Browse Source

Optimize verifier eq (#102)

* wip we need to be able to do batch opening for different poly sizes or pad poly with zeros

* fix small public inputs. Only works for pow2 pubinput

Co-authored-by: Charles Chen <chancharles92@gmail.com>
main
Benedikt Bünz 2 years ago
committed by GitHub
parent
commit
768db4eb04
No known key found for this signature in database GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
8 changed files with 56 additions and 22 deletions
  1. +3
    -1
      arithmetic/src/lib.rs
  2. +17
    -0
      arithmetic/src/virtual_polynomial.rs
  3. +0
    -1
      hyperplonk/Cargo.toml
  4. +11
    -5
      hyperplonk/src/mock.rs
  5. +13
    -8
      hyperplonk/src/snark.rs
  6. +7
    -0
      hyperplonk/src/utils.rs
  7. +2
    -0
      subroutines/src/poly_iop/sum_check/verifier.rs
  8. +3
    -7
      subroutines/src/poly_iop/zero_check/mod.rs

+ 3
- 1
arithmetic/src/lib.rs

@ -12,4 +12,6 @@ pub use multilinear_polynomial::{
};
pub use univariate_polynomial::{build_l, get_uni_domain};
pub use util::{bit_decompose, gen_eval_point, get_batched_nv, get_index};
pub use virtual_polynomial::{build_eq_x_r, build_eq_x_r_vec, VPAuxInfo, VirtualPolynomial};
pub use virtual_polynomial::{
build_eq_x_r, build_eq_x_r_vec, eq_eval, VPAuxInfo, VirtualPolynomial,
};

+ 17
- 0
arithmetic/src/virtual_polynomial.rs

@ -325,6 +325,23 @@ impl VirtualPolynomial {
}
}
/// Evaluate eq polynomial.
pub fn eq_eval<F: PrimeField>(x: &[F], y: &[F]) -> Result<F, ArithErrors> {
if x.len() != y.len() {
return Err(ArithErrors::InvalidParameters(
"x and y have different length".to_string(),
));
}
let start = start_timer!(|| "eq_eval");
let mut res = F::one();
for (&xi, &yi) in x.iter().zip(y.iter()) {
let xi_yi = xi * yi;
res *= xi_yi + xi_yi - xi - yi + F::one();
}
end_timer!(start);
Ok(res)
}
/// This function build the eq(x, r) polynomial for any given r.
///
/// Evaluate

+ 0
- 1
hyperplonk/Cargo.toml

@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ rayon = { version = "1.5.2", default-features = false, optional = true }
[dev-dependencies]
ark-bls12-381 = { version = "0.3.0", default-features = false, features = [ "curve" ] }
# Benchmarks
[[bench]]
name = "hyperplonk-benches"

+ 11
- 5
hyperplonk/src/mock.rs

@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ use crate::{
};
pub struct MockCircuit<F: PrimeField> {
pub public_inputs: Vec<F>,
pub witnesses: Vec<WitnessColumn<F>>,
pub index: HyperPlonkIndex<F>,
}
@ -85,10 +86,12 @@ impl MockCircuit {
witnesses[i].append(cur_witness[i]);
}
}
let pub_input_len = ark_std::cmp::min(4, num_constraints);
let public_inputs = witnesses[0].0[0..pub_input_len].to_vec();
let params = HyperPlonkParams {
num_constraints,
num_pub_input: num_constraints,
num_pub_input: public_inputs.len(),
gate_func: gate.clone(),
};
@ -99,7 +102,11 @@ impl MockCircuit {
selectors,
};
Self { witnesses, index }
Self {
public_inputs,
witnesses,
index,
}
}
pub fn is_satisfied(&self) -> bool {
@ -177,7 +184,6 @@ mod test {
assert!(circuit.is_satisfied());
let index = circuit.index;
// generate pk and vks
let (pk, vk) =
<PolyIOP<Fr> as HyperPlonkSNARK<Bls12_381, MultilinearKzgPCS<Bls12_381>>>::preprocess(
@ -187,14 +193,14 @@ mod test {
let proof =
<PolyIOP<Fr> as HyperPlonkSNARK<Bls12_381, MultilinearKzgPCS<Bls12_381>>>::prove(
&pk,
&circuit.witnesses[0].0,
&circuit.public_inputs,
&circuit.witnesses,
)?;
let verify =
<PolyIOP<Fr> as HyperPlonkSNARK<Bls12_381, MultilinearKzgPCS<Bls12_381>>>::verify(
&vk,
&circuit.witnesses[0].0,
&circuit.public_inputs,
&proof,
)?;
assert!(verify);

+ 13
- 8
hyperplonk/src/snark.rs

@ -324,8 +324,11 @@ where
// - 4.4. public input consistency checks
// - pi_poly(r_pi) where r_pi is sampled from transcript
let r_pi = transcript.get_and_append_challenge_vectors(b"r_pi", ell)?;
let tmp_point = [vec![E::Fr::zero(); num_vars - ell], r_pi].concat();
pcs_acc.insert_poly_and_points(&witness_polys[0], &witness_commits[0], &tmp_point);
// padded with zeros
let r_pi_padded = [r_pi, vec![E::Fr::zero(); num_vars - ell]].concat();
// Evaluate witness_poly[0] at r_pi||0s which is equal to public_input evaluated
// at r_pi. Assumes that public_input is a power of 2
pcs_acc.insert_poly_and_points(&witness_polys[0], &witness_commits[0], &r_pi_padded);
end_timer!(step);
// =======================================================================
@ -515,7 +518,7 @@ where
// =======================================================================
// 3. Verify the opening against the commitment
// =======================================================================
let step = start_timer!(|| "verify commitments");
let step = start_timer!(|| "assemble commitments");
// generate evaluation points and commitments
let mut comms = vec![];
@ -535,7 +538,6 @@ where
points.push(perm_check_point_0.clone());
points.push(perm_check_point_1.clone());
points.push(prod_final_query_point);
// frac(x)'s points
comms.push(proof.perm_check_proof.frac_comm);
comms.push(proof.perm_check_proof.frac_comm);
@ -575,21 +577,24 @@ where
// - 4.4. public input consistency checks
// - pi_poly(r_pi) where r_pi is sampled from transcript
let r_pi = transcript.get_and_append_challenge_vectors(b"r_pi", ell)?;
let tmp_point = [vec![E::Fr::zero(); num_vars - ell], r_pi].concat();
// check public evaluation
let pi_poly = DenseMultilinearExtension::from_evaluations_slice(ell as usize, pub_input);
let expect_pi_eval = evaluate_opt(&pi_poly, &tmp_point[..]);
let expect_pi_eval = evaluate_opt(&pi_poly, &r_pi[..]);
if expect_pi_eval != *pi_eval {
return Err(HyperPlonkErrors::InvalidProver(format!(
"Public input eval mismatch: got {}, expect {}",
pi_eval, expect_pi_eval,
)));
}
comms.push(proof.witness_commits[0]);
points.push(tmp_point);
let r_pi_padded = [r_pi, vec![E::Fr::zero(); num_vars - ell]].concat();
comms.push(proof.witness_commits[0]);
points.push(r_pi_padded);
assert_eq!(comms.len(), proof.batch_openings.f_i_eval_at_point_i.len());
end_timer!(step);
let step = start_timer!(|| "PCS batch verify");
// check proof
let res = PCS::batch_verify(
&vk.pcs_param,

+ 7
- 0
hyperplonk/src/utils.rs

@ -137,6 +137,13 @@ pub(crate) fn prover_sanity_check(
params.num_pub_input
)));
}
if !pub_input.len().is_power_of_two() {
return Err(HyperPlonkErrors::InvalidProver(format!(
"Public input length is not power of two: got {}",
pub_input.len(),
)));
}
// witnesses length
for (i, w) in witnesses.iter().enumerate() {
if w.0.len() != params.num_constraints {

+ 2
- 0
subroutines/src/poly_iop/sum_check/verifier.rs

@ -178,6 +178,8 @@ impl SumCheckVerifier for IOPVerifierState {
/// This implementation is linear in number of inputs in terms of field
/// operations. It also has a quadratic term in primitive operations which is
/// negligible compared to field operations.
/// TODO: The quadratic term can be removed by precomputing the lagrange
/// coefficients.
fn interpolate_uni_poly<F: PrimeField>(p_i: &[F], eval_at: F) -> Result<F, PolyIOPErrors> {
let start = start_timer!(|| "sum check interpolate uni poly opt");

+ 3
- 7
subroutines/src/poly_iop/zero_check/mod.rs

@ -3,9 +3,8 @@
use std::fmt::Debug;
use crate::poly_iop::{errors::PolyIOPErrors, sum_check::SumCheck, PolyIOP};
use arithmetic::build_eq_x_r;
use arithmetic::eq_eval;
use ark_ff::PrimeField;
use ark_poly::MultilinearExtension;
use ark_std::{end_timer, start_timer};
use transcript::IOPTranscript;
@ -103,11 +102,8 @@ impl ZeroCheck for PolyIOP {
// expected_eval = sumcheck.expect_eval/eq(v, r)
// where v = sum_check_sub_claim.point
let eq_x_r = build_eq_x_r(&r)?;
let expected_evaluation = sum_subclaim.expected_evaluation
/ eq_x_r.evaluate(&sum_subclaim.point).ok_or_else(|| {
PolyIOPErrors::InvalidParameters("evaluation dimension does not match".to_string())
})?;
let eq_x_r_eval = eq_eval(&sum_subclaim.point, &r)?;
let expected_evaluation = sum_subclaim.expected_evaluation / eq_x_r_eval;
end_timer!(start);
Ok(ZeroCheckSubClaim {

Loading…
Cancel
Save