|
|
@ -1,21 +1,25 @@ |
|
|
|
#![allow(non_snake_case)]
|
|
|
|
#![allow(non_camel_case_types)]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pub mod merkletree;
|
|
|
|
use merkletree::{MerkleTreePoseidon as MT, Params as MTParams};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use ark_ff::PrimeField;
|
|
|
|
use ark_poly::{univariate::DensePolynomial, UVPolynomial};
|
|
|
|
use ark_poly::{
|
|
|
|
univariate::DensePolynomial, EvaluationDomain, GeneralEvaluationDomain, UVPolynomial,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use ark_std::log2;
|
|
|
|
use ark_std::marker::PhantomData;
|
|
|
|
use ark_std::ops::Mul;
|
|
|
|
use ark_std::{rand::Rng, UniformRand};
|
|
|
|
use ark_std::{cfg_into_iter, rand::Rng, UniformRand};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pub struct FRI<F: PrimeField, P: UVPolynomial<F>> {
|
|
|
|
pub struct FRI_LDT<F: PrimeField, P: UVPolynomial<F>> {
|
|
|
|
_f: PhantomData<F>,
|
|
|
|
_poly: PhantomData<P>,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl<F: PrimeField, P: UVPolynomial<F>> FRI<F, P> {
|
|
|
|
impl<F: PrimeField, P: UVPolynomial<F>> FRI_LDT<F, P> {
|
|
|
|
pub fn new() -> Self {
|
|
|
|
Self {
|
|
|
|
_f: PhantomData,
|
|
|
@ -41,17 +45,41 @@ impl> FRI { |
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pub fn prove<R: Rng>(rng: &mut R, p: &P) -> (Vec<F>, Vec<F>, [F; 2]) {
|
|
|
|
// prove implements the proof generation for a FRI-low-degree-testing
|
|
|
|
pub fn prove<R: Rng>(rng: &mut R, p: &P) -> (Vec<F>, Vec<Vec<F>>, Vec<F>, [F; 2]) {
|
|
|
|
let d = p.degree();
|
|
|
|
let mut commitments: Vec<F> = Vec::new();
|
|
|
|
let mut mts: Vec<MT<F>> = Vec::new();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// f_0(x) = fL_0(x^2) + x fR_0(x^2)
|
|
|
|
let mut f_i1 = p.clone();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO challenge a_0
|
|
|
|
// sub_order = |F_i| = rho^-1 * d
|
|
|
|
let mut sub_order = d; // TMP, TODO this will depend on rho parameter
|
|
|
|
let mut eval_sub_domain: GeneralEvaluationDomain<F> =
|
|
|
|
GeneralEvaluationDomain::new(sub_order).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO merge in the next for loop
|
|
|
|
let evals: Vec<F> = cfg_into_iter!(0..eval_sub_domain.size())
|
|
|
|
.map(|k| f_i1.evaluate(&eval_sub_domain.element(k)))
|
|
|
|
.collect();
|
|
|
|
let (cm_i, mt_i) = MT::commit(&evals);
|
|
|
|
commitments.push(cm_i);
|
|
|
|
mts.push(mt_i);
|
|
|
|
sub_order = sub_order / 2;
|
|
|
|
eval_sub_domain = GeneralEvaluationDomain::new(sub_order).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// V sets rand z \in \mathbb{F} challenge
|
|
|
|
// TODO this will be a hash from the transcript
|
|
|
|
let z_pos = 3;
|
|
|
|
let z = eval_sub_domain.element(z_pos);
|
|
|
|
let z_pos = z_pos * 2; // WIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let mut f_is: Vec<P> = Vec::new();
|
|
|
|
f_is.push(p.clone());
|
|
|
|
let mut commitments: Vec<F> = Vec::new();
|
|
|
|
let mut mts: Vec<MT<F>> = Vec::new();
|
|
|
|
while f_i1.degree() > 1 {
|
|
|
|
let alpha_i = F::from(3_u64); // TODO: WIP, defined by Verifier (well, hash transcript)
|
|
|
|
let alpha_i = F::from(42_u64); // TODO: WIP, defined by Verifier (well, hash transcript)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let (fL_i, fR_i) = Self::split(&f_i1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -60,47 +88,71 @@ impl> FRI { |
|
|
|
f_i1 = fL_i.clone() + P::from_coefficients_slice(aux.mul(alpha_i).coeffs());
|
|
|
|
f_is.push(f_i1.clone());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let subdomain_evaluations: Vec<F> = cfg_into_iter!(0..eval_sub_domain.size())
|
|
|
|
.map(|k| f_i1.evaluate(&eval_sub_domain.element(k)))
|
|
|
|
.collect();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// commit to f_{i+1}(x) = fL_i(x) + alpha_i * fR_i(x)
|
|
|
|
let (cm_i, mt_i) = MT::commit(f_i1.coeffs());
|
|
|
|
let (cm_i, mt_i) = MT::commit(&subdomain_evaluations); // commit to the evaluation domain instead
|
|
|
|
commitments.push(cm_i);
|
|
|
|
mts.push(mt_i);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// prepare next subdomain
|
|
|
|
sub_order = sub_order / 2;
|
|
|
|
eval_sub_domain = GeneralEvaluationDomain::new(sub_order).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let (fL_i, fR_i) = Self::split(&f_i1);
|
|
|
|
let constant_fL_l: F = fL_i.coeffs()[0].clone();
|
|
|
|
let constant_fR_l: F = fR_i.coeffs()[0].clone();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO this will be a hash from the transcript
|
|
|
|
// V sets rand z \in \mathbb{F} challenge
|
|
|
|
let z = F::from(10_u64);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// evals = {f_i(z^{2^i}), f_i(-z^{2^i})} \forall i \in F_i
|
|
|
|
let mut evals: Vec<F> = Vec::new();
|
|
|
|
let mut mtproofs: Vec<Vec<F>> = Vec::new();
|
|
|
|
// TODO this will be done inside the prev loop, now it is here just for clarity
|
|
|
|
// evaluate f_i(z^{2^i})
|
|
|
|
// evaluate f_i(z^{2^i}), f_i(-z^{2^i}), and open their commitment
|
|
|
|
for i in 0..f_is.len() {
|
|
|
|
// TODO check usage of .pow(u64)
|
|
|
|
let z_2i = z.pow([2_u64.pow(i as u32)]); // z^{2^i}
|
|
|
|
let z_2i = z.pow([2_u64.pow(i as u32)]); // z^{2^i} // TODO check usage of .pow(u64)
|
|
|
|
let neg_z_2i = z_2i.neg();
|
|
|
|
let eval_i = f_is[i].evaluate(&z_2i);
|
|
|
|
evals.push(eval_i);
|
|
|
|
let eval_i = f_is[i].evaluate(&neg_z_2i);
|
|
|
|
evals.push(eval_i);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// gen the openings in the commitment to f_i(z^(2^i))
|
|
|
|
let mtproof = mts[i].open(F::from(z_pos as u32)); // WIP open to 2^i?
|
|
|
|
mtproofs.push(mtproof);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO return also the commitment_proofs
|
|
|
|
// return: Comm(f_i(x)), f_i(+-z^{2^i}), constant values {f_l^L, f_l^R}
|
|
|
|
(commitments, evals, [constant_fL_l, constant_fR_l])
|
|
|
|
(commitments, mtproofs, evals, [constant_fL_l, constant_fR_l])
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pub fn verify(commitments: Vec<F>, evals: Vec<F>, constants: [F; 2]) -> bool {
|
|
|
|
let z = F::from(10_u64); // TODO this will be a hash from the transcript
|
|
|
|
// verify implements the verification of a FRI-low-degree-testing proof
|
|
|
|
pub fn verify(
|
|
|
|
degree: usize, // expected degree
|
|
|
|
commitments: Vec<F>,
|
|
|
|
mtproofs: Vec<Vec<F>>,
|
|
|
|
evals: Vec<F>,
|
|
|
|
constants: [F; 2],
|
|
|
|
) -> bool {
|
|
|
|
let sub_order = ((degree + 1) / 2) - 1; // TMP, TODO this will depend on rho parameter
|
|
|
|
let eval_sub_domain: GeneralEvaluationDomain<F> =
|
|
|
|
GeneralEvaluationDomain::new(sub_order).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// TODO this will be a hash from the transcript
|
|
|
|
let z_pos = 3;
|
|
|
|
let z = eval_sub_domain.element(z_pos);
|
|
|
|
let z_pos = z_pos * 2;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO check commitments.len()==evals.len()/2
|
|
|
|
if commitments.len() != (evals.len() / 2) {
|
|
|
|
println!("sho commitments.len() != (evals.len() / 2) - 1");
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let mut i_z = 0;
|
|
|
|
for i in (0..evals.len()).step_by(2) {
|
|
|
|
let alpha_i = F::from(3_u64); // TODO: WIP, defined by Verifier (well, hash transcript)
|
|
|
|
let alpha_i = F::from(42_u64); // TODO: WIP, defined by Verifier (well, hash transcript)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let z_2i = z.pow([2_u64.pow((i as u32) / 2)]); // z^{2^i}
|
|
|
|
// take f_i(z^2) from evals
|
|
|
|
// take f_i(z^2) from evals
|
|
|
|
let z_2i = z.pow([2_u64.pow(i_z as u32)]); // z^{2^i}
|
|
|
|
let fi_z = evals[i];
|
|
|
|
let neg_fi_z = evals[i + 1];
|
|
|
|
// compute f_i^L(z^2), f_i^R(z^2) from the linear combination
|
|
|
@ -113,27 +165,39 @@ impl> FRI { |
|
|
|
// check: obtained f_{i+1}(z^2) == evals.f_{i+1}(z^2) (=evals[i+2])
|
|
|
|
if i < evals.len() - 2 {
|
|
|
|
if next_fi_z2 != evals[i + 2] {
|
|
|
|
println!("\nerr, i={:?}", i);
|
|
|
|
println!(" next_fi^z2 {:?}", next_fi_z2.to_string());
|
|
|
|
println!(" e[i] {:?}", evals[i + 2].to_string());
|
|
|
|
panic!("should f_i+1(z^2) == evals.f_i+1(z^2) (=evals[i+2])");
|
|
|
|
println!(
|
|
|
|
"verify step i={}, should f_i+1(z^2) == evals.f_i+1(z^2) (=evals[i+2])",
|
|
|
|
i
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// check commitment opening
|
|
|
|
// TODO
|
|
|
|
if !MT::verify(
|
|
|
|
commitments[i_z],
|
|
|
|
// F::from(i as u32),
|
|
|
|
F::from(z_pos as u32),
|
|
|
|
evals[i],
|
|
|
|
mtproofs[i_z].clone(),
|
|
|
|
) {
|
|
|
|
println!("verify step i={}, MT::verify failed", i);
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// last iteration, check constant values equal to the obtained f_i^L(z^{2^i}),
|
|
|
|
// f_i^R(z^{2^i})
|
|
|
|
if i == evals.len() - 2 {
|
|
|
|
if L != constants[0] {
|
|
|
|
panic!("constant L not equal");
|
|
|
|
println!("constant L not equal to the obtained one");
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if R != constants[1] {
|
|
|
|
println!("R {:?}\n {:?}", R.to_string(), constants[1].to_string());
|
|
|
|
panic!("constant R not equal");
|
|
|
|
println!("constant R not equal to the obtained one");
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
i_z += 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
true
|
|
|
@ -156,8 +220,8 @@ mod tests { |
|
|
|
let p = DensePolynomial::<Fr>::rand(deg, &mut rng);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(p.degree(), deg);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type FRIC = FRI<Fr, DensePolynomial<Fr>>;
|
|
|
|
let (pL, pR) = FRIC::split(&p);
|
|
|
|
type FRIT = FRI_LDT<Fr, DensePolynomial<Fr>>;
|
|
|
|
let (pL, pR) = FRIT::split(&p);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// check that f(z) == fL(x^2) + x * fR(x^2), for a rand z
|
|
|
|
let z = Fr::rand(&mut rng);
|
|
|
@ -176,14 +240,21 @@ mod tests { |
|
|
|
assert_eq!(p.degree(), deg);
|
|
|
|
// println!("p {:?}", p);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type FRIC = FRI<Fr, DensePolynomial<Fr>>;
|
|
|
|
type FRIT = FRI_LDT<Fr, DensePolynomial<Fr>>;
|
|
|
|
// prover
|
|
|
|
let (commitments, evals, constvals) = FRIC::prove(&mut rng, &p);
|
|
|
|
let (commitments, mtproofs, evals, constvals) = FRIT::prove(&mut rng, &p);
|
|
|
|
// commitments contains the commitments to each f_0, f_1, ..., f_n, with n=log2(d)
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(commitments.len(), log2(p.coeffs().len()) as usize - 1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(commitments.len(), log2(p.coeffs().len()) as usize);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(evals.len(), 2 * log2(p.coeffs().len()) as usize);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let v = FRIC::verify(commitments, evals, constvals);
|
|
|
|
let v = FRIT::verify(
|
|
|
|
// Fr::from(deg as u32),
|
|
|
|
deg,
|
|
|
|
commitments,
|
|
|
|
mtproofs,
|
|
|
|
evals,
|
|
|
|
constvals,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert!(v);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|