* feat: zk nova layer * chore: clippy + trigger CI * chore: add comment for `new` (generating a zk nova ivc proof) * chore: adding text reference to `sample` * chore: use `debug_assert` instead of `cfg(test)` * improve: pass `poseidon_config` by ref Co-authored-by: Carlos Pérez <37264926+CPerezz@users.noreply.github.com> * improve: pass `z_0` by ref Co-authored-by: Carlos Pérez <37264926+CPerezz@users.noreply.github.com> * improve: pass `r1cs` and `cf_r1cs` by ref Co-authored-by: Carlos Pérez <37264926+CPerezz@users.noreply.github.com> * chore: appropriate docs (2) * chore: pass by ref modifications * improve: use single sponge * fix: remove blinding the cyclefold instance, add verifier checks on the prover provided cyclefold intance * fix: assert that the sampled relaxed r1cs is correct * fix: check length of `u_i.x` --------- Co-authored-by: Carlos Pérez <37264926+CPerezz@users.noreply.github.com>update-nifs-interface
@ -0,0 +1,419 @@ |
|||||
|
// Implements nova's zero-knowledge layer, as described in https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/573.pdf
|
||||
|
use crate::folding::nova::traits::NovaR1CS;
|
||||
|
use ark_crypto_primitives::sponge::CryptographicSponge;
|
||||
|
use ark_ff::{BigInteger, PrimeField};
|
||||
|
use ark_std::{One, Zero};
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
use crate::{
|
||||
|
arith::r1cs::{RelaxedR1CS, R1CS},
|
||||
|
RngCore,
|
||||
|
};
|
||||
|
use ark_crypto_primitives::sponge::{
|
||||
|
poseidon::{PoseidonConfig, PoseidonSponge},
|
||||
|
Absorb,
|
||||
|
};
|
||||
|
use ark_ec::{CurveGroup, Group};
|
||||
|
use ark_r1cs_std::{
|
||||
|
groups::{CurveVar, GroupOpsBounds},
|
||||
|
ToConstraintFieldGadget,
|
||||
|
};
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
use crate::{commitment::CommitmentScheme, folding::circuits::CF2, frontend::FCircuit, Error};
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
use super::{circuits::ChallengeGadget, nifs::NIFS, CommittedInstance, Nova, Witness};
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// We use the same definition of a folding proof as in https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/969.pdf
|
||||
|
// It consists in the commitment to the T term
|
||||
|
pub struct FoldingProof<C: CurveGroup> {
|
||||
|
cmT: C,
|
||||
|
}
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
pub struct RandomizedIVCProof<C1: CurveGroup, C2: CurveGroup> {
|
||||
|
pub U_i: CommittedInstance<C1>,
|
||||
|
pub u_i: CommittedInstance<C1>,
|
||||
|
pub U_r: CommittedInstance<C1>,
|
||||
|
pub pi: FoldingProof<C1>,
|
||||
|
pub pi_prime: FoldingProof<C1>,
|
||||
|
pub W_i_prime: Witness<C1>,
|
||||
|
pub cf_U_i: CommittedInstance<C2>,
|
||||
|
pub cf_W_i: Witness<C2>,
|
||||
|
}
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
impl<C1: CurveGroup, C2: CurveGroup> RandomizedIVCProof<C1, C2>
|
||||
|
where
|
||||
|
<C1 as Group>::ScalarField: Absorb,
|
||||
|
<C1 as CurveGroup>::BaseField: PrimeField,
|
||||
|
{
|
||||
|
/// Computes challenge required before folding instances
|
||||
|
fn get_folding_challenge(
|
||||
|
sponge: &mut PoseidonSponge<C1::ScalarField>,
|
||||
|
pp_hash: C1::ScalarField,
|
||||
|
U_i: CommittedInstance<C1>,
|
||||
|
u_i: CommittedInstance<C1>,
|
||||
|
cmT: C1,
|
||||
|
) -> Result<C1::ScalarField, Error> {
|
||||
|
let r_bits = ChallengeGadget::<C1>::get_challenge_native(sponge, pp_hash, U_i, u_i, cmT);
|
||||
|
C1::ScalarField::from_bigint(BigInteger::from_bits_le(&r_bits)).ok_or(Error::OutOfBounds)
|
||||
|
}
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
/// Compute a zero-knowledge proof of a Nova IVC proof
|
||||
|
/// It implements the prover of appendix D.4.in https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/573.pdf
|
||||
|
/// For further details on why folding is hiding, see lemma 9
|
||||
|
pub fn new<
|
||||
|
GC1: CurveVar<C1, CF2<C1>> + ToConstraintFieldGadget<CF2<C1>>,
|
||||
|
GC2: CurveVar<C2, CF2<C2>>,
|
||||
|
FC: FCircuit<C1::ScalarField>,
|
||||
|
CS1: CommitmentScheme<C1, true>,
|
||||
|
CS2: CommitmentScheme<C2, true>,
|
||||
|
>(
|
||||
|
nova: &Nova<C1, GC1, C2, GC2, FC, CS1, CS2, true>,
|
||||
|
mut rng: impl RngCore,
|
||||
|
) -> Result<RandomizedIVCProof<C1, C2>, Error>
|
||||
|
where
|
||||
|
<C1 as Group>::ScalarField: Absorb,
|
||||
|
<C2 as Group>::ScalarField: Absorb,
|
||||
|
<C2 as Group>::ScalarField: PrimeField,
|
||||
|
<C2 as CurveGroup>::BaseField: PrimeField,
|
||||
|
<C2 as CurveGroup>::BaseField: Absorb,
|
||||
|
for<'a> &'a GC2: GroupOpsBounds<'a, C2, GC2>,
|
||||
|
GC2: ToConstraintFieldGadget<<C2 as CurveGroup>::BaseField>,
|
||||
|
C1: CurveGroup<BaseField = C2::ScalarField, ScalarField = C2::BaseField>,
|
||||
|
{
|
||||
|
let mut challenges_sponge = PoseidonSponge::<C1::ScalarField>::new(&nova.poseidon_config);
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// I. Compute proof for 'regular' instances
|
||||
|
// 1. Fold the instance-witness pairs (U_i, W_i) with (u_i, w_i)
|
||||
|
// a. Compute T
|
||||
|
let (T, cmT) = NIFS::<C1, CS1, true>::compute_cmT(
|
||||
|
&nova.cs_pp,
|
||||
|
&nova.r1cs,
|
||||
|
&nova.w_i,
|
||||
|
&nova.u_i,
|
||||
|
&nova.W_i,
|
||||
|
&nova.U_i,
|
||||
|
)?;
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// b. Compute folding challenge
|
||||
|
let r = RandomizedIVCProof::<C1, C2>::get_folding_challenge(
|
||||
|
&mut challenges_sponge,
|
||||
|
nova.pp_hash,
|
||||
|
nova.U_i.clone(),
|
||||
|
nova.u_i.clone(),
|
||||
|
cmT,
|
||||
|
)?;
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// c. Compute fold
|
||||
|
let (W_f, U_f) = NIFS::<C1, CS1, true>::fold_instances(
|
||||
|
r, &nova.w_i, &nova.u_i, &nova.W_i, &nova.U_i, &T, cmT,
|
||||
|
)?;
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// d. Store folding proof
|
||||
|
let pi = FoldingProof { cmT };
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// 2. Sample a satisfying relaxed R1CS instance-witness pair (U_r, W_r)
|
||||
|
let relaxed_instance = nova.r1cs.clone().relax();
|
||||
|
let (U_r, W_r) = relaxed_instance.sample::<C1, CS1>(&nova.cs_pp, &mut rng)?;
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// 3. Fold the instance-witness pair (U_f, W_f) with (U_r, W_r)
|
||||
|
// a. Compute T
|
||||
|
let (T_i_prime, cmT_i_prime) =
|
||||
|
NIFS::<C1, CS1, true>::compute_cmT(&nova.cs_pp, &nova.r1cs, &W_f, &U_f, &W_r, &U_r)?;
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// b. Compute folding challenge
|
||||
|
let r_2 = RandomizedIVCProof::<C1, C2>::get_folding_challenge(
|
||||
|
&mut challenges_sponge,
|
||||
|
nova.pp_hash,
|
||||
|
U_f.clone(),
|
||||
|
U_r.clone(),
|
||||
|
cmT_i_prime,
|
||||
|
)?;
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// c. Compute fold
|
||||
|
let (W_i_prime, _) = NIFS::<C1, CS1, true>::fold_instances(
|
||||
|
r_2,
|
||||
|
&W_f,
|
||||
|
&U_f,
|
||||
|
&W_r,
|
||||
|
&U_r,
|
||||
|
&T_i_prime,
|
||||
|
cmT_i_prime,
|
||||
|
)?;
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// d. Store folding proof
|
||||
|
let pi_prime = FoldingProof { cmT: cmT_i_prime };
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Ok(RandomizedIVCProof {
|
||||
|
U_i: nova.U_i.clone(),
|
||||
|
u_i: nova.u_i.clone(),
|
||||
|
U_r,
|
||||
|
pi,
|
||||
|
pi_prime,
|
||||
|
W_i_prime,
|
||||
|
cf_U_i: nova.cf_U_i.clone(),
|
||||
|
cf_W_i: nova.cf_W_i.clone(),
|
||||
|
})
|
||||
|
}
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
/// Verify a zero-knowledge proof of a Nova IVC proof
|
||||
|
/// It implements the verifier of appendix D.4. in https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/573.pdf
|
||||
|
#[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
|
||||
|
pub fn verify<
|
||||
|
CS1: CommitmentScheme<C1, true>,
|
||||
|
GC2: CurveVar<C2, CF2<C2>>,
|
||||
|
CS2: CommitmentScheme<C2, true>,
|
||||
|
>(
|
||||
|
r1cs: &R1CS<C1::ScalarField>,
|
||||
|
cf_r1cs: &R1CS<C2::ScalarField>,
|
||||
|
pp_hash: C1::ScalarField,
|
||||
|
poseidon_config: &PoseidonConfig<C1::ScalarField>,
|
||||
|
i: C1::ScalarField,
|
||||
|
z_0: Vec<C1::ScalarField>,
|
||||
|
z_i: Vec<C1::ScalarField>,
|
||||
|
proof: &RandomizedIVCProof<C1, C2>,
|
||||
|
) -> Result<(), Error>
|
||||
|
where
|
||||
|
<C1 as Group>::ScalarField: Absorb,
|
||||
|
<C2 as Group>::ScalarField: Absorb,
|
||||
|
<C2 as CurveGroup>::BaseField: PrimeField,
|
||||
|
<C2 as CurveGroup>::BaseField: Absorb,
|
||||
|
for<'a> &'a GC2: GroupOpsBounds<'a, C2, GC2>,
|
||||
|
GC2: ToConstraintFieldGadget<<C2 as CurveGroup>::BaseField>,
|
||||
|
C1: CurveGroup<BaseField = C2::ScalarField, ScalarField = C2::BaseField>,
|
||||
|
{
|
||||
|
// Handles case where i=0
|
||||
|
if i == C1::ScalarField::zero() {
|
||||
|
if z_0 == z_i {
|
||||
|
return Ok(());
|
||||
|
} else {
|
||||
|
return Err(Error::zkIVCVerificationFail);
|
||||
|
}
|
||||
|
}
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// 1. Check that u_i.x is correct - including the cyclefold running instance
|
||||
|
// a. Check length
|
||||
|
if proof.u_i.x.len() != 2 {
|
||||
|
return Err(Error::IVCVerificationFail);
|
||||
|
}
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// b. Check computed hashes are correct
|
||||
|
let mut sponge = PoseidonSponge::<C1::ScalarField>::new(poseidon_config);
|
||||
|
let expected_u_i_x = proof.U_i.hash(&sponge, pp_hash, i, z_0, z_i);
|
||||
|
if expected_u_i_x != proof.u_i.x[0] {
|
||||
|
return Err(Error::zkIVCVerificationFail);
|
||||
|
}
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
let expected_cf_u_i_x = proof.cf_U_i.hash_cyclefold(&sponge, pp_hash);
|
||||
|
if expected_cf_u_i_x != proof.u_i.x[1] {
|
||||
|
return Err(Error::IVCVerificationFail);
|
||||
|
}
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// 2. Check that u_i values are correct
|
||||
|
if !proof.u_i.cmE.is_zero() || proof.u_i.u != C1::ScalarField::one() {
|
||||
|
return Err(Error::zkIVCVerificationFail);
|
||||
|
}
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// 3. Obtain the U_f folded instance
|
||||
|
// a. Compute folding challenge
|
||||
|
let r = RandomizedIVCProof::<C1, C2>::get_folding_challenge(
|
||||
|
&mut sponge,
|
||||
|
pp_hash,
|
||||
|
proof.U_i.clone(),
|
||||
|
proof.u_i.clone(),
|
||||
|
proof.pi.cmT,
|
||||
|
)?;
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// b. Get the U_f instance
|
||||
|
let U_f = NIFS::<C1, CS1, true>::fold_committed_instance(
|
||||
|
r,
|
||||
|
&proof.u_i,
|
||||
|
&proof.U_i,
|
||||
|
&proof.pi.cmT,
|
||||
|
);
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// 4. Obtain the U^{\prime}_i folded instance
|
||||
|
// a. Compute folding challenge
|
||||
|
let r_2 = RandomizedIVCProof::<C1, C2>::get_folding_challenge(
|
||||
|
&mut sponge,
|
||||
|
pp_hash,
|
||||
|
U_f.clone(),
|
||||
|
proof.U_r.clone(),
|
||||
|
proof.pi_prime.cmT,
|
||||
|
)?;
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// b. Compute fold
|
||||
|
let U_i_prime = NIFS::<C1, CS1, true>::fold_committed_instance(
|
||||
|
r_2,
|
||||
|
&U_f,
|
||||
|
&proof.U_r,
|
||||
|
&proof.pi_prime.cmT,
|
||||
|
);
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// 5. Check that W^{\prime}_i is a satisfying witness
|
||||
|
let mut z = vec![U_i_prime.u];
|
||||
|
z.extend(&U_i_prime.x);
|
||||
|
z.extend(&proof.W_i_prime.W);
|
||||
|
let relaxed_r1cs = RelaxedR1CS {
|
||||
|
l: r1cs.l,
|
||||
|
A: r1cs.A.clone(),
|
||||
|
B: r1cs.B.clone(),
|
||||
|
C: r1cs.C.clone(),
|
||||
|
u: U_i_prime.u,
|
||||
|
E: proof.W_i_prime.E.clone(),
|
||||
|
};
|
||||
|
relaxed_r1cs.check_relation(&z)?;
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// 6. Check that the cyclefold instance-witness pair satisfies the cyclefold relaxed r1cs
|
||||
|
cf_r1cs.check_relaxed_instance_relation(&proof.cf_W_i, &proof.cf_U_i)?;
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Ok(())
|
||||
|
}
|
||||
|
}
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
|
pub mod tests {
|
||||
|
use super::*;
|
||||
|
use crate::commitment::pedersen::Pedersen;
|
||||
|
use crate::folding::nova::tests::test_ivc_opt;
|
||||
|
use crate::frontend::tests::CubicFCircuit;
|
||||
|
use crate::transcript::poseidon::poseidon_canonical_config;
|
||||
|
use ark_bn254::{Fr, G1Projective as Projective};
|
||||
|
use ark_grumpkin::{constraints::GVar as GVar2, Projective as Projective2};
|
||||
|
use rand::rngs::OsRng;
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// Tests zk proof generation and verification for a valid nova IVC proof
|
||||
|
#[test]
|
||||
|
fn test_zk_nova_ivc() {
|
||||
|
let mut rng = OsRng;
|
||||
|
let poseidon_config = poseidon_canonical_config::<Fr>();
|
||||
|
let F_circuit = CubicFCircuit::<Fr>::new(()).unwrap();
|
||||
|
let (_, nova) = test_ivc_opt::<Pedersen<Projective, true>, Pedersen<Projective2, true>, true>(
|
||||
|
poseidon_config.clone(),
|
||||
|
F_circuit,
|
||||
|
3,
|
||||
|
);
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
let proof = RandomizedIVCProof::new(&nova, &mut rng).unwrap();
|
||||
|
let verify = RandomizedIVCProof::verify::<
|
||||
|
Pedersen<Projective, true>,
|
||||
|
GVar2,
|
||||
|
Pedersen<Projective2, true>,
|
||||
|
>(
|
||||
|
&nova.r1cs,
|
||||
|
&nova.cf_r1cs,
|
||||
|
nova.pp_hash,
|
||||
|
&nova.poseidon_config,
|
||||
|
nova.i,
|
||||
|
nova.z_0,
|
||||
|
nova.z_i,
|
||||
|
&proof,
|
||||
|
);
|
||||
|
assert!(verify.is_ok());
|
||||
|
}
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
#[test]
|
||||
|
fn test_zk_nova_when_i_is_zero() {
|
||||
|
let mut rng = OsRng;
|
||||
|
let poseidon_config = poseidon_canonical_config::<Fr>();
|
||||
|
let F_circuit = CubicFCircuit::<Fr>::new(()).unwrap();
|
||||
|
let (_, nova) = test_ivc_opt::<Pedersen<Projective, true>, Pedersen<Projective2, true>, true>(
|
||||
|
poseidon_config.clone(),
|
||||
|
F_circuit,
|
||||
|
0,
|
||||
|
);
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
let proof = RandomizedIVCProof::new(&nova, &mut rng).unwrap();
|
||||
|
let verify = RandomizedIVCProof::verify::<
|
||||
|
Pedersen<Projective, true>,
|
||||
|
GVar2,
|
||||
|
Pedersen<Projective2, true>,
|
||||
|
>(
|
||||
|
&nova.r1cs,
|
||||
|
&nova.cf_r1cs,
|
||||
|
nova.pp_hash,
|
||||
|
&nova.poseidon_config,
|
||||
|
nova.i,
|
||||
|
nova.z_0,
|
||||
|
nova.z_i,
|
||||
|
&proof,
|
||||
|
);
|
||||
|
assert!(verify.is_ok());
|
||||
|
}
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
#[test]
|
||||
|
fn test_zk_nova_verification_fails_with_wrong_running_instance() {
|
||||
|
let mut rng = OsRng;
|
||||
|
let poseidon_config = poseidon_canonical_config::<Fr>();
|
||||
|
let F_circuit = CubicFCircuit::<Fr>::new(()).unwrap();
|
||||
|
let (_, nova) = test_ivc_opt::<Pedersen<Projective, true>, Pedersen<Projective2, true>, true>(
|
||||
|
poseidon_config.clone(),
|
||||
|
F_circuit,
|
||||
|
3,
|
||||
|
);
|
||||
|
let (sampled_committed_instance, _) = nova
|
||||
|
.r1cs
|
||||
|
.clone()
|
||||
|
.relax()
|
||||
|
.sample::<Projective, Pedersen<Projective, true>>(&nova.cs_pp, rng)
|
||||
|
.unwrap();
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// proof verification fails with incorrect running instance
|
||||
|
let mut nova_with_incorrect_running_instance = nova.clone();
|
||||
|
nova_with_incorrect_running_instance.U_i = sampled_committed_instance;
|
||||
|
let incorrect_proof =
|
||||
|
RandomizedIVCProof::new(&nova_with_incorrect_running_instance, &mut rng).unwrap();
|
||||
|
let verify = RandomizedIVCProof::verify::<
|
||||
|
Pedersen<Projective, true>,
|
||||
|
GVar2,
|
||||
|
Pedersen<Projective2, true>,
|
||||
|
>(
|
||||
|
&nova_with_incorrect_running_instance.r1cs,
|
||||
|
&nova_with_incorrect_running_instance.cf_r1cs,
|
||||
|
nova_with_incorrect_running_instance.pp_hash,
|
||||
|
&nova_with_incorrect_running_instance.poseidon_config,
|
||||
|
nova_with_incorrect_running_instance.i,
|
||||
|
nova_with_incorrect_running_instance.z_0,
|
||||
|
nova_with_incorrect_running_instance.z_i,
|
||||
|
&incorrect_proof,
|
||||
|
);
|
||||
|
assert!(verify.is_err());
|
||||
|
}
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
#[test]
|
||||
|
fn test_zk_nova_verification_fails_with_wrong_running_witness() {
|
||||
|
let mut rng = OsRng;
|
||||
|
let poseidon_config = poseidon_canonical_config::<Fr>();
|
||||
|
let F_circuit = CubicFCircuit::<Fr>::new(()).unwrap();
|
||||
|
let (_, nova) = test_ivc_opt::<Pedersen<Projective, true>, Pedersen<Projective2, true>, true>(
|
||||
|
poseidon_config.clone(),
|
||||
|
F_circuit,
|
||||
|
3,
|
||||
|
);
|
||||
|
let (_, sampled_committed_witness) = nova
|
||||
|
.r1cs
|
||||
|
.clone()
|
||||
|
.relax()
|
||||
|
.sample::<Projective, Pedersen<Projective, true>>(&nova.cs_pp, rng)
|
||||
|
.unwrap();
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// proof generation fails with incorrect running witness
|
||||
|
let mut nova_with_incorrect_running_witness = nova.clone();
|
||||
|
nova_with_incorrect_running_witness.W_i = sampled_committed_witness;
|
||||
|
let incorrect_proof =
|
||||
|
RandomizedIVCProof::new(&nova_with_incorrect_running_witness, &mut rng).unwrap();
|
||||
|
let verify = RandomizedIVCProof::verify::<
|
||||
|
Pedersen<Projective, true>,
|
||||
|
GVar2,
|
||||
|
Pedersen<Projective2, true>,
|
||||
|
>(
|
||||
|
&nova_with_incorrect_running_witness.r1cs,
|
||||
|
&nova_with_incorrect_running_witness.cf_r1cs,
|
||||
|
nova_with_incorrect_running_witness.pp_hash,
|
||||
|
&nova_with_incorrect_running_witness.poseidon_config,
|
||||
|
nova_with_incorrect_running_witness.i,
|
||||
|
nova_with_incorrect_running_witness.z_0,
|
||||
|
nova_with_incorrect_running_witness.z_i,
|
||||
|
&incorrect_proof,
|
||||
|
);
|
||||
|
assert!(verify.is_err());
|
||||
|
}
|
||||
|
}
|