\documentclass{article} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage{amsfonts} % \usepackage{yfonts} % WIP \usepackage{amsthm} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{enumerate} \usepackage{hyperref} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{tikz} % diagram \begin{filecontents}[overwrite]{algebraic-coding-theory-notes.bib} @misc{hill, author = {Raymond Hill}, title = {{A First Course in Coding Theory}}, year = {1986} } @misc{lint, author = {J.H. van Lint}, title = {{Introduction to Coding Theory}}, year = {1981} } \end{filecontents} \nocite{*} \theoremstyle{definition} \newtheorem{innerdefn}{Definition} \newenvironment{defn}[1] {\renewcommand\theinnerdefn{#1}\innerdefn} {\endinnerdefn} \newtheorem{innerthm}{Theorem} \newenvironment{thm}[1] {\renewcommand\theinnerthm{#1}\innerthm} {\endinnerthm} \newtheorem{innerlemma}{Lemma} \newenvironment{lemma}[1] {\renewcommand\theinnerlemma{#1}\innerlemma} {\endinnerlemma} \newtheorem{innerprop}{Proposition} \newenvironment{prop}[1] {\renewcommand\theinnerprop{#1}\innerprop} {\endinnerprop} \newtheorem{innercor}{Corollary} \newenvironment{cor}[1] {\renewcommand\theinnercor{#1}\innercor} {\endinnercor} \newtheorem{innereg}{Example} \newenvironment{eg}[1] {\renewcommand\theinnereg{#1}\innereg} {\endinnereg} \newtheorem{innerex}{Exercise} \newenvironment{ex}[1] {\renewcommand\theinnerex{#1}\innerex} {\endinnerex} % custom shortcuts \newcommand{\Vnq}{V(n, q)} \title{Algebraic Coding Theory} \author{arnaucube} \date{2026} \begin{document} \maketitle \begin{abstract} Notes taken while studying Algebraic Coding Theory, mostly from Hill book \cite{hill} and Lint book \cite{lint}. Usually while reading books and papers I take handwritten notes in a notebook, this document contains some of them re-written to $LaTeX$. The proofs may slightly differ from the ones from the books, since I try to extend them for a deeper understanding. \end{abstract} \tableofcontents \section{Vector spaces over finite fields, quick recap} Let $q$ be a prime power. $\Vnq$: set $GF(q)^n$ of all ordered $n$-tuples over $GF(q)$. $\Vnq$ is a vector space. A set of vectors $\{v_1, v_2, \ldots, v_r \}$ is said to be \emph{linear dependent} if $\exists$ scalars $a_1, \ldots, a_r$, not all zero, such that $$a_1 v_1 + a_2 v_2 + \ldots + a_r v_r = 0$$ They are \emph{linear independent} if $$a_1 v_1 + a_2 v_2 + \ldots + a_r v_r = 0 ~\stackrel{implies}{\Longrightarrow}~ a_1=a_2=\ldots=a_r=0$$ Let $C$ a subspace of $\Vnq$. Then a subset $\{v_1, v_2, \ldots, v_r \} \subseteq C$ is called a \emph{generating set} (or \emph{spanning set}) of $C$ if every vector in $C$ can be expressed as a linear combination of $v_1, \ldots, v_r$. A generating set of $C$ which is also linearly independent is called a \emph{basis} of $C$. \section{Linear codes} The theorems of this section are from \cite{hill} and follow the original enumeration of the book. \subsection{Some definitions} Let $q$ be a prime power. View $(Fq)^n$ as the vector space $\Vnq$. \begin{defn}{}[Linear code over GF(q)] A \emph{linear code over $GF(q)$} is a subspace of $\Vnq$, with $n \geq 0$. \end{defn} Thus $C \subseteq \Vnq$ is a linear code iff \begin{enumerate}[i.] \item $u+v \in C ~~ \forall u,v \in C$ \item $au \in C ~~ \forall u \in C,~ a \in GF(q)$ \end{enumerate} If $C$ is a $k$-dimensional subspace of $\Vnq$, then the linear code $C$ is called an $[n, k]$-code. (sometimes with minimum distance $d$: $[n, k, d]$-code). \begin{defn}{}[Weight] Weight, $w(x)$, of a vector $x \in \Vnq$ is the number of non-zero entries of $x$. \end{defn} \begin{lemma}{5.1}\label {h.5.1} if $x,y \in \Vnq$, then $d(x,y)=w(x-y)$. \end{lemma} \begin{proof} the vector $x-y$ has non-zero entries in preceisely those places where $x$ and $y$ differ. \end{proof} \begin{thm}{5.2} let $C$ a linear code, let $w(C)$ be the smallest of weights of the non-zero codewords of $C$. Then $d(C)=w(C)$. \end{thm} \begin{proof} $\exists~ x,y \in C$ s.th. $d(C)=d(x,y)$. By Lemma \ref{h.5.1}, $d(C)=w(x-y) \geq w(C)$, since $x-y$ is a codeword of the linear code $C$ (ie. $x-y \in C$). On the other hand, for $x \in C$,\\ $w(C)=w(x)=d(x,0) \geq d(C)$, since $0 \in C$. Hence, $d(C) \geq w(C)$ and $w(C) \geq d(C) ~~\Longrightarrow~ d(C)=w(C)$. \end{proof} \begin{defn}{}[Generator matrix (GM)] a $k \times n$ matrix whose rows form a basis of a linear $[n,k]$-code is called a \emph{generator matrix} (GM) of the code. \end{defn} \subsection{Equivalence} \begin{thm}{5.4} two known $k \times n$ matrices generate equivalent linear $[n,k]$-codes over $GF(q)$ if one matrix can be obtained from the other by a sequence of operations of the following types: \begin{enumerate} \item[R1.] permutation of the rows \item[R2.] multiplication of a row by a non-zero scalar \item[R3.] addition of a scalar multiple of one row to another \item[C1.] permutation of the columns \item[C2.] multiplication of any column by a non-zero scalar \end{enumerate} \end{thm} \begin{thm}{5.5} \label{h.5.5} let $G$ a GM of an $[n, k]$-code. Then by performing the previous operations, $G$ can be transformed to the standard form $[ I_k | A ]$ where $I_k$ is the $k \times k$ identity matrix, and $A$ is a $k \times (n-k)$ matrix. \end{thm} \subsection{Encoding with a linear code} Let $C$ a $[n,k]$-code over $GF(q)$ with GM $G$. $C$ contains $q^k$ codewords $\Longrightarrow$ can be used to comunicate any one of $q^k$ distinct messages. Iddentify these messages with the $q^k$ tuples of $V(k,q)$. Encoding:\\ msg vector: $u=u_1 u_2 \ldots u_k$; rows of $G$: $r_1 r_2 \ldots r_k$. Encode $$uG = \sum^k_{i=1} u_i r_i \in C$$ ie. $uG$ is a codeword of $C$; a linear combination of the rows of the GM. Encoding function: \begin{align*} V(k,q) &\longrightarrow C \subseteq \Vnq\\ u &\longmapsto uG \end{align*} If $G$ is in standard form (\ref{h.5.5}), $G= [I_k | A]$ with $A=[a_{ij}]$, then encoding $u$ is: $$x=uG = x_1x_2 \ldots x_k x_{k+1} \ldots x_n$$ where \begin{align*} &x_i=u_i ~~\text{for}~ 1 \leq i \leq k, ~\text{message digits}\\ &x_{k+i}=\sum^k_{j=1}~ a_ji u_j ~~\text{for}~ 1 \leq i \leq n-k, ~\text{check digits}\\ \end{align*} the check digits add redundancy to gie protection against noise. \subsection{Decoding with a linear code} Codeword $x=x_1 x_2 \ldots x_n$, received vector $y=y_1 y_2 \ldots y_n$, error vector $e = y-x=e_1 e_1 \ldots e_n$. \subsubsection{Cosets} Cosets here are similar to the ones from typical group theory, just from another perspective. \begin{defn}{}[Coset] Let $C$ a $[n,k]$-code over $GF(q)$ and $a \in \Vnq$. Then the set $a + C = \{a+x | x\in C\}$ is called a \emph{coset} of $C$. \end{defn} \begin{defn}{}[Coset leader] the vector having minimum weight in a coset is called the \emph{coset leader}. \end{defn} \begin{lemma}{6.3} \label{h.6.3} Let $a+C$ a coset of $C$ and $b \in a+C$. Then $b+C=a+C$. \end{lemma} \begin{proof} since $b \in a+C ~~\Longrightarrow~~ b=a+x$ for some $x \in C$. If $b+y \in b+C$ then $$b+y=(a+x)+y = a+(x+y) \in a+C$$ For the other direction, if $a+x \in a+C$ then $$a+x=(b-x)+z = b+(z-x) \in b+C$$ hence $a+C \subseteq b+C$. Therefore $b+C = a+C$. \end{proof} \begin{thm}{6.4}[Lagrange] \label{h.6.4} suppose $C \subseteq \Vnq$ is a $[n,k]$-code over $GF(q)$. Then \begin{enumerate}[i.] \item evvery vector of $\Vnq$ is in some coset of $C$ \item every coset contains exactly $q^k$ vectors \item two cosets either are disjoint or coincide (partial overlap is impossible) \end{enumerate} \end{thm} \begin{proof} \begin{enumerate}[i.] \item if $a\in \Vnq$ then $a=a+0 \in a+C$ \item the map \begin{align*} C &\longrightarrow a+C ~\forall~ x \in C\\ x &\longmapsto a+x \end{align*} is a one-to-one map, hence $|a+C| = |C| = q^k$. \item by contradiction, suppose cosets $a+C,~ b+C$ overlap. Then for some vector $v$, $$v \in (a+C) \cap (b+C)$$ thus for some $x,y \in C$, $v=a+x=b+y$. Hence $b=a+(x-y) \in a+C$, thus by Lemma \ref{h.6.3} we have $b+C=a+C$. \end{enumerate} \end{proof} \begin{cor}{} \ref{h.6.4} shows that $\Vnq$ is partitioned into disjoint cosets of $C$: $$\Vnq = (0+C) \cup (a_1+C) \cup \ldots \cup (a_s +C)$$ where $s=q^{n-k} -1$, and by Lemma \ref{h.6.3} we may take $0, a_1, \ldots, a_s$ to be coset leaders. \end{cor} \begin{eg}{6.5} \label{h.6.5} Let $C$ be the binary $[4,2]$-code with generator matrix $$ G = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} $$ ie. $C = \{0000,\, 1011,\, 0101,\, 1110\}$. Then the cosets of $C$ are \begin{align*} 0000 + C &= C \text{ itself}\\ 1000 + C &= \{1000,\, 0011,\, 1101,\, 0110\}\\ 0100 + C &= \{0100,\, 1111,\, 0001,\, 1010\} = 0001+C\\ 0010 + C &= \{0010,\, 1001,\, 0111,\, 1100\} \end{align*} by Lemma \ref{h.6.3}: $0001 \in 0100 + C$, thus $0001+C=0100+C$. \end{eg} \subsection{Probability of error correction (in binary linear codes)} To evaluate how good a code is, must calculate the \emph{probability} that a received vector will be decoded as the codeword which was sent. Let $p$ be the symbol error probability. Probability that the error vector is agiven vector of weight $i$ is $p^i (1-p){n-i}$. \begin{thm}{6.7} Let $C$ a binary $[n,k]$-code, and for $i=0,1,\ldots,n$ let $\alpha_i$ denote the number of coset leaders of weight $i$. Then the probability $P_{corr}(C)$ that a received vector decoded by means of a standard array is the codeword which was sent is $$P_{corr}(C) = \sum_{i=0}^n \alpha_i \cdot p^i(1-p)^{n-i}$$ \end{thm} \begin{eg}{6.8} $[n,k]$-code from \ref{h.6.5}, coset leaders are $0000, 1000, 0100, 0010$. Hence $\alpha_0=1,~ \alpha_1=3,~ \alpha_2=\alpha_3=\alpha_4=0$, so $$P_{corr}(C) = (1-p)^4 + 3 p(1-p)^3 = (1-p)^3 (1+2p)$$ \end{eg} \begin{lemma}{6.9}[Remark 6.9] if $d(C)=2t+1$ or $d(C)=2t+2$, then $C$ can correct any $t$ errors. Hence every vector of weight $\leq t$ is a coset leader and so $\alpha_i=\left( \stackrel{n}{i} \right)$ for $0 \leq i \leq t$. \end{lemma} \begin{defn}{}[Rate] $[n, k]$-code $C$ uses $n$ symbols to send $k$ message symbols; it has \emph{rate} $R(C)=k/n$. A good code will have a high rate. \end{defn} \begin{defn}{}[Capacity] the \emph{capacity} $\mathfrak{C}(p)$ of a binary symmetric channel with symbol error probability $p$ is $$\mathfrak{C}(p) = 1+ p \cdot \log_2{(p)} + (1-p) \cdot \log_2{(1-p)}$$ \end{defn} \begin{thm}{6.12}[Shanon's theorem] \end{thm} \bibliographystyle{unsrt} \bibliography{algebraic-coding-theory-notes.bib} \end{document}