diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index d70df69..3bf37e1 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -15,5 +15,6 @@ Notes, code and documents done while reading books and papers.
 - [Notes on Spartan](notes_spartan.pdf)
 - [Notes on Nova](notes_nova.pdf)
 - [Notes on HyperNova](notes_hypernova.pdf)
+- [Notes on NTT](notes_ntt.pdf)
 
 Also some Sage implementations can be found in the `*.sage` files of this repo.
diff --git a/notes_ntt.pdf b/notes_ntt.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..28dda1f
Binary files /dev/null and b/notes_ntt.pdf differ
diff --git a/notes_ntt.tex b/notes_ntt.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b8eec0b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/notes_ntt.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,290 @@
+\documentclass{article}
+\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
+\usepackage{amsfonts}
+\usepackage{amsthm}
+\usepackage{amsmath}
+\usepackage{enumerate}
+
+\usepackage{hyperref}
+\hypersetup{
+    colorlinks,
+    citecolor=black,
+    filecolor=black,
+    linkcolor=black,
+    urlcolor=blue
+}
+
+
+\newcommand{\Zq}{\mathbb{Z}_q}
+\newcommand{\Rq}{\mathbb{Z}_q[X]/(X^n+1)}
+
+
+\title{NTT for Negacyclic Polynomial Multiplication}
+\author{arnaucube}
+\date{January 2025}
+
+\begin{document}
+
+\maketitle
+
+\begin{abstract}
+    Notes taken while studying the NTT, mostly from \cite{10177902}.
+
+	Usually while reading books and papers I take handwritten notes in a notebook, this document contains some of them re-written to $LaTeX$.
+
+	The notes are not complete, don't include all the steps neither all the proofs.
+
+	An implementation of the NTT can be found at\\
+	\href{https://github.com/arnaucube/fhe-study/blob/main/arithmetic/src/ntt.rs}{https://github.com/arnaucube/fhe-study/blob/main/arithmetic/src/ntt.rs}.
+\end{abstract}
+
+\tableofcontents
+
+\section{Main idea}
+For doing multiplications in the \emph{negacyclic polynomial ring} ($\Rq$), rather than doing it in a naive way, it is more
+efficient to do it through the NTT.
+
+This is, let $a(X), b(X) \in \Rq$, and suppose we want to
+obtain $a(X) \cdot b(X)$. First apply the NTT to the two ring
+elements that we want to multiply,
+$$\hat{a}(X) = NTT(a(X)),~~ \hat{b}(X)=NTT(b(X))$$
+then multiply the result element-wise,
+% $$\hat{c}(X) = \sum \hat{a}_i \cdot \hat{b}_i$$
+$$c= \hat{a} \circ \hat{b}$$
+where $\circ$ means the element-wise vector multiplication in $\Zq$.
+
+Then apply the NTT$^{-1}$ to the result, obtaining the actual value of
+multiplying $a(X) \cdot b(X)$.
+
+\section{Cyclotomic vs Negacyclic}
+
+\subsection{Cyclotomic: \texorpdfstring{$\mathbb{Z}_q[X]/(X^n-1)$}{Zq[X]/(X**n-1)}}
+In the cyclotomic case, the primitive n-th root of unity in $Z_q$ is $w^n \equiv 1 \pmod q$ (and
+$w^k \not\equiv 1 \pmod q ~~ for k<n$)
+
+\subsubsection{NTT based on \texorpdfstring{$w$}{w}}
+NTT of a polynomial $a(X) = \sum a_i X^i$ is defined as $\hat{a} = NTT(a)$,
+where
+$$\hat{a}_j = \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} a_i w^{ij} \pmod q$$
+for each of the $j=0,1,\ldots, n-1$.
+
+We can visualize the NTT operation as
+$$
+NTT(a) =
+\begin{bmatrix}
+w^{0 \cdot 0} & w^{0 \cdot 1} & w^{0 \cdot 2} & \ldots & w^{0 \cdot (n-1)} \\
+w^{1 \cdot 0} & w^{1 \cdot 1} & w^{1 \cdot 2} & \ldots & w^{1 \cdot (n-1)} \\
+w^{2 \cdot 0} & w^{2 \cdot 1} & w^{2 \cdot 2} & \ldots & w^{2 \cdot (n-1)} \\
+\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & & \vdots\\
+w^{(n-1) \cdot 0} & w^{(n-1) \cdot 1} & w^{(n-1) \cdot 2} & \ldots & w^{(n-1) \cdot (n-1)} \\
+\end{bmatrix}
+\begin{bmatrix}
+a_0 \\ a_1 \\ a_2 \\ \vdots \\ a_{n-1}
+\end{bmatrix}
+=
+\begin{bmatrix}
+\hat{a}_0 \\ \hat{a}_1 \\ \hat{a}_2 \\ \vdots \\ \hat{a}_{n-1}
+\end{bmatrix}
+$$
+
+\subsubsection{Inverse NTT based on \texorpdfstring{$w$}{w}}
+Inverse-NTT of a vector $\hat{a}$ is defined as $a = iNTT(\hat{a})$, where
+$$a_i = n^{-1} \sum_{j=0}^{n-1} \hat{a}_j w^{-ij}k \pmod q$$
+with $j=0,1,\ldots,n-1$.
+
+Similar to the NTT formula, only diffs:
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item $w$ is replaced by its inverse in $\Zq$
+    \item $n^{-1}$ scaling factor
+\end{itemize}
+
+We can visualize the NTT$^{-1}$ operation as
+$$
+iNTT(\hat{a}) =
+n^{-1} \cdot
+\begin{bmatrix}
+w^{-0 \cdot 0} & w^{-0 \cdot 1} & w^{-0 \cdot 2} & \ldots & w^{-0 \cdot (n-1)} \\
+w^{-1 \cdot 0} & w^{-1 \cdot 1} & w^{-1 \cdot 2} & \ldots & w^{-1 \cdot (n-1)} \\
+w^{-2 \cdot 0} & w^{-2 \cdot 1} & w^{-2 \cdot 2} & \ldots & w^{-2 \cdot (n-1)} \\
+\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & & \vdots\\
+w^{-(n-1) \cdot 0} & w^{-(n-1) \cdot 1} & w^{-(n-1) \cdot 2} & \ldots & w^{-(n-1) \cdot (n-1)} \\
+\end{bmatrix}
+\begin{bmatrix}
+\hat{a}_0 \\ \hat{a}_1 \\ \hat{a}_2 \\ \vdots \\ \hat{a}_{n-1}
+\end{bmatrix}
+=
+\begin{bmatrix}
+a_0 \\ a_1 \\ a_2 \\ \vdots \\ a_{n-1}
+\end{bmatrix}
+$$
+
+\subsection{Apply it to polynomial multiplication}
+Want to compute $c(X) = a(X) \cdot b(X) \in \mathbb{Z}_q[X] / (X^n-1)$, which we
+can do as
+$$c= iNTT(NTT(a) \circ NTT(b))$$
+where $\circ$ means the element-wise vector multiplication in $\Zq$.
+
+
+
+\subsection{Negacyclic: \texorpdfstring{$\mathbb{Z}_q[X] / (X^n+1)$}{Zq[X]/(X**n+1)}}
+Instead of working in $\mathbb{Z}_q[X] / (X^n-1)$, we work in $\Rq$.
+
+Instead of using the primitive n-th root of unity ($w$), we use the
+\emph{primitive 2n-th root of unity} $\psi$.
+
+Where $\psi^2 \equiv w \pmod q$, and $\psi^2 \equiv -1 \pmod q$.
+
+
+\subsubsection{NTT based on \texorpdfstring{$\psi$}{psi}, NTT\texorpdfstring{$^\psi$}{$**psi$}}
+$\hat{a} = NTT^{\psi}(a)$, where
+
+$$\hat{a}_j = \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} \psi^i w^{ij} a_i \pmod q$$
+with $j=0,1,\ldots,n-1$.
+
+Since $\psi^2 \equiv w \pmod q$, we can substitute $w=\psi^2$:
+
+$$\hat{a}_j = \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} \psi^{2ij+i} a_i \pmod q$$
+
+getting rid of $w$.
+
+We can visualize the NTT$^{\psi}$ operation as
+$$
+NTT^\psi(a) =
+\begin{bmatrix}
+\psi^{2(0 \cdot 0)+0} & \psi^{2(0 \cdot 1)+1} & \psi^{2(0 \cdot 2)+2} & \ldots & \psi^{2(0 \cdot (n-1))+(n-1)} \\
+\psi^{2(1 \cdot 0)+0} & \psi^{2(1 \cdot 1)+1} & \psi^{2(1 \cdot 2)+2} & \ldots & \psi^{2(1 \cdot (n-1))+(n-1)} \\
+\psi^{2(2 \cdot 0)+0} & \psi^{2(2 \cdot 1)+1} & \psi^{2(2 \cdot 2)+2} & \ldots & \psi^{2(2 \cdot (n-1))+(n-1)} \\
+\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & & \vdots\\
+\psi^{2((n-1) \cdot 0)+0} & \psi^{2((n-1) \cdot 1)+1} & \psi^{2((n-1) \cdot 2)+2} & \ldots & \psi^{2((n-1) \cdot (n-1))+(n-1)} \\
+\end{bmatrix}
+\begin{bmatrix}
+a_0 \\ a_1 \\ a_2 \\ \vdots \\ a_{n-1}
+\end{bmatrix}
+=
+\begin{bmatrix}
+\hat{a}_0 \\ \hat{a}_1 \\ \hat{a}_2 \\ \vdots \\ \hat{a}_{n-1}
+\end{bmatrix}
+$$
+
+\subsubsection{Inverse NTT based on \texorpdfstring{$\psi$}{psi}, iNTT\texorpdfstring{$^\psi$}{**psi}}
+$a = iNTT{\psi}(\hat{a})$, where
+$$a_i = n^{-1} \sum_{j=0}^{n-1} \psi^{-j} w^{-ij} \hat{a}_j \pmod q$$
+with $i=0,1,\ldots,n-1$.
+
+Which substituting $w=\psi^2$ we get
+$$a_i = n^{-1} \sum_{j=0}^{n-1} \psi^{-(2ij + j)} \hat{a}_j \pmod q$$
+
+
+So the differences with the NTT$^\psi$ are:
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item $\psi$ is replaced by its inverse $\psi^{-1}$ in $\Zq$
+    \item $n^{-1}$ scaling factor
+    \item transpose of the exponents of $\psi$
+\end{itemize}
+
+We can visualize the NTT$^{-\psi}$ operation as
+
+\begin{align*}
+    &iNTT^{\psi}(a) =\\
+&\begin{bmatrix}
+\psi^{-(2(0 \cdot 0)+0)} & \psi^{-(2(0 \cdot 1)+1)} & \psi^{-(2(0 \cdot 2)+2)} & \ldots & \psi^{-(2(0 \cdot (n-1))+(n-1))} \\
+\psi^{-(2(1 \cdot 0)+0)} & \psi^{-(2(1 \cdot 1)+1)} & \psi^{-(2(1 \cdot 2)+2)} & \ldots & \psi^{-(2(1 \cdot (n-1))+(n-1))} \\
+\psi^{-(2(2 \cdot 0)+0)} & \psi^{-(2(2 \cdot 1)+1)} & \psi^{-(2(2 \cdot 2)+2)} & \ldots & \psi^{-(2(2 \cdot (n-1))+(n-1))} \\
+\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & & \vdots\\
+\psi^{-(2((n-1) \cdot 0)+0)} & \psi^{-(2((n-1) \cdot 1)+1)} & \psi^{-(2((n-1) \cdot 2)+2)} & \ldots & \psi^{-(2((n-1) \cdot (n-1))+(n-1))} \\
+\end{bmatrix}
+\begin{bmatrix}
+\hat{a}_0 \\ \hat{a}_1 \\ \hat{a}_2 \\ \vdots \\ \hat{a}_{n-1}
+\end{bmatrix}
+=
+\begin{bmatrix}
+a_0 \\ a_1 \\ a_2 \\ \vdots \\ a_{n-1}
+\end{bmatrix}
+\end{align*}
+
+\subsection{Use it to polynomial multiplication}
+Want to compute $c(X) = a(X) \cdot b(X) \in \mathbb{Z}_q[X] / (X^n-1)$, which we
+can do as
+$$c= iNTT^{\psi 1}(NTT^{\psi}(a) \circ NTT^{\psi}(b))$$
+where $\circ$ means the element-wise vector multiplication in $\Zq$.
+
+\section{Fast NTT}
+NTT and INTT have $O(n^2)$ complexity, but since NTT is the DFT in a ring, we
+can apply the DFT optimization techniques (FFT), to reduce the complexity to
+$O(n log n)$.
+
+We use two properties of $\psi$:
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item periodicity: $\psi^{k+2n} = \psi^k$
+    \item symmetry: $\psi^{k+n} = - \psi^k$
+\end{itemize}
+
+\subsection{Cooley-Tukey algorithm (Fast NTT)}\label{sec:CT}
+Recall,
+$$\hat{a}_j = \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} \psi^{2ij+i} a_i \pmod q$$
+we can split it into two parts,
+\begin{align*}
+    \hat{a}_j &=\sum_{i=0}^{n/2 -1} \psi^{4ij+2i} a_{2i} + \sum_{i=0}^{n/2 -1} \psi^{4ij+2j+2i+1} a_{2i+1} \pmod q \\
+	      &=\sum_{i=0}^{n/2 -1} \psi^{4ij+2i} a_{2i} + \psi^{2j+1} \cdot \sum_{i=0}^{n/2-1} \psi^{4ij+2i} a_{2i+1} \pmod q
+\end{align*}
+
+Let
+\begin{align*}
+    A_j &= \sum_{i=0}^{n/2 -1} \psi^{4ij+2i} a_{2i} \pmod q \\
+    B_j &= \sum_{i=0}^{n/2-1} \psi^{4ij+2i} a_{2i+1} \pmod q
+\end{align*}
+
+then,
+\begin{align*}
+    \hat{a}_j &= A_j + \psi^{2j+1} \cdot B_j \pmod q \\
+    \hat{a}_{j+n/2} &= A_j - \psi^{2j+1} \cdot B_j \pmod q
+\end{align*}
+
+Notice that $A_j,~B_j$ can be obtained as $n/2$ points. So if $n$ is a power of
+two, we can repeat the process for all the coefficients.
+
+[todo: diagram and explain intuition]
+
+\subsection{Gentleman-Sande algorithm (Fast iNTT)}
+Instead of dividing the summation by its index parity, it is separated by the
+lower and upper half of the summation.
+
+Similar to what we did in section \ref{sec:CT}, let's split the equation to compute $a_i$.
+
+Recall that we had
+$$a_i = n^{-1} \sum_{j=0}^{n-1} \psi^{-(2ij + j)} \hat{a}_j \pmod q$$
+we can split it into two parts,
+
+\begin{align*}
+    a_i &= n^{-1} \cdot \left[ \sum_{j=0}^{n/2-1} \psi^{-(2i + 1)j} \hat{a}_j 
+    + \sum_{j=0}^{n/2-1} \psi^{-(2i + 1)(j+n/2)} \hat{a}_{j+n/2} \right] \pmod q \\
+	&=  n^{-1} \cdot \psi^{-i} \cdot \left[ \sum_{j=0}^{n/2-1} \psi^{-2ij} \hat{a}_j 
+    + \sum_{j=0}^{n/2-1} \psi^{-2i(j+n/2)} \hat{a}_{j+n/2} \right] \pmod q
+\end{align*}
+
+
+Based on the periodicity and symmetry of $\psi^{-1}$, leaving the $n^{-1}$ factor out, for the even terms:
+\begin{align*}
+    a_{2i} &= \psi^{-2i} \cdot \left[ \sum_{j=0}^{n/2-1} \psi^{-4ij} \hat{a}_j
+	+ \sum_{j=0}^{n/2-1} \psi^{-4i(j+n/2)} \hat{a}_(j+n/2) \right] \pmod q \\
+	   &= \psi^{-2i} \sum_{j=0}^{n/2-1} (\hat{a}_j + \hat{a}_{j+n/2}) \psi^{-4ij} ) \pmod q
+\end{align*}
+
+Doing the same derivation for the odd terms:
+$$a_{2i+1} = \psi^{-2i} \sum_{j=0}^{n/2-1} ( \hat{a}_j - \hat{a}_{j+n/2} ) \psi^{-4ij} \pmod q$$
+
+
+Now, let
+$$A_j = \sum_{j=0}^{n/2-1} \hat{a}_j \psi^{-4ij},~~ B_j = \sum_{j=0}^{n/2-1} \hat{a}_{j +n/2} \psi^{-4ij}$$
+then
+\begin{align*}
+    a_{2i} &= (A_i +B_i) \psi^{-2i} \pmod q\\
+    a_{2i+1} &= (A_i -B_i) \psi^{-2i} \pmod q\\
+\end{align*}
+
+[todo: add diagram and explain intuition]
+
+\bibliography{paper-notes.bib}
+\bibliographystyle{unsrt}
+
+\end{document}
diff --git a/paper-notes.bib b/paper-notes.bib
index d42945b..19cb9b8 100644
--- a/paper-notes.bib
+++ b/paper-notes.bib
@@ -140,3 +140,15 @@
       note = {\url{https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/573}},
       url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/573}
 }
+
+@ARTICLE{10177902,
+  author={Satriawan, Ardianto and Syafalni, Infall and Mareta, Rella and Anshori, Isa and Shalannanda, Wervyan and Barra, Aleams},
+  journal={IEEE Access}, 
+  title={Conceptual Review on Number Theoretic Transform and Comprehensive Review on Its Implementations}, 
+  year={2023},
+  volume={11},
+  number={},
+  pages={70288-70316},
+  keywords={Convolution;Complexity theory;Discrete Fourier transforms;Cryptography;Quantum computing;Homomorphic encryption;Toy manufacturing industry;Quantum computing;Number theoretic transform;post quantum cryptography;homomorphic encryption},
+  doi={10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3294446}
+}
diff --git a/weil-pairing.pdf b/weil-pairing.pdf
index 3786ec7..369a4d9 100644
Binary files a/weil-pairing.pdf and b/weil-pairing.pdf differ
diff --git a/weil-pairing.tex b/weil-pairing.tex
index 4a9ce83..75e9550 100644
--- a/weil-pairing.tex
+++ b/weil-pairing.tex
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
 \maketitle
 
 \begin{abstract}
-  Notes taken from \href{https://sites.google.com/site/matanprasma/artifact}{Matan Prasma} math seminars and also while reading about Bilinear Pairings. Usually while reading papers and books I take handwritten notes, this document contains some of them re-written to $LaTeX$.
+  Notes taken from \href{https://sites.google.com/view/matanprasmashomepage/publications}{Matan Prasma} math seminars and also while reading about Bilinear Pairings. Usually while reading papers and books I take handwritten notes, this document contains some of them re-written to $LaTeX$.
 
 	The notes are not complete, don't include all the steps neither all the proofs. I use these notes to revisit the concepts after some time of reading the topic.
 \end{abstract}