Update fees usage in Til

test/til/README.md

@@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ CreateAccountDeposit(1) A: 50
 
 // create the account of TokenID=1 for the user B, deposit of TokenID=1, on the
 // account of tokenID=1 for the user B, of an amount of 40 units and atomically
-// transfer 10 units to account of tokenID=1 for the user A, paying a fee of 2
-CreateAccountDepositTransfer(1) B-A: 40, 10 (2)
+// transfer 10 units to account of tokenID=1 for the user A
+CreateAccountDepositTransfer(1) B-A: 40, 10
 
 // transaction generated by the Coordinator, create account for user User0 for
 // the TokenID=2, with a deposit of 0
@@ -40,20 +40,20 @@ Deposit(1) A: 6
 
 // deposit of TokenID=1, on the account of tokenID=1 for the user B, of an
 // amount of 6 units and atomically transfer 10 units to account of tokenID=1 for
-// the user A, paying a fee of 2
-DepositTransfer(1) B-A: 6, 4 (2)
+// the user A
+DepositTransfer(1) B-A: 6, 4
 
 // transfer of TokenID=1, from the account A to B (for that token), of 6 units,
 // paying a fee of 3. Transaction will be a L2Tx
 Transfer(1) A-B: 6 (3)
 
-// exit of TokenID=1, from the account A (for that token), of 5 units.
-// Transaction will be a L2Tx
-Exit(1) A: 5
+// exit of TokenID=1, from the account A (for that token), of 5 units, paying a
+// fee of 1. Transaction will be a L2Tx
+Exit(1) A: 5 (1)
 
 // force-transfer of TokenID=1, from the account A to B (for that token), of 6
-// units, paying a fee of 3. Transaction will be L1UserTx of ForceTransfer type
-ForceTransfer(1) A-B: 6 (3)
+// units. Transaction will be L1UserTx of ForceTransfer type
+ForceTransfer(1) A-B: 6
 
 // force-exit of TokenID=1, from the account A (for that token), of 5 units.
 // Transaction will be L1UserTx of ForceExit type
@@ -79,8 +79,9 @@ Type: PoolL2
 // paying a fee of 4
 PoolTransfer(1) A-B: 6 (4)
 
-// exit of TokenID=1, from the account A (for that token), of 3 units
-PoolExit(1) A: 3
+// exit of TokenID=1, from the account A (for that token), of 3 units, paying a
+// fee of 1
+PoolExit(1) A: 3 (1)
 ```
 
 ## Usage

test/til/lang.go

@@ -332,6 +332,7 @@ func (p *parser) parseLine(setType setType) (*instruction, error) {
 		return c, fmt.Errorf("Set type not defined")
 	}
 	transferring := false
+	fee := false
 
 	if setType == setTypeBlockchain {
 		switch lit {
@@ -339,9 +340,11 @@ func (p *parser) parseLine(setType setType) (*instruction, error) {
 			c.typ = common.TxTypeDeposit
 		case "Exit":
 			c.typ = common.TxTypeExit
+			fee = true
 		case "Transfer":
 			c.typ = common.TxTypeTransfer
 			transferring = true
+			fee = true
 		case "CreateAccountDeposit":
 			c.typ = common.TxTypeCreateAccountDeposit
 		case "CreateAccountDepositTransfer":
@@ -355,6 +358,7 @@ func (p *parser) parseLine(setType setType) (*instruction, error) {
 			transferring = true
 		case "ForceTransfer":
 			c.typ = common.TxTypeForceTransfer
+			transferring = true
 		case "ForceExit":
 			c.typ = common.TxTypeForceExit
 		default:
@@ -365,14 +369,18 @@ func (p *parser) parseLine(setType setType) (*instruction, error) {
 		case "PoolTransfer":
 			c.typ = common.TxTypeTransfer
 			transferring = true
+			fee = true
 		case "PoolTransferToEthAddr":
 			c.typ = common.TxTypeTransferToEthAddr
 			transferring = true
+			fee = true
 		case "PoolTransferToBJJ":
 			c.typ = common.TxTypeTransferToBJJ
 			transferring = true
+			fee = true
 		case "PoolExit":
 			c.typ = common.TxTypeExit
+			fee = true
 		default:
 			return c, fmt.Errorf("Unexpected PoolL2 tx type: %s", lit)
 		}
@@ -450,7 +458,7 @@ func (p *parser) parseLine(setType setType) (*instruction, error) {
 	} else {
 		c.amount = uint64(amount)
 	}
-	if transferring {
+	if fee {
 		if err := p.expectChar(c, "("); err != nil {
 			return c, err
 		}

test/til/lang_test.go

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ func TestParseBlockchainTxs(t *testing.T) {
 		Deposit(2) A: 20
 		Deposit(1) B: 5
 		CreateAccountDeposit(1) C: 5
-		CreateAccountDepositTransfer(1) D-A: 15, 10 (3)
+		CreateAccountDepositTransfer(1) D-A: 15, 10
 		CreateAccountDepositCoordinator(1) E
 
 		// L2 transactions
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ func TestParseBlockchainTxs(t *testing.T) {
 		> batch
 		AddToken(3)
 
-		DepositTransfer(1) A-B: 15, 10 (1)
+		DepositTransfer(1) A-B: 15, 10
 		Transfer(1) C-A : 3 (1)
 		Transfer(2) A-B: 15 (1)
 
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ func TestParseBlockchainTxs(t *testing.T) {
 		> block
 
 		// Exits
-		Exit(1) A: 5
+		Exit(1) A: 5 (1)
 	`
 
 	parser := newParser(strings.NewReader(s))
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ func TestParseBlockchainTxs(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.Equal(t, txTypeCreateAccountDepositCoordinator, instructions.instructions[7].typ)
 	assert.Equal(t, typeNewBatch, instructions.instructions[11].typ)
 	assert.Equal(t, "Deposit(1)User0:20", instructions.instructions[16].raw())
-	assert.Equal(t, "Type: DepositTransfer, From: A, To: B, LoadAmount: 15, Amount: 10, Fee: 1, TokenID: 1\n", instructions.instructions[13].String())
+	assert.Equal(t, "Type: DepositTransfer, From: A, To: B, LoadAmount: 15, Amount: 10, Fee: 0, TokenID: 1\n", instructions.instructions[13].String())
 	assert.Equal(t, "Type: Transfer, From: User1, To: User0, Amount: 15, Fee: 1, TokenID: 3\n", instructions.instructions[19].String())
 	assert.Equal(t, "Transfer(2)A-B:15(1)", instructions.instructions[15].raw())
 	assert.Equal(t, "Type: Transfer, From: A, To: B, Amount: 15, Fee: 1, TokenID: 2\n", instructions.instructions[15].String())
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ func TestParsePoolTxs(t *testing.T) {
 		PoolTransfer(2) A-B: 3 (3)
 		PoolTransfer(1) B-D: 3 (1)
 		PoolTransfer(1) C-D: 3 (1)
-		PoolExit(1) A: 5
+		PoolExit(1) A: 5 (1)
 	`
 
 	parser := newParser(strings.NewReader(s))

test/til/sets.go

@@ -130,10 +130,10 @@ Transfer(1) Y-E: 5 (1)
 Transfer(1) Z-A: 5 (1)
 // exits
 ForceExit(1) A: 5
-Exit(1) K: 5
-Exit(1) X: 5
-Exit(1) Y: 5
-Exit(1) Z: 5
+Exit(1) K: 5 (1)
+Exit(1) X: 5 (1)
+Exit(1) Y: 5 (1)
+Exit(1) Z: 5 (1)
 
 > batch
 
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ Transfer(1) B-N: 5 (1)
 Transfer(1) C-O: 5 (1)
 Transfer(1) H-O: 5 (1)
 Transfer(1) I-H: 5 (1)
-Exit(1) A: 5
+Exit(1) A: 5 (1)
 
 // create CoordinatorTx CreateAccount for D, TokenId 2, used at SetPool0 for 'PoolTransfer(2) B-D: 3 (1)'
 CreateAccountDepositCoordinator(2) D
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ PoolTransfer(1) C-A: 3 (1)
 PoolTransfer(1) A-B: 1 (1)
 PoolTransfer(2) A-B: 15 (1)
 PoolTransfer(2) B-D: 3 (1)
-PoolExit(1) A: 3
+PoolExit(1) A: 3 (1)
 PoolTransfer(1) A-B: 6 (1)
 PoolTransfer(1) B-C: 3 (1)
 PoolTransfer(1) A-C: 3 (1)

test/til/txs_test.go

@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ func TestGenerateBlocks(t *testing.T) {
 		> batchL1 // batchNum = 1
 		> batchL1 // batchNum = 2
 
-		CreateAccountDepositTransfer(1) F-A: 15, 10 (3)
+		CreateAccountDepositTransfer(1) F-A: 15, 10
 
 		Transfer(1) A-B: 6 (1)
 		Transfer(1) B-D: 3 (1)
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ func TestGenerateBlocks(t *testing.T) {
 		CreateAccountDepositCoordinator(1) E
 		CreateAccountDepositCoordinator(2) B
 
-		DepositTransfer(1) A-B: 15, 10 (1)
+		DepositTransfer(1) A-B: 15, 10
 		Transfer(1) C-A : 3 (1)
 		Transfer(2) A-B: 15 (1)
 		Transfer(1) A-E: 1 (1)
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ func TestGenerateBlocks(t *testing.T) {
 
 		// Exits
 		Transfer(1) A-B: 1 (1)
-		Exit(1) A: 5
+		Exit(1) A: 5 (1)
 		
 		> batch // batchNum = 6
 		> block
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ func TestGeneratePoolL2Txs(t *testing.T) {
 		PoolTransfer(1) User0-User1: 15 (1)
 		PoolTransfer(3) User1-User0: 15 (1)
 		PoolTransfer(2) B-D: 3 (1)
-		PoolExit(1) A: 3
+		PoolExit(1) A: 3 (1)
 		PoolTransferToEthAddr(1) A-B: 1 (1)
 		PoolTransferToBJJ(1) A-B: 1 (1)
 	`
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ func TestGenerateErrors(t *testing.T) {
 		Transfer(1) A-B: 6 (1)
 		Transfer(1) A-B: 6 (1) // on purpose this is moving more money that what it has in the account, Til should not fail
 		Transfer(1) B-A: 6 (1)
-		Exit(1) A: 3
+		Exit(1) A: 3 (1)
 		> batch
 	`
 	tc = NewContext(eth.RollupConstMaxL1UserTx)