arnaucube
arnaucube/mathPublic Self-hosted repository
math/galois-theory-notes.tex
galois-theory-notes.texRaw
  1\documentclass{article}
  2\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
  3\usepackage{amsfonts}
  4\usepackage{amsthm}
  5\usepackage{amsmath}
  6\usepackage{enumerate}
  7\usepackage{hyperref}
  8\usepackage{amssymb}
  9\usepackage{tikz} % diagram
 10
 11\begin{filecontents}[overwrite]{galois-theory-notes.bib}
 12@misc{ianstewart,
 13  author = {Ian Stewart},
 14  title = {{Galois Theory, Third Edition}},
 15  year = {2004}
 16}
 17
 18@misc{milneFT,
 19  author={Milne, James S.},
 20  title={Fields and Galois Theory (v5.10)},
 21  year={2022},
 22  note={Available at \url{https://jmilne.org/math/} },
 23  pages={144}
 24}
 25
 26@misc{berlekamp,
 27  author={Elmyn Berlekamp},
 28  title={Algebraic Coding Theory},
 29  year={1984},
 30  note={Revised Edition from 1984}
 31}
 32
 33@misc{dihedral,
 34  author = {Gaurab Bardhan and Palash Nath and Himangshu Chakraborty},
 35  title = {Subgroups and normal subgroups of dihedral group up to isomorphism},
 36  year = {2010},
 37  note = {\url{https://scipp.ucsc.edu/~haber/ph251/Dn_subgroups.pdf}},
 38  url = {https://scipp.ucsc.edu/~haber/ph251/Dn_subgroups.pdf}
 39}
 40\end{filecontents}
 41\nocite{*}
 42
 43
 44\theoremstyle{definition}
 45
 46\newtheorem{innerdefn}{Definition}
 47\newenvironment{defn}[1]
 48{\renewcommand\theinnerdefn{#1}\innerdefn}
 49{\endinnerdefn}
 50
 51\newtheorem{innerthm}{Theorem}
 52\newenvironment{thm}[1]
 53{\renewcommand\theinnerthm{#1}\innerthm}
 54{\endinnerthm}
 55
 56\newtheorem{innerlemma}{Lemma}
 57\newenvironment{lemma}[1]
 58{\renewcommand\theinnerlemma{#1}\innerlemma}
 59{\endinnerlemma}
 60
 61\newtheorem{innercor}{Lemma}
 62\newenvironment{cor}[1]
 63{\renewcommand\theinnercor{#1}\innercor}
 64{\endinnercor}
 65
 66\newtheorem{innereg}{Example}
 67\newenvironment{eg}[1]
 68{\renewcommand\theinnereg{#1}\innereg}
 69{\endinnereg}
 70
 71
 72\title{Galois Theory notes}
 73\author{arnaucube}
 74\date{2025}
 75
 76\begin{document}
 77
 78\maketitle
 79
 80\begin{abstract}
 81	Notes taken while studying Galois Theory, mostly from Ian Stewart's book "Galois Theory" \cite{ianstewart}.
 82
 83	Usually while reading books and papers I take handwritten notes in a notebook, this document contains some of them re-written to $LaTeX$.
 84
 85	The notes are not complete, don't include all the steps neither all the proofs.
 86\end{abstract}
 87
 88\tableofcontents
 89
 90\section{Recap on the degree of field extensions}
 91(Definitions, theorems, lemmas, corollaries and examples enumeration follows from Ian Stewart's book \cite{ianstewart}).
 92
 93\begin{defn}{4.10}
 94  A \emph{simple extension} is $L:K$ such that $L=K(\alpha)$ for some $\alpha \in L$.
 95\end{defn}
 96\begin{eg}{4.11}
 97  Beware, $L=\mathbb{Q}(i, -i, \sqrt{5}, -\sqrt{5}) = \mathbb{Q}(i, \sqrt{5}) = \mathbb{Q}(i+\sqrt{5})$.
 98\end{eg}
 99
100\begin{defn}{5.5}
101  Let $L:K$, suppose $\alpha \in L$ is algebraic over $K$. Then, the \emph{minimal polynomial} of $\alpha$ over $K$ is the unique monic polynomial $m$ over $K$, $m(t) \in K[t]$, of smallest degree such that $m(\alpha)=0$.
102  \\
103  eg.: $i \in \mathbb{C}$ is algebraic over $\mathbb{R}$. The minimal polynomial of $i$ over $\mathbb{R}$ is $m(t)=t^2 +1$, so that $m(i)=0$.
104\end{defn}
105
106\begin{lemma}{5.9}
107  Every polynomial $a \in K[t]$ is congruent modulo $m$ to a unique polynomial of degree $< \delta m$.
108\end{lemma}
109\begin{proof}
110  Divide $a / m$ with remainder, $a= qm +r$, with $q,r \in K[t]$ and $\delta r < \delta m$.
111  Then, $a-r=qm$, so $a \equiv r \pmod{m}$.
112
113  It remains to prove uniqueness.
114
115  Suppose $\exists~ r \equiv s \pmod{m}$, with $\delta r, \delta s < \delta m$.
116  Then, $r-s$ is divisible by $m$, but has smaller degree than $m$.
117
118  Therefore, $r-s=0$, so $r=s$, proving uniqueness.
119\end{proof}
120
121\begin{lemma}{5.14}
122  Let $K(\alpha):K$ be a simple algebraic extension, let $m$ be the minimal polynomial of $\alpha$ over $K$, let $\delta m =n$.
123
124  Then $\{1, \alpha, \alpha^2, \ldots, \alpha^{n-1}\}$ is a basis for $K(\alpha)$ over $K$.
125  In particular, $[K(\alpha):K]=n$.
126\end{lemma}
127
128\begin{defn}{6.2}
129  The degree $[L:K]$ of a field extension $L:K$ is the dimension of L considered as a vector space over $K$.
130
131  Equivalently, the dimension of $L$ as a vector space over $K$ is the number of terms in the expression for a general element of $L$ using coefficients from $K$.
132\end{defn}
133
134\begin{eg}{6.3}
135  \begin{enumerate}
136    \item $\mathbb{C}$ elements are 2-dimensional over $\mathbb{R}$ ($p+qi \in \mathbb{C}$, with $p,q \in \mathbb{R}$), because a basis is $\{1, i\}$, hence $[\mathbb{C}:\mathbb{R}]=2$.
137    \item $[ \mathbb{Q}(i, \sqrt{5}) : \mathbb{Q}]=4$, since the elements $\{1, \sqrt{5}, i, i\sqrt{5}\}$ form a basis for $\mathbb{Q}(i, \sqrt{5})$ over $\mathbb{Q}$.
138  \end{enumerate}
139\end{eg}
140
141\begin{thm}{6.4}\emph{(Short Tower Law)} \label{shorttowerlaw}
142  If $K, L, M \subseteq \mathbb{C}$, and $K \subseteq L \subseteq M$, then $[M:K]=[M:L]\cdot [L:K]$.
143\end{thm}
144\begin{proof}
145  Let $(x_i)_{i \in I}$ be a basis for $L$ over $K$,
146  let $(y_j)_{j \in J}$ be a basis for $M$ over $L$.\\
147  $\forall i \in I, j \in J$, we have $x_i \in L, u_j \in M$.
148  \\
149  Want to show that $(x_i y_j)_{i\in I, j\in J}$ is a basis for $M$ over $K$.
150  \begin{enumerate}[i.]
151    \item prove linear independence:\\
152      Suppose that
153      $$\sum_{ij} k_{ij} x_i y_j = 0 ~(k_{ij} \in K)$$
154      rearrange
155      $$\sum_j (\underbrace{\sum_i k_{ij} x_i}_{\in L}) y_j = 0 ~(k_{ij} \in K)$$
156      Since $\sum_i k_{ij} x_i \in L$, and the $y_j \in M$ are linearly independent over $L$, then $\sum_i k_{ij} x_i = 0$.
157      \\
158      Repeating the argument inside $L$ $\longrightarrow$ $k_{ij}=0 ~~\forall i\in I, j\in J$.
159      \\
160      So the elements $x_i y_j$ are linearly independent over $K$.
161
162    \item prove that $x_i y_j$ span $M$ over $K$:\\
163      Any $x \in M$ can be written $x=\sum_j \lambda_j y_j$ for $\lambda_j \in L$, because $y_j$ spans $M$ over $L$.
164      Similarly, $\forall j\in J,~ \lambda_j = \sum_i \lambda_{ij} x_i y_j$ for  $\lambda_{ij} \in K$.\\
165      Putting the pieces together, $x=\sum_{ij} \lambda_{ij} x_i y_j$ as required.
166  \end{enumerate}
167\end{proof}
168
169\begin{cor}{6.6}\emph{(Tower Law)}\\ \label{towerlaw}
170  If $K_0 \subseteq K_1 \subseteq \ldots \subseteq K_n$ are subfields of $\mathbb{C}$, then
171  $$[K_n:K_0] = [K_n:K_{n-1}] \cdot [K_{n-1}:K_{n-2}] \cdot \ldots \cdot [K_1: K_0]$$
172\end{cor}
173\begin{proof}
174  From \ref{shorttowerlaw}.
175\end{proof}
176
177[...] TODO: pending to add key parts up to Chapter 15.
178
179
180\newpage
181
182\section{Tools}
183This section contains tools that I found useful to solve Galois Theory related problems, and that don't appear in Stewart's book.
184
185\subsection{De Moivre's Theorem and Euler's formula}\label{demoivre}
186Useful for finding all the roots of a polynomial.
187
188Euler's formula:
189$$e^{i \psi} = cos \psi + i \cdot sin \psi$$
190
191The n-th roots of a complex number $z=x + i y = r (cos \theta + i \cdot sin \theta)$ are given by
192
193$$z_k = \sqrt[n]{r} \cdot \left(cos(\frac{\theta + 2k \pi}{n}) + i \cdot sin(\frac{\theta + 2k \pi}{n}) \right)$$
194for $k=0, \ldots, n-1$.
195
196So, by Euler's formula:
197$$z_k = \sqrt[n]{r} \cdot e^{i (\frac{\theta + 2 k \pi}{n})}$$
198
199Usually we will set $\alpha=\sqrt[n]{r}$ and $\zeta = e^{\frac{2 \pi i}{n}}$,
200and find the $\mathbb{Q}$-automorphisms from there (see \ref{ex:galoisgroups} for examples).
201
202\subsection{Einsenstein's Criterion} \label{einsenstein}
203\emph{reference: Stewart's book}
204
205Let $f(t) = a_0 + a_1 t + \ldots + a_n t^n$, suppose there is a prime $q$ such that
206\begin{enumerate}
207  \item $q \nmid a_n$
208  \item $q | a_i$ for $i=0, \ldots, n-1$
209  \item $q^2 \nmid a_0$
210\end{enumerate}
211Then, $f$ is irreducible over $\mathbb{Q}$.
212
213\emph{TODO proof \& Gauss lemma.}
214
215
216\subsection{Elementary symmetric polynomials}
217\emph{TODO from orange notebook, page 36}
218
219\subsection{Cyclotomic polynomials} \label{cyclotomicpoly}
220\subsubsection{From Elmyn Berlekamp's "Algebraic Coding Theory" book}
221The notes in this section are from the book "Algebraic Coding Theory" by Elmyn
222Berlekamp \cite{berlekamp}.
223
224\vspace{0.3cm}
225
226Some times we might find polynomials that have the shape of $t^n - 1$, those are \emph{cyclotomic polynomials}, and have some properties that might be useful.
227
228Observe that in a finite field of order $q$, factoring $x^q - x$ gives
229$$x^q-x = x(x^{q-1} -1)$$
230
231The factor $x^{q-1} -1$ is a special case of $x^n -1$: if we assume that the
232field contains an element $\alpha$ of order $n$, then the roots of $x^n-1=0$ are
233$$1, \alpha, \alpha^2, \alpha^3, \ldots, \alpha^{n-1}$$
234and $\deg(x^n-1)=n$, thus $x^n-1$ has at most $n$ roots in any field, henceforth
235the powers of $\alpha$ must include all the $n$-th roots of unity.
236
237There fore, in any field which contains a primitive $n$-th root of unity we have:
238
239\begin{thm}{4.31}
240  $$x^n -1 = \prod_{i=0}^{n-1} (x - \alpha^i) = \prod_{i=1}^n (x-\alpha^i)$$
241\end{thm}
242
243If $n=k \cdot d$, then $\alpha^k, \alpha^{2k}, \alpha^{3k}, \ldots, \alpha^{dk}$ are all roots of $x^d -1 =0$
244
245Every element with order dividing $n$, must be a power of $\alpha$, since an
246element of order $d$ is a $d$-th root of unity.
247
248Every power of $\alpha$ has order which divides $n$, and every field element
249whose order divides $n$ is a power of $\alpha$. This suggests that we partition
250the powers of $\alpha$ according to their orders:
251$$x^n -1 = \prod_{\stackrel{d,}{d|n}} \prod_{\beta} (x- \beta)$$
252where at each iteration, $\beta$ is a field element of order $d$ for each $d$.
253
254The polynomial whose roots are the field elements of order $d$ is called the
255\emph{cyclotomic polynomial}, denoted by $Q^{(d)}(x)$.
256
257\begin{thm}{4.32}
258  $$x^n -1 = \prod_{\stackrel{d,}{d|n}} Q^{(d)}(x)$$
259\end{thm}
260
261
262\subsubsection{From Ian Stewart's ``Galois Theory'' book}
263Notes from Ian Stewart's book \cite{ianstewart}.
264
265Consider the case $n=12$, let $\zeta=e^{\pi i /6}$ be a primitive $12$-th root of unity.
266Classify its powers ($\zeta^j$) according to their minimal power $d$ such that
267$(\zeta^j)^d = 1$ (ie. when they are primitive $d$-th roots of unity).
268
269\begin{enumerate}[]
270  \item $d=1,~~~ 1$
271  \item $d=2,~~~ \zeta^6$
272  \item $d=3,~~~ \zeta^4, \zeta^8$
273  \item $d=4,~~~ \zeta^3, \zeta^9$
274  \item $d=6,~~~ \zeta^2, \zeta^{10}$
275  \item $d=12,~~~ \zeta, \zeta^5, \zeta^7, \zeta^{11}$
276\end{enumerate}
277
278Observe that we can factorize $t^{12} -1$ by grouping the corresponding zeros:
279\begin{align*}
280  t^{12}-1 = &(t-1) \times\\
281	     &(t-\zeta^6) \times\\
282	     &(t-\zeta^4) (t-\zeta^8) \times\\
283	     &(t-\zeta^3) (t-\zeta^9) \times\\
284	     &(t-\zeta^2) (t-\zeta^{10}) \times\\
285	     &(t-\zeta) (t-\zeta^5)(t-\zeta^7) (t-\zeta^{11})
286\end{align*}
287which simplifies to
288$$t^{12}-1=(t-1)(t+1)(t^2+t+1)(t^2+1)(t^2-t+1)F(t)$$
289where $F(t) = (t-\zeta) (t-\zeta^5)(t-\zeta^7) (t-\zeta^{11}) = t^4 -t^2 + 1$ (this last step can be obtained either by multiplying $(t-\zeta)(t-\zeta^5)(t-\zeta^7) (t-\zeta^{11})$ together, or by dividing $t^{12}-1$ by all the other factors).
290
291
292Let $\Phi_d(t)$ be the factor corresponding to primitive $d$-th roots of unity, then we have proved that
293$$t^{12}-1 = \Phi_1 \Phi_2 \Phi_3 \Phi_4 \Phi_6 \Phi_{12}$$
294
295
296\begin{defn}{21.5}
297  The polynomial $\Phi_d(t)$ defined by
298  $$\Phi_n(t) = \prod_{a\in \mathbb{Z}_n,(a,n)=1} (t- \zeta^a)$$
299  is the $n$-th \emph{cyclotomic polynomial} over \mathbb{C}.
300\end{defn}
301
302\begin{cor}{21.6}
303  $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}$, the polynomial $\Phi_n(t)$ lies in $\mathbb{Z}[t]$ and is monic and irreducible.
304\end{cor}
305
306\begin{thm}{21.9}
307  \begin{enumerate}
308  \item The Galois group $\Gamma(\mathbb{Q}(\zeta):\mathbb{Q})$ consists of the
309  $\mathbb{Q}$-automorphisms $\psi_j$ defined by
310  $$\psi_j(\zeta)=\zeta^j$$
311  where $0 \leq j \leq n-1$ and $j$ is prime to $n$.
312
313  \item $\Gamma(\mathbb{Q}(\zeta):\mathbb{Q}) \stackrel{iso}{\cong} \mathbb{Z}_n^*$, and is an abelian group.
314  \item its order is $\phi(n)$
315  \item if $n$ is prime, $\mathbb{Z}_n^*$ is cyclic
316\end{thm}
317
318
319
320\vspace{1cm}
321
322\subsubsection{Examples}
323Examples of cyclotomic polynomials:
324
325\begin{align*}
326  \Phi_n(x) &= x^{n-1} + x^{n-2} + \ldots + x^2 + x + 1 = \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} x^i\\
327  \Phi_{2p}(x) &= x^{p-1} + \ldots + x^2 - x + 1 = \sum_{i=0}^{p-1} (-x)^i\\
328  \Phi_m(x) &= x^{m/2} + 1, ~~\text{when $m$ is a power of $2$}
329\end{align*}
330
331
332\subsection{Lemma 1.42 from J.S.Milne's book}
333Lemma from J.S.Milne's book \cite{milneFT}.
334
335Useful for when dealing with $x^p - 1$ with $p$ prime.
336
337Observe that
338
339$$x^p -1 = (x-1)(x^{p-1} + x^{p-2} + \ldots + 1)$$
340
341Notice that
342$$\Phi_p(x) = x^{p-1} + x^{p-2} + \ldots + 1$$
343is the $p$-th Cyclotomic polynomial.
344
345\begin{lemma}{1.42}
346  If $p$ prime, then $x^{p-1} + \ldots + 1$ is irreducible; hence $\mathbb{Q}[e^{2 \pi i /p}]$ has degree $p-1$ over $\mathbb{Q}$.
347\end{lemma}
348\begin{proof}
349  Let $f(x) = (x^p - 1)/(x-1) = x^{p-1} + \ldots + 1$
350  then
351  $$
352  f(x+1) = \frac{(x+1)^p -1}{x+1-1} = \frac{(x+1)^p -1}{x} = x^{p-1} + \ldots + a_i x^i + \ldots + p
353  $$
354
355  with $a_i = \left( \stackrel{p}{i+1} \right)$.
356
357  We know that $p | a_i$ for $i= 1, \ldots, p-2$, therefore $f(x+1)$ is irreducibe by Einsenstein's Criterion.
358
359  This implies that $f(x)$ is irreducible.
360\end{proof}
361
362
363\subsection{Dihedral groups - Groups of symmetries} \label{dihedral}
364Source: Wikipedia and \cite{dihedral}.
365
366Dihedral groups ($\mathbb{D}_n$) represent the symmetries of a regular $n$-gon.
367
368Properties:
369\begin{itemize}
370  \item are non-abelian (for $n>2$), ie. $rs \neq sr$
371  \item order $2n$
372  \item generated by a rotation $r$ and a reflection $s$
373  \item $r^n = s^2 = id,~~~(rs)^2=id$
374\end{itemize}
375Subgroups of $\mathbb{D}_n$:
376\begin{itemize}
377  \item rotation form a cyclic subgroup of order $n$, denoted as $<r>$
378  \item for each $d$ such that $d|n$, $\exists~ \mathbb{D}_d$ with order $2d$
379  \item normal subgroups
380    \begin{itemize}
381      \item for $n$ odd: $\mathbb{D}_n$ and $<r^d>$ for every $d|n$
382      \item for $n$ even: $2$ additional normal subgroups
383    \end{itemize}
384  \item Klein four-groups: $\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2$, of order 4
385\end{itemize}
386
387\vspace{0.3cm}
388Total number of subgroups in $\mathbb{D}_n$: $d(n) + s(n)$, where $d(n)$ is the number of positive disivors of $n$, and $s(n)$ is the sum of those divisors.
389
390\begin{eg}{}
391For $\mathbb{D}_6$, we have $\{1,2,3,6\} | 6$, so $d(n) = d(6) = 4$, and
392$s(6) = 1+2+3+6 = 12$; henceforth, the total amount of subgroups is $d(n)+s(n) = 4+12 = 16$.
393\end{eg}
394
395\vspace{0.3cm}
396For $n \geq 3, ~~\mathbb{D}_n \subseteq \mathbb{S}_n$ (subgroup of the Symmetry group).
397
398
399
400\newpage
401
402\section{Exercises}
403
404\subsection{Galois groups}\label{ex:galoisgroups}
405
406\subsubsection[t6-7]{$t^6-7 \in \mathbb{Q}$}
407
408This exercise comes from a combination of exercises 12.4 and 13.7 from \cite{ianstewart}.
409
410First let's find the roots. By De Moivre's Theorem (\ref{demoivre}), $t_k =
411\sqrt[6]{7} \cdot e^{i \frac{2 \pi k}{6}}$.
412
413From which we denote $\alpha = \sqrt[6]{7}$, and $\zeta = e^{\frac{2 \pi i}{6}}$, so that the
414roots of the polynomial are $\{ \alpha, \alpha \zeta, \alpha \zeta^2, \alpha \zeta^3, \alpha \zeta^4, \alpha \zeta^5\}$, ie. 
415$\{ \alpha \zeta^k \}_0^5$.
416
417Hence the \emph{splitting field} is $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha, \zeta)$.
418
419\emph{Degree of the extension}
420
421In order to find $[\mathbb{Q}(\alpha, \zeta) : \mathbb{Q}$, we're going to split it in tow
422parts. By the Tower Law (\ref{towerlaw}),
423
424$$[\mathbb{Q}(\alpha, \zeta) : \mathbb{Q}] = [\mathbb{Q}(\alpha, \zeta) : \mathbb{Q}(\alpha)] \cdot [\mathbb{Q}(\alpha) : \mathbb{Q}]$$
425
426To find each degree, we will find the minimal polynomial of the adjoined term over the base field of the extension:
427
428\begin{enumerate}[i.]
429  \item minimal polynomial of $\alpha$ over $\mathbb{Q}$\\
430    By Einsenstein's Criterion (\ref{einsenstein}), with $q=7$ we have that $q
431    \nmid 1$, $7 | {-7,0,0,\ldots}$, and $7^2 \nmid -7$, hence $f(t)$ is
432    irreducibe over $\mathbb{Q}$, thus is the minimal polynomial
433    $$m_i(t)= f(t) =t^6-7$$
434    which has roots $\{ \alpha \zeta^k \}_0^5$.
435  \item minimal polynomial of $\zeta$ over $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$\\
436    Since $\zeta$ is the primitive $6$th root of unity, we know that the minimal
437    polynomial will be the $6$th cyclotomic polynomial (\ref{cyclotomicpoly}):
438    $$m_{ii}(t) = \Phi_6(t) = t^2 - t + 1$$
439    which has roots $\zeta, -\zeta$.
440
441    Since $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha) \subseteq \mathbb{R}$, and the roots of
442    $\Phi_6(t)=t^2 - t +1$ are in $\mathbb{C}$, $\Phi_6(t)$ remains irreducible
443    over $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$.
444\end{enumerate}
445
446\vspace{0.5cm}
447Therefore, by the tower of law,
448$$[\mathbb{Q}(\alpha, \zeta) : \mathbb{Q}] = \deg{\Phi_6(t)} \cdot \deg{f(t)} = 2 \cdot 6 = 12$$
449and by the Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory, we know that
450$$|\Gamma( \mathbb{Q}(\alpha, \zeta) : \mathbb{Q} )| = [\mathbb{Q}(\alpha, \zeta) : \mathbb{Q}] = 12$$
451which tells us that there exist $12$ $\mathbb{Q}$-automorphisms of the Galois group.
452
453
454\vspace{0.5cm}
455Let's find the $12$ $\mathbb{Q}$-automorphisms. Start by defining $\sigma$ which
456fixes $\zeta$ and acts on $\alpha$, sending it to another of the roots of the
457minimal polynomial of $\alpha$ over $\mathbb{Q}$, $f(t)$, choose $\alpha \zeta$.
458
459Now define $\tau$ which fixes $\alpha$ and acts on $\zeta$, sending it into
460another root of the minimal polynomial of $\zeta$ over $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$,
461choose $-\zeta$.
462
463\vspace{0.3cm}
464\begin{tabular}{@{}l l@{}}
465    $\begin{aligned}
466      \sigma: \alpha &\mapsto \alpha \zeta \\
467      \zeta &\mapsto \zeta
468    \end{aligned}$
469  &
470    $\begin{aligned}
471      \tau: \alpha &\mapsto \alpha\\
472      \zeta &\mapsto -\zeta = \zeta^{-1}
473    \end{aligned}$
474\end{tabular}
475
476In other words, we have $12$ $\mathbb{Q}$-automorphisms, which are the
477combination of $\sigma$ and $\tau$:
478
479$$\begin{aligned}
480  \sigma^k \tau^j:~~&\alpha \mapsto \alpha \zeta^k\\
481		    &\zeta \mapsto \zeta^j
482\end{aligned}$$
483
484for $0 \leq k \leq 5$ and $j = \pm 1$.
485
486\vspace{0.5cm}
487
488NOTE: WIP diagram.
489\begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=2cm]
490  \def \radius{2}
491  \draw (0,0) circle (\radius);
492
493  \foreach \k in {0,...,5} {
494    % \node (a\k) at ({360/6 * \k}:\radius) {$\alpha \zeta^{\k}$};
495    \node (a\k) at ({360/6 * \k}:\radius+0.5) {$\alpha \zeta^{\k}$};
496    \fill ({360/6 * \k}:\radius) circle (2pt);
497  }
498  % real & im axis
499  \draw[->] (-2.5,0) -- (2.5,0) node[right] {};
500  \draw[->] (0,-2.5) -- (0,2.5) node[above] {};
501
502
503  % tau:
504  \draw[<->] (3,1) -- (3,-1) node[right] {$\tau$};
505  % sigma:
506  % \foreach \k [evaluate=\k as \next using int(mod(\k+1,6))] in {0,...,5} {
507  %   \coordinate (p\k) at ({360/6 * \k}:\radius);
508  %   \coordinate (p\next) at ({360/6 * \next}:\radius);
509  % 
510  %   \draw[->, bend left=30] (p\k.center) -- node[above] {$\sigma$} (p\next.center);
511  % }
512  \foreach \k in {0,...,5} {
513    \coordinate (p\k) at ({360/6 * \k}:\radius);
514  }
515  \foreach \k [evaluate=\k as \next using int(mod(\k+1,6))] in {0,...,5} {
516    \draw[->, bend left=30] (p\k) -- node[above] {$\sigma$} (p\next);
517  }
518\end{tikzpicture}
519
520\vspace{0.5cm}
521
522Observe, that $\Gamma$ is generated by the combination of $\sigma$ and $\tau$,
523and it is isomorphic to the group of symmetries of order 12, the dihedral
524group (\ref{dihedral}) of order 12, $\mathbb{D}_6$, ie. $\Gamma \cong \mathbb{D}_6$.
525
526\vspace{0.5cm}
527
528Let's find the subgroups of $\Gamma$, and the fixed fields of $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha, \zeta)$.
529
530We know that $\Gamma \cong \mathbb{D}_6$, and we know from the properties
531of the dihedral group (\ref{dihedral}) that the number of subgroups of
532$\mathbb{D}_6$ will be $d(6) + s(6) = 4 + 12 = 16$ subgroups.
533
534
535\vspace{0.4cm}
536
537\hspace*{-3.5cm}
538\begin{tabular}{ c c c c | p{7.5cm} }
539  \hline
540  generators & order & group & fixed field & notes (check fixed field)\\
541\hline
542  $\langle \rangle = \langle \sigma^6 \rangle=\langle \tau^2 \rangle$ & 1 & id & $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha,\zeta)$ & \\
543  $\langle \sigma \rangle = \langle \sigma^5 \rangle$ & 6 & $\mathbb{Z}_6$ & $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$ & \\
544  $\langle \sigma^2 \rangle=\langle \sigma^4 \rangle$ & 3 & $\mathbb{Z}_3$ & $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha^3, \zeta)$ & $\sigma^2(\alpha^3)=\alpha^3 \zeta^{3\cdot 2}=\alpha^3 \zeta^6 = \alpha^3 \cdot 1 = \alpha^3$\\
545  $\langle \sigma^3 \rangle$ & 2 & $\mathbb{Z}_2$ & $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha^2,\zeta)$ & $\sigma^3(\alpha^2)=(\alpha\zeta^3)^2=\alpha^2\zeta^6=\alpha^2$\\
546  \hline
547  $\langle \tau \rangle$ & 2 & $\mathbb{Z}_2$ & $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$ & \\
548  \hline
549  $\langle \sigma\tau \rangle$ & 2 & $\mathbb{Z}_2$ & $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha+\alpha\zeta)$ &
550      $\sigma\zeta(\alpha+\alpha\zeta)=\sigma(\alpha+\alpha\zeta^{-1}) = \alpha\zeta + \alpha\zeta^{-1}\zeta=\alpha\zeta+\alpha$\\
551  $\langle \sigma^2\tau \rangle$ & 2 & $\mathbb{Z}_2$ & $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha+\alpha\zeta^2), \mathbb{Q}(\alpha\zeta)$ &
552      $\sigma^2\tau(\alpha+\alpha\zeta^2) = \sigma(\alpha+\alpha\zeta^{-2})=\alpha\zeta^2+ \alpha\zeta^{-2}\zeta^2=\alpha\zeta^2+\alpha$\\
553  $\langle \sigma^3\tau \rangle$ & 2 & $\mathbb{Z}_2$ & $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha+\alpha\zeta^3)$ &
554      $\sigma^3\tau(\alpha+\alpha\zeta^3) = \sigma(\alpha+\alpha\zeta^{-3})=\alpha\zeta^3+ \alpha\zeta^{-3}\zeta^3=\alpha\zeta^3+\alpha$\\
555  $\langle \sigma^4\tau \rangle$ & 2 & $\mathbb{Z}_2$ & $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha+\alpha\zeta^4), \mathbb{Q}(\alpha\zeta^2)$ &
556      $\sigma^4\tau(\alpha+\alpha\zeta^4) = \sigma(\alpha+\alpha\zeta^{-4})=\alpha\zeta^4+ \alpha\zeta^{-4}\zeta^4=\alpha\zeta^4+\alpha$\\
557  $\langle \sigma^5\tau \rangle$ & 2 & $\mathbb{Z}_2$ & $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha+\alpha\zeta^5)$ &
558      $\sigma^5\tau(\alpha+\alpha\zeta^5) = \sigma(\alpha+\alpha\zeta^{-5})=\alpha\zeta^5+ \alpha\zeta^{-5}\zeta^5=\alpha\zeta^5+\alpha$\\
559  \hline
560  $\langle \sigma, \tau \rangle = \langle \sigma^5,\tau \rangle$ & $6\cdot2=12$ & $\mathbb{D}_6$ & $\mathbb{Q}$ & \\
561  $\langle \sigma^2, \tau \rangle = \langle \sigma^4,\tau \rangle$ & $3\cdot2=6$ & $\mathbb{D}_3$ & $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha^3)$ &
562      $\sigma^2(\alpha^3)=\alpha^3\zeta^{3\cdot 2}=\alpha^3$ and $\tau(\alpha^3)=\alpha^3$\\
563  $\langle \sigma^3, \tau \rangle$ & $2\cdot2=4$ & $\mathbb{D}_2$ & $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha^2)$ &
564      $\sigma^3(\alpha^2)=\alpha^2\zeta^{2\cdot 2}=\alpha^2$ and $\tau(\alpha^2)=\alpha^2$\\
565  \hline
566  $\langle \sigma^2, \sigma\tau \rangle$ & $3\cdot 2=6$ & $\mathbb{D}_3$ & $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha^3+\alpha^3\zeta^3)$ &
567      $\sigma^2(\alpha^3 + \alpha^3 \zeta^3) = \alpha^3\zeta^3 + \alpha^3 \zeta^3\zeta^3 = \alpha^3\zeta^3 + \alpha^3\zeta^6 = \alpha^3\zeta^3+\alpha^3$\\
568  $\langle \sigma^3, \sigma\tau \rangle$ & $2\cdot2=4$ & $\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2$ & $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha^2\zeta^2),\mathbb{Q}(\alpha^2+\alpha^2\zeta^2)$ &
569      $\sigma^3(\alpha^2+\alpha^2\zeta^2)=\alpha^2\zeta^{2\cdot3}+\alpha^2\zeta^{2\cdot3}\zeta^2=\alpha^2+\alpha^2\zeta^2$
570      and
571      $\sigma\tau(\alpha^2+\alpha^2\zeta^2)=\alpha^2\zeta^2+\alpha^2\zeta^{-2}\zeta^2 = \alpha^2\zeta^2+\alpha^2$\\
572  $\langle \sigma^3, \sigma^2\tau\rangle$ & $2\cdot2=4$ & $\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2$ & $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha^2\zeta^4),\mathbb{Q}(\alpha^2+\alpha^2\zeta^4)$ &
573      $\sigma^2\zeta(\alpha^2\zeta^4)=\alpha^2\zeta^2\zeta^{-4}=\alpha^2\zeta^{-2}=\alpha^2\zeta^4$
574      and $\sigma^3(\alpha^2\zeta^4)=\alpha^2\zeta^{2\cdot3}\zeta^4=\alpha^2\zeta^4$
575\end{tabular}
576
577
578
579\bibliographystyle{unsrt}
580\bibliography{galois-theory-notes.bib}
581
582\end{document}