mirror of
https://github.com/arnaucube/nova-study.git
synced 2026-01-08 15:11:30 +01:00
add NIFS interface, add commitments related methods
This commit is contained in:
@@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ Implementation of [Nova](https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/370.pdf) using [arkworks-r
|
||||
|
||||
This repo is an ongoing implementation, the code will be dirty for a while and not optimized but just to understand and experiment with the internals of the scheme and try experimental combinations.
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks to [levs57](https://twitter.com/levs57) for clarifications on the Nova folding.
|
||||
Thanks to [Levs57](https://twitter.com/levs57), [Nalin Bhardwaj](https://twitter.com/nibnalin) and [Carlos](https://twitter.com/cperezz19) for clarifications on the Nova paper.
|
||||
|
||||
335
src/nifs.rs
335
src/nifs.rs
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ use ark_ec::AffineRepr;
|
||||
use ark_std::{One, Zero};
|
||||
use std::marker::PhantomData;
|
||||
|
||||
use crate::pedersen::{Commitment, Params as PedersenParams, Pedersen};
|
||||
use crate::pedersen::{Commitment, Params as PedersenParams, Pedersen, Proof as PedersenProof};
|
||||
use crate::r1cs::*;
|
||||
use crate::transcript::Transcript;
|
||||
use crate::utils::*;
|
||||
@@ -53,14 +53,15 @@ pub struct NIFS<C: AffineRepr> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<C: AffineRepr> NIFS<C> {
|
||||
// comp_T: compute cross-terms T
|
||||
pub fn comp_T(
|
||||
cs1: &RelaxedR1CS<C::ScalarField>,
|
||||
cs2: &RelaxedR1CS<C::ScalarField>,
|
||||
r1cs: &R1CS<C::ScalarField>,
|
||||
u1: C::ScalarField,
|
||||
u2: C::ScalarField,
|
||||
z1: &Vec<C::ScalarField>,
|
||||
z2: &Vec<C::ScalarField>,
|
||||
) -> Vec<C::ScalarField> {
|
||||
// assuming cs1.R1CS == cs2.R1CS
|
||||
let (A, B, C) = (cs1.ABC.A.clone(), cs1.ABC.B.clone(), cs1.ABC.C.clone());
|
||||
let (A, B, C) = (r1cs.A.clone(), r1cs.B.clone(), r1cs.C.clone());
|
||||
|
||||
// this is parallelizable (for the future)
|
||||
let Az1 = matrix_vector_product(&A, &z1);
|
||||
@@ -72,8 +73,8 @@ impl<C: AffineRepr> NIFS<C> {
|
||||
|
||||
let Az1_Bz2 = hadamard_product(Az1, Bz2);
|
||||
let Az2_Bz1 = hadamard_product(Az2, Bz1);
|
||||
let u1Cz2 = vector_elem_product(&Cz2, &cs1.u);
|
||||
let u2Cz1 = vector_elem_product(&Cz1, &cs2.u);
|
||||
let u1Cz2 = vector_elem_product(&Cz2, &u1);
|
||||
let u2Cz1 = vector_elem_product(&Cz1, &u2);
|
||||
|
||||
// let T = vec_sub(vec_sub(vec_add(Az1_Bz2, Az2_Bz1), u1Cz2), u2Cz1);
|
||||
let T = ((Ve(Az1_Bz2) + Ve(Az2_Bz1)) - Ve(u1Cz2)) - Ve(u2Cz1);
|
||||
@@ -84,10 +85,9 @@ impl<C: AffineRepr> NIFS<C> {
|
||||
r: C::ScalarField,
|
||||
fw1: &FWit<C>,
|
||||
fw2: &FWit<C>,
|
||||
T: Vec<C::ScalarField>,
|
||||
T: &Vec<C::ScalarField>,
|
||||
rT: C::ScalarField,
|
||||
) -> FWit<C> {
|
||||
// TODO compute T inside this method, and output cmT to be later inputed into fold_instance
|
||||
let r2 = r * r;
|
||||
let E: Vec<C::ScalarField> = vec_add(
|
||||
// this syntax will be simplified with future operators impl (or at least a method
|
||||
@@ -108,9 +108,9 @@ impl<C: AffineRepr> NIFS<C> {
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn fold_instance(
|
||||
r: C::ScalarField,
|
||||
phi1: Phi<C>,
|
||||
phi2: Phi<C>,
|
||||
cmT: Commitment<C>,
|
||||
phi1: &Phi<C>,
|
||||
phi2: &Phi<C>,
|
||||
cmT: &Commitment<C>,
|
||||
) -> Phi<C> {
|
||||
let r2 = r * r;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -127,6 +127,96 @@ impl<C: AffineRepr> NIFS<C> {
|
||||
x,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// NIFS.P
|
||||
pub fn P(
|
||||
tr: &mut Transcript<C::ScalarField>,
|
||||
pedersen_params: &PedersenParams<C>,
|
||||
r: C::ScalarField,
|
||||
r1cs: &R1CS<C::ScalarField>,
|
||||
fw1: FWit<C>,
|
||||
fw2: FWit<C>,
|
||||
) -> (FWit<C>, Phi<C>, Phi<C>, Vec<C::ScalarField>, Commitment<C>) {
|
||||
// compute committed instances
|
||||
let phi1 = fw1.commit(&pedersen_params); // wip
|
||||
let phi2 = fw2.commit(&pedersen_params);
|
||||
|
||||
// compute cross terms
|
||||
let T = Self::comp_T(&r1cs, phi1.u, phi2.u, &fw1.W, &fw2.W);
|
||||
let rT = tr.get_challenge(b"rT");
|
||||
let cmT = Pedersen::commit(&pedersen_params, &T, &rT);
|
||||
|
||||
// fold witness
|
||||
let fw3 = NIFS::<C>::fold_witness(r, &fw1, &fw2, &T, rT);
|
||||
|
||||
// fold committed instancs
|
||||
// let phi3 = NIFS::<C>::fold_instance(r, &phi1, &phi2, &cmT);
|
||||
return (fw3, phi1, phi2, T, cmT); // maybe return phi3
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// NIFS.V
|
||||
pub fn V(r: C::ScalarField, phi1: &Phi<C>, phi2: &Phi<C>, cmT: &Commitment<C>) -> Phi<C> {
|
||||
NIFS::<C>::fold_instance(r, &phi1, &phi2, &cmT)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// verify commited folded instance (phi) relations
|
||||
pub fn verify(
|
||||
r: C::ScalarField,
|
||||
phi1: &Phi<C>,
|
||||
phi2: &Phi<C>,
|
||||
phi3: &Phi<C>,
|
||||
cmT: &Commitment<C>,
|
||||
) -> bool {
|
||||
let r2 = r * r;
|
||||
if phi3.cmE.0 != (phi1.cmE.0 + cmT.0.mul(r) + phi2.cmE.0.mul(r2)).into() {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if phi3.u != phi1.u + r * phi2.u {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if phi3.cmW.0 != (phi1.cmW.0 + phi2.cmW.0.mul(r)).into() {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if phi3.x != vec_add(&phi1.x, &vector_elem_product(&phi2.x, &r)) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
true
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn open_commitments(
|
||||
tr: &mut Transcript<C::ScalarField>,
|
||||
pedersen_params: &PedersenParams<C>,
|
||||
fw: &FWit<C>,
|
||||
phi: &Phi<C>,
|
||||
T: Vec<C::ScalarField>,
|
||||
rT: C::ScalarField,
|
||||
cmT: &Commitment<C>,
|
||||
) -> (PedersenProof<C>, PedersenProof<C>, PedersenProof<C>) {
|
||||
let cmE_proof = Pedersen::prove(&pedersen_params, tr, &phi.cmE, &fw.E, &fw.rE);
|
||||
let cmW_proof = Pedersen::prove(&pedersen_params, tr, &phi.cmW, &fw.W, &fw.rW);
|
||||
let cmT_proof = Pedersen::prove(&pedersen_params, tr, &cmT, &T, &rT);
|
||||
(cmE_proof, cmW_proof, cmT_proof)
|
||||
}
|
||||
pub fn verify_commitments(
|
||||
tr: &mut Transcript<C::ScalarField>,
|
||||
pedersen_params: &PedersenParams<C>,
|
||||
phi: Phi<C>,
|
||||
cmT: Commitment<C>,
|
||||
cmE_proof: PedersenProof<C>,
|
||||
cmW_proof: PedersenProof<C>,
|
||||
cmT_proof: PedersenProof<C>,
|
||||
) -> bool {
|
||||
if !Pedersen::verify(&pedersen_params, tr, phi.cmE, cmE_proof) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !Pedersen::verify(&pedersen_params, tr, phi.cmW, cmW_proof) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !Pedersen::verify(&pedersen_params, tr, cmT, cmT_proof) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
true
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
@@ -145,8 +235,7 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
fn gen_test_values<R: Rng>(
|
||||
rng: &mut R,
|
||||
) -> (
|
||||
RelaxedR1CS<Fr>,
|
||||
RelaxedR1CS<Fr>,
|
||||
R1CS<Fr>,
|
||||
Vec<Fr>,
|
||||
Vec<Fr>,
|
||||
Vec<Fr>,
|
||||
@@ -175,61 +264,49 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
vec![0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0],
|
||||
]);
|
||||
// TODO in the future update this method to generate witness, and generate n witnesses
|
||||
// instances
|
||||
let z1 = to_F_vec::<Fr>(vec![1, 3, 35, 9, 27, 30]);
|
||||
// instances, x: pub
|
||||
let w1 = to_F_vec::<Fr>(vec![1, 3, 35, 9, 27, 30]);
|
||||
let x1 = to_F_vec::<Fr>(vec![35]);
|
||||
let z2 = to_F_vec::<Fr>(vec![1, 4, 73, 16, 64, 68]);
|
||||
let w2 = to_F_vec::<Fr>(vec![1, 4, 73, 16, 64, 68]);
|
||||
let x2 = to_F_vec::<Fr>(vec![73]);
|
||||
// let z3 = to_F_vec::<Fr>(vec![1, 4, 73, 16, 64, 68]);
|
||||
// let x3 = to_F_vec::<Fr>(vec![73]);
|
||||
let z3 = to_F_vec::<Fr>(vec![1, 5, 135, 25, 125, 130]);
|
||||
let w3 = to_F_vec::<Fr>(vec![1, 5, 135, 25, 125, 130]);
|
||||
let x3 = to_F_vec::<Fr>(vec![135]);
|
||||
|
||||
let relaxed_r1cs_1 = R1CS::<Fr> {
|
||||
let r1cs = R1CS::<Fr> {
|
||||
A: A.clone(),
|
||||
B: B.clone(),
|
||||
C: C.clone(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
.relax();
|
||||
let relaxed_r1cs_2 = R1CS::<Fr> {
|
||||
A: A.clone(),
|
||||
B: B.clone(),
|
||||
C: C.clone(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
.relax();
|
||||
(relaxed_r1cs_1, relaxed_r1cs_2, z1, z2, z3, x1, x2, x3)
|
||||
};
|
||||
(r1cs, w1, w2, w3, x1, x2, x3)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// fold 2 instances into one
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_one_fold() {
|
||||
let mut rng = ark_std::test_rng();
|
||||
let (relaxed_r1cs_1, relaxed_r1cs_2, z1, z2, _, x1, x2, _) = gen_test_values(&mut rng);
|
||||
let (A, B, C) = (
|
||||
relaxed_r1cs_1.ABC.A.clone(),
|
||||
relaxed_r1cs_1.ABC.B.clone(),
|
||||
relaxed_r1cs_1.ABC.C.clone(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let T = NIFS::<G1Affine>::comp_T(&relaxed_r1cs_1, &relaxed_r1cs_2, &z1, &z2);
|
||||
let pedersen_params = Pedersen::<G1Affine>::new_params(&mut rng, 100); // 100 is wip, will get it from actual vec
|
||||
let rT: Fr = Fr::rand(&mut rng);
|
||||
let cmT = Pedersen::commit(&pedersen_params, &T, &rT);
|
||||
|
||||
let (r1cs, w1, w2, _, x1, x2, _) = gen_test_values(&mut rng);
|
||||
let (A, B, C) = (r1cs.A.clone(), r1cs.B.clone(), r1cs.C.clone());
|
||||
|
||||
let r = Fr::rand(&mut rng); // this would come from the transcript
|
||||
|
||||
let fw1 = FWit::<G1Affine>::new(z1, A.len());
|
||||
let fw2 = FWit::<G1Affine>::new(z2, A.len());
|
||||
|
||||
// fold witness
|
||||
let fw3 = NIFS::<G1Affine>::fold_witness(r, &fw1, &fw2, T, rT);
|
||||
let fw1 = FWit::<G1Affine>::new(w1.clone(), A.len());
|
||||
let fw2 = FWit::<G1Affine>::new(w2.clone(), A.len());
|
||||
|
||||
// get committed instances
|
||||
let phi1 = fw1.commit(&pedersen_params); // wip
|
||||
let phi2 = fw2.commit(&pedersen_params);
|
||||
|
||||
let T = NIFS::<G1Affine>::comp_T(&r1cs, phi1.u, phi2.u, &w1, &w2);
|
||||
let rT: Fr = Fr::rand(&mut rng);
|
||||
let cmT = Pedersen::commit(&pedersen_params, &T, &rT);
|
||||
|
||||
// fold witness
|
||||
let fw3 = NIFS::<G1Affine>::fold_witness(r, &fw1, &fw2, &T, rT);
|
||||
|
||||
// fold instance
|
||||
let phi3 = NIFS::<G1Affine>::fold_instance(r, phi1, phi2, cmT);
|
||||
let phi3 = NIFS::<G1Affine>::fold_instance(r, &phi1, &phi2, &cmT);
|
||||
|
||||
// naive check that the folded witness satisfies the relaxed r1cs
|
||||
let Az = matrix_vector_product(&A, &fw3.W);
|
||||
@@ -246,38 +323,32 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
assert_eq!(phi3_expected.cmE.0, phi3.cmE.0);
|
||||
assert_eq!(phi3_expected.cmW.0, phi3.cmW.0);
|
||||
|
||||
// NIFS.Verify:
|
||||
assert!(NIFS::<G1Affine>::verify(r, &phi1, &phi2, &phi3, &cmT));
|
||||
|
||||
// init Prover's transcript
|
||||
let mut transcript_p: Transcript<Fr> = Transcript::<Fr>::new();
|
||||
// init Verifier's transcript
|
||||
let mut transcript_v: Transcript<Fr> = Transcript::<Fr>::new();
|
||||
|
||||
// check openings of phi3.cmE and phi3.cmW
|
||||
let phi3_cmE_proof = Pedersen::prove(
|
||||
&pedersen_params,
|
||||
// check openings of phi3.cmE, phi3.cmW and cmT
|
||||
let (cmE_proof, cmW_proof, cmT_proof) = NIFS::<G1Affine>::open_commitments(
|
||||
&mut transcript_p,
|
||||
&phi3.cmE,
|
||||
fw3.E,
|
||||
fw3.rE,
|
||||
);
|
||||
let v = Pedersen::verify(
|
||||
&pedersen_params,
|
||||
&fw3,
|
||||
&phi3,
|
||||
T,
|
||||
rT,
|
||||
&cmT,
|
||||
);
|
||||
let v = NIFS::<G1Affine>::verify_commitments(
|
||||
&mut transcript_v,
|
||||
phi3.cmE,
|
||||
phi3_cmE_proof,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let phi3_cmW_proof = Pedersen::prove(
|
||||
&pedersen_params,
|
||||
&mut transcript_p,
|
||||
&phi3.cmW,
|
||||
fw3.W,
|
||||
fw3.rW,
|
||||
);
|
||||
let v = Pedersen::verify(
|
||||
&pedersen_params,
|
||||
&mut transcript_v,
|
||||
phi3.cmW,
|
||||
phi3_cmW_proof,
|
||||
phi3,
|
||||
cmT,
|
||||
cmE_proof,
|
||||
cmW_proof,
|
||||
cmT_proof,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -287,53 +358,47 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
let mut rng = ark_std::test_rng();
|
||||
let pedersen_params = Pedersen::<G1Affine>::new_params(&mut rng, 6);
|
||||
|
||||
let (relaxed_r1cs_1, relaxed_r1cs_2, z1, z2, z3, x1, x2, x3) = gen_test_values(&mut rng);
|
||||
let (r1cs, w1, w2, w3, x1, x2, x3) = gen_test_values(&mut rng);
|
||||
|
||||
let T_12 = NIFS::<G1Affine>::comp_T(&relaxed_r1cs_1, &relaxed_r1cs_2, &z1, &z2);
|
||||
let u1: Fr = Fr::one();
|
||||
let u2: Fr = Fr::one();
|
||||
|
||||
let T_12 = NIFS::<G1Affine>::comp_T(&r1cs, u1, u2, &w1, &w2);
|
||||
let rT_12: Fr = Fr::rand(&mut rng);
|
||||
let cmT_12 = Pedersen::commit(&pedersen_params, &T_12, &rT_12);
|
||||
|
||||
// let r = Fr::rand(&mut rng); // this would come from the transcript
|
||||
let r = Fr::from(3_u32);
|
||||
let r = Fr::rand(&mut rng); // this would come from the transcript
|
||||
|
||||
let fw1 = FWit::<G1Affine>::new(z1, T_12.len());
|
||||
let fw2 = FWit::<G1Affine>::new(z2, T_12.len());
|
||||
let fw1 = FWit::<G1Affine>::new(w1, T_12.len());
|
||||
let fw2 = FWit::<G1Affine>::new(w2, T_12.len());
|
||||
|
||||
// fold witness
|
||||
let fw_12 = NIFS::<G1Affine>::fold_witness(r, &fw1, &fw2, T_12, rT_12);
|
||||
let fw_12 = NIFS::<G1Affine>::fold_witness(r, &fw1, &fw2, &T_12, rT_12);
|
||||
|
||||
// get committed instances
|
||||
let phi1 = fw1.commit(&pedersen_params); // wip
|
||||
let phi2 = fw2.commit(&pedersen_params);
|
||||
|
||||
// fold instance
|
||||
let phi_12 = NIFS::<G1Affine>::fold_instance(r, phi1, phi2, cmT_12);
|
||||
let phi_12 = NIFS::<G1Affine>::fold_instance(r, &phi1, &phi2, &cmT_12);
|
||||
|
||||
// NIFS.Verify:
|
||||
assert!(NIFS::<G1Affine>::verify(r, &phi1, &phi2, &phi_12, &cmT_12));
|
||||
|
||||
//----
|
||||
// 2nd fold
|
||||
// tmp: set relaxed_r1cs instances
|
||||
let relaxed_r1cs_12 = RelaxedR1CS::<Fr> {
|
||||
ABC: relaxed_r1cs_1.ABC,
|
||||
u: phi_12.u,
|
||||
E: Fr::zero(), // not used in comp_T. TODO update RelaxedR1CS & comp_T to work different
|
||||
};
|
||||
let relaxed_r1cs_3 = RelaxedR1CS::<Fr> {
|
||||
ABC: relaxed_r1cs_2.ABC,
|
||||
u: Fr::one(), // as this is a non-yet-folded instance
|
||||
E: Fr::zero(),
|
||||
};
|
||||
let fw3 = FWit::<G1Affine>::new(z3, relaxed_r1cs_3.ABC.A.len());
|
||||
let fw3 = FWit::<G1Affine>::new(w3, r1cs.A.len());
|
||||
|
||||
// compute cross terms
|
||||
let T_123 = NIFS::<G1Affine>::comp_T(&relaxed_r1cs_12, &relaxed_r1cs_3, &fw_12.W, &fw3.W);
|
||||
// let rT_123: Fr = Fr::rand(&mut rng);
|
||||
let rT_123: Fr = rT_12.clone(); // TMP TODO
|
||||
let T_123 = NIFS::<G1Affine>::comp_T(&r1cs, phi_12.u, Fr::one(), &fw_12.W, &fw3.W);
|
||||
let rT_123: Fr = Fr::rand(&mut rng);
|
||||
let cmT_123 = Pedersen::commit(&pedersen_params, &T_123, &rT_123);
|
||||
|
||||
// V sets rand challenge r
|
||||
// let r = Fr::rand(&mut rng); // this would come from the transcript
|
||||
let r = Fr::rand(&mut rng); // this would come from the transcript
|
||||
|
||||
// fold witness
|
||||
let fw_123 = NIFS::<G1Affine>::fold_witness(r, &fw_12, &fw3, T_123, rT_123);
|
||||
let fw_123 = NIFS::<G1Affine>::fold_witness(r, &fw_12, &fw3, &T_123, rT_123);
|
||||
|
||||
// get committed instances
|
||||
// phi_12 is already known for Verifier from folding phi1, phi2
|
||||
@@ -341,12 +406,17 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
let phi3 = fw3.commit(&pedersen_params);
|
||||
|
||||
// fold instance
|
||||
let phi_123 = NIFS::<G1Affine>::fold_instance(r, phi_12, phi3, cmT_123);
|
||||
let phi_123 = NIFS::<G1Affine>::fold_instance(r, &phi_12, &phi3, &cmT_123);
|
||||
|
||||
// NIFS.Verify:
|
||||
assert!(NIFS::<G1Affine>::verify(
|
||||
r, &phi_12, &phi3, &phi_123, &cmT_123
|
||||
));
|
||||
|
||||
// naive check that the folded witness satisfies the relaxed r1cs
|
||||
let Az = matrix_vector_product(&relaxed_r1cs_3.ABC.A, &fw_123.W);
|
||||
let Bz = matrix_vector_product(&relaxed_r1cs_3.ABC.B, &fw_123.W);
|
||||
let Cz = matrix_vector_product(&relaxed_r1cs_3.ABC.C, &fw_123.W);
|
||||
let Az = matrix_vector_product(&r1cs.A, &fw_123.W);
|
||||
let Bz = matrix_vector_product(&r1cs.B, &fw_123.W);
|
||||
let Cz = matrix_vector_product(&r1cs.C, &fw_123.W);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
hadamard_product(Az, Bz),
|
||||
vec_add(&vector_elem_product(&Cz, &phi_123.u), &fw_123.E)
|
||||
@@ -363,33 +433,54 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
// init Verifier's transcript
|
||||
let mut transcript_v: Transcript<Fr> = Transcript::<Fr>::new();
|
||||
|
||||
// check openings of phi_123.cmE and phi_123.cmW
|
||||
let phi_123_cmE_proof = Pedersen::prove(
|
||||
&pedersen_params,
|
||||
// check openings of phi_123.cmE, phi_123.cmW and cmT_123
|
||||
let (cmE_proof, cmW_proof, cmT_proof) = NIFS::<G1Affine>::open_commitments(
|
||||
&mut transcript_p,
|
||||
&phi_123.cmE,
|
||||
fw_123.E,
|
||||
fw_123.rE,
|
||||
);
|
||||
let v = Pedersen::verify(
|
||||
&pedersen_params,
|
||||
&mut transcript_v,
|
||||
phi_123.cmE,
|
||||
phi_123_cmE_proof,
|
||||
&fw_123,
|
||||
&phi_123,
|
||||
T_123,
|
||||
rT_123,
|
||||
&cmT_123,
|
||||
);
|
||||
let v = NIFS::<G1Affine>::verify_commitments(
|
||||
&mut transcript_v,
|
||||
&pedersen_params,
|
||||
phi_123,
|
||||
cmT_123,
|
||||
cmE_proof,
|
||||
cmW_proof,
|
||||
cmT_proof,
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(v);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let phi_123_cmW_proof = Pedersen::prove(
|
||||
&pedersen_params,
|
||||
&mut transcript_p,
|
||||
&phi_123.cmW,
|
||||
fw_123.W,
|
||||
fw_123.rW,
|
||||
);
|
||||
let v = Pedersen::verify(
|
||||
&pedersen_params,
|
||||
&mut transcript_v,
|
||||
phi_123.cmW,
|
||||
phi_123_cmW_proof,
|
||||
);
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_nifs_interface() {
|
||||
let mut rng = ark_std::test_rng();
|
||||
let pedersen_params = Pedersen::<G1Affine>::new_params(&mut rng, 100); // 100 is wip, will get it from actual vec
|
||||
|
||||
let (r1cs, w1, w2, _, x1, x2, _) = gen_test_values(&mut rng);
|
||||
let (A, B, C) = (r1cs.A.clone(), r1cs.B.clone(), r1cs.C.clone());
|
||||
|
||||
let r = Fr::rand(&mut rng); // this would come from the transcript
|
||||
|
||||
let fw1 = FWit::<G1Affine>::new(w1.clone(), A.len());
|
||||
let fw2 = FWit::<G1Affine>::new(w2.clone(), A.len());
|
||||
|
||||
// init Prover's transcript
|
||||
let mut transcript_p: Transcript<Fr> = Transcript::<Fr>::new();
|
||||
|
||||
// NIFS.P
|
||||
let (fw3, phi1, phi2, T, cmT) =
|
||||
NIFS::<G1Affine>::P(&mut transcript_p, &pedersen_params, r, &r1cs, fw1, fw2);
|
||||
|
||||
// init Verifier's transcript
|
||||
let mut transcript_v: Transcript<Fr> = Transcript::<Fr>::new();
|
||||
|
||||
// NIFS.V
|
||||
let phi3 = NIFS::<G1Affine>::V(r, &phi1, &phi2, &cmT);
|
||||
|
||||
assert!(NIFS::<G1Affine>::verify(r, &phi1, &phi2, &phi3, &cmT));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ impl<C: AffineRepr> Pedersen<C> {
|
||||
params: &Params<C>,
|
||||
transcript: &mut Transcript<C::ScalarField>,
|
||||
cm: &Commitment<C>, // TODO maybe it makes sense to not have a type wrapper and use directly C
|
||||
v: Vec<C::ScalarField>,
|
||||
r: C::ScalarField,
|
||||
v: &Vec<C::ScalarField>,
|
||||
r: &C::ScalarField,
|
||||
) -> Proof<C> {
|
||||
let r1 = transcript.get_challenge(b"r_1");
|
||||
let d = transcript.get_challenge_vec(b"d", v.len());
|
||||
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
let v: Vec<Fr> = vec![Fr::rand(&mut rng); n];
|
||||
let r: Fr = Fr::rand(&mut rng);
|
||||
let cm = Pedersen::commit(¶ms, &v, &r);
|
||||
let proof = Pedersen::prove(¶ms, &mut transcript_p, &cm, v, r);
|
||||
let proof = Pedersen::prove(¶ms, &mut transcript_p, &cm, &v, &r);
|
||||
let v = Pedersen::verify(¶ms, &mut transcript_v, cm, proof);
|
||||
assert!(v);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user