arnaucube
/
miksi-core
mirror of https://github.com/arnaucube/miksi-core.git
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
24 Commits
13 Branches
0 Tags
2.8 MiB
 
 
 
Tree: a756810fc9
Branches Tags
${ item.name }
Create branch ${ searchTerm }
from 'a756810fc9'
${ noResults }
miksi-core/README.md

3.7 KiB
Raw Blame History

miksi Test

From Esperanto, miksi (miks·i): to mingle, to blend, to mix, to shuffle

Ethereum mixer where all the computation & constructions are done offchain and then proved inside a zkSNARK to the Smart Contract (for the deposit and for the withdraw).

This means that the client builds a MerkleTree and makes all the needed computation, and then generates a zk-proof where proves that all the offchain computation is done following all the rules (no leaf deletion, only one leaf addition, correct leaf format). This allows to use only ~325.000 gas for the deposit, and ~308.000 gas for the withdraw.

Warning: This repository is in a very early stage. The current version works, but is not finished and there are some improvements to be added.

WebApp to use miksi-core can be found at https://github.com/arnaucube/miksi-app

Circuits tests

npm run test-circuits

Smart Contracts tests

npm run test-sc

Compile circom circuit & generate Groth16 verifier contract

./compile-circuits.sh

Spec draft

Note: The spec & code is a work in progress, there are some pending works & improvements planned to do, and some diagrams for better explanation.

Deposit

All computation & constructions are done offchain and then proved inside a zkSNARK to the Smart Contract

  • user generates a random secret & nullifier
  • computes the commitment, which is the Poseidon hash: commitment = H(coinCode, amount, secret, nullifier), where:
    • coinCode: code that specifies which currency is being used (0==ETH)
    • amount: the amount to be deposited
    • secret: random, private
    • nullifier: random
  • get all the commitments from the SmartContract
  • build the MerkleTree with the getted commitments
  • add the new computed commitment into the MerkleTree
  • generate zkSNARK proof, where is proving:
    • prover knows the secret & nullifier for the commitment which is in a leaf in the merkletree
    • the transition from RootOld (the current one in the Smart Contract) to RootNew has been done following the rules (only one leaf addition, no leaf deletion, correct leaf format, etc)
  • user sends ETH to the smart contract deposit call, together with the zkProof data
  • smart contract verifies the zkProof of the deposit, and if everything is ok stores the commitment & the new root

Deposit circuit can be found here.

Withdraw

All computation & constructions are done offchain and then proved inside a zkSNARK to the Smart Contract

  • user gets all the commitments from the SmartContract
  • build the MerkleTree with the getted commitments
  • generate the siblings (merkle proof) for the commitment of which the user knows the secret & nullifier
  • generate zkSNARK proof, where is proving: - user knows a secret for a public nullifier - which commitment is in the MerkleTree - which MerkleTree root is the one that knows the SmartContract
  • if the zkProof verification passes, and the nullifier was not already used, the Smart Contract sends the ETH to the specified address

Withdraw circuit can be found here.

Thanks

Miksi is possible thanks to circom, circomlib, wasmsnark, and thanks to the ideas about offchain computation validated with a zkSNARK in the Zexe paper.