEmpties) if err != nil { return nEmpties, err } nEmpties, err = n.r.graphviz(w, p, nEmpties) if err != nil { return nEmpties, err }
case vtEmpty: default: return nEmpties, fmt.Errorf("ERR") }
return nEmpties, nil }
//nolint:unused
func (t *vt) printGraphviz() error { w := bytes.NewBufferString("") fmt.Fprintf(w, "--------\nGraphviz:\n") err := t.graphviz(w) if err != nil { fmt.Println(w) return err } fmt.Fprintf(w, "End of Graphviz --------\n") fmt.Println(w) return nil }
|