* Add KZG commitment scheme adapted to vector commitment Add KZG commitment scheme adapted to vector commitment Also move the `src/pedersen.rs` into `src/commitment/pedersen.rs` where it will coexist with `kzg.rs` and the trait defined in `src/commitment/mod.rs`. * Adapt Pedersen into the new CommitmentProver trait * add CommitmentProver (Pedersen&KZG) homomorphic property test * polishing * Use divide_with_q_and_r, rename skip_first_zero_coeffs Co-authored-by: han0110 <tinghan0110@gmail.com> --------- Co-authored-by: han0110 <tinghan0110@gmail.com>main
@ -0,0 +1,234 @@ |
|||
/// Adaptation of the prover methods and structs from arkworks/poly-commit's KZG10 implementation
|
|||
/// into the CommitmentProver trait.
|
|||
///
|
|||
/// The motivation to do so, is that we want to be able to use KZG / Pedersen for committing to
|
|||
/// vectors indistinctly, and the arkworks KZG10 implementation contains all the methods under the
|
|||
/// same trait, which requires the Pairing trait, where the prover does not need access to the
|
|||
/// Pairing but only to G1.
|
|||
/// For our case, we want the folding schemes prover to be agnostic to pairings, since in the
|
|||
/// non-ethereum cases we may use non-pairing-friendly curves with Pedersen commitments, so the
|
|||
/// trait & types that we use should not depend on the Pairing type for the prover. Therefore, we
|
|||
/// separate the CommitmentSchemeProver from the setup and verify phases, so the prover can be
|
|||
/// defined without depending on pairings.
|
|||
use ark_ec::{pairing::Pairing, CurveGroup, VariableBaseMSM};
|
|||
use ark_ff::PrimeField;
|
|||
use ark_poly::{
|
|||
univariate::{DenseOrSparsePolynomial, DensePolynomial},
|
|||
DenseUVPolynomial, EvaluationDomain, Evaluations, GeneralEvaluationDomain, Polynomial,
|
|||
};
|
|||
use ark_poly_commit::kzg10::{VerifierKey, KZG10};
|
|||
use ark_std::rand::Rng;
|
|||
use ark_std::{borrow::Cow, fmt::Debug};
|
|||
use ark_std::{One, Zero};
|
|||
use core::marker::PhantomData;
|
|||
use rayon::iter::{IntoParallelRefIterator, ParallelIterator};
|
|||
|
|||
use super::CommitmentProver;
|
|||
use crate::transcript::Transcript;
|
|||
use crate::Error;
|
|||
|
|||
/// ProverKey defines a similar struct as in ark_poly_commit::kzg10::Powers, but instead of
|
|||
/// depending on the Pairing trait it depends on the CurveGroup trait.
|
|||
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Default, Eq, PartialEq)]
|
|||
pub struct ProverKey<'a, C: CurveGroup> {
|
|||
/// Group elements of the form `β^i G`, for different values of `i`.
|
|||
pub powers_of_g: Cow<'a, [C::Affine]>,
|
|||
}
|
|||
|
|||
pub struct KZGSetup<P: Pairing> {
|
|||
_p: PhantomData<P>,
|
|||
}
|
|||
impl<'a, P> KZGSetup<P>
|
|||
where
|
|||
P: Pairing,
|
|||
{
|
|||
/// setup returns the tuple (ProverKey, VerifierKey). For real world deployments the setup must
|
|||
/// be computed in the most trustless way possible, usually through a MPC ceremony.
|
|||
pub fn setup<R: Rng>(rng: &mut R, len: usize) -> (ProverKey<'a, P::G1>, VerifierKey<P>) {
|
|||
let len = len.next_power_of_two();
|
|||
let universal_params = KZG10::<P, DensePolynomial<P::ScalarField>>::setup(len, false, rng)
|
|||
.expect("Setup failed");
|
|||
let powers_of_g = universal_params.powers_of_g[..=len].to_vec();
|
|||
let powers = ProverKey::<P::G1> {
|
|||
powers_of_g: ark_std::borrow::Cow::Owned(powers_of_g),
|
|||
};
|
|||
let vk = VerifierKey {
|
|||
g: universal_params.powers_of_g[0],
|
|||
gamma_g: universal_params.powers_of_gamma_g[&0],
|
|||
h: universal_params.h,
|
|||
beta_h: universal_params.beta_h,
|
|||
prepared_h: universal_params.prepared_h.clone(),
|
|||
prepared_beta_h: universal_params.prepared_beta_h.clone(),
|
|||
};
|
|||
(powers, vk)
|
|||
}
|
|||
}
|
|||
|
|||
/// KZGProver implements the CommitmentProver trait for the KZG commitment scheme.
|
|||
pub struct KZGProver<'a, C: CurveGroup> {
|
|||
_a: PhantomData<&'a ()>,
|
|||
_c: PhantomData<C>,
|
|||
}
|
|||
impl<'a, C> CommitmentProver<C> for KZGProver<'a, C>
|
|||
where
|
|||
C: CurveGroup,
|
|||
{
|
|||
type Params = ProverKey<'a, C>;
|
|||
/// Proof is a tuple containing (evaluation, proof)
|
|||
type Proof = (C::ScalarField, C);
|
|||
|
|||
/// commit implements the CommitmentProver commit interface, adapting the implementation from
|
|||
/// https://github.com/arkworks-rs/poly-commit/tree/c724fa666e935bbba8db5a1421603bab542e15ab/poly-commit/src/kzg10/mod.rs#L178
|
|||
/// with the main difference being the removal of the blinding factors and the no-dependancy to
|
|||
/// the Pairing trait.
|
|||
fn commit(
|
|||
params: &Self::Params,
|
|||
v: &[C::ScalarField],
|
|||
_blind: &C::ScalarField,
|
|||
) -> Result<C, Error> {
|
|||
if !_blind.is_zero() {
|
|||
return Err(Error::NotSupportedYet("blinding factors".to_string()));
|
|||
}
|
|||
|
|||
let polynomial = poly_from_vec(v.to_vec())?;
|
|||
check_degree_is_too_large(polynomial.degree(), params.powers_of_g.len())?;
|
|||
|
|||
let (num_leading_zeros, plain_coeffs) =
|
|||
skip_first_zero_coeffs_and_convert_to_bigints(&polynomial);
|
|||
let commitment = <C as VariableBaseMSM>::msm_bigint(
|
|||
¶ms.powers_of_g[num_leading_zeros..],
|
|||
&plain_coeffs,
|
|||
);
|
|||
Ok(commitment)
|
|||
}
|
|||
|
|||
/// prove implements the CommitmentProver prove interface, adapting the implementation from
|
|||
/// https://github.com/arkworks-rs/poly-commit/tree/c724fa666e935bbba8db5a1421603bab542e15ab/poly-commit/src/kzg10/mod.rs#L307
|
|||
/// with the main difference being the removal of the blinding factors and the no-dependancy to
|
|||
/// the Pairing trait.
|
|||
fn prove(
|
|||
params: &Self::Params,
|
|||
transcript: &mut impl Transcript<C>,
|
|||
cm: &C,
|
|||
v: &[C::ScalarField],
|
|||
_blind: &C::ScalarField,
|
|||
) -> Result<Self::Proof, Error> {
|
|||
if !_blind.is_zero() {
|
|||
return Err(Error::NotSupportedYet("blinding factors".to_string()));
|
|||
}
|
|||
|
|||
let polynomial = poly_from_vec(v.to_vec())?;
|
|||
check_degree_is_too_large(polynomial.degree(), params.powers_of_g.len())?;
|
|||
|
|||
transcript.absorb_point(cm)?;
|
|||
let challenge = transcript.get_challenge();
|
|||
|
|||
// Compute q(x) = (p(x) - p(z)) / (x-z). Observe that this quotient does not change with z
|
|||
// because p(z) is the remainder term. We can therefore omit p(z) when computing the
|
|||
// quotient.
|
|||
let divisor = DensePolynomial::<C::ScalarField>::from_coefficients_vec(vec![
|
|||
-challenge,
|
|||
C::ScalarField::one(),
|
|||
]);
|
|||
let (witness_poly, remainder_poly) = DenseOrSparsePolynomial::from(&polynomial)
|
|||
.divide_with_q_and_r(&DenseOrSparsePolynomial::from(&divisor))
|
|||
// the panic inside `divide_with_q_and_r` should never be reached, since the divisor
|
|||
// polynomial is constructed right before and is set to not be zero. And the `.unwrap`
|
|||
// should not give an error.
|
|||
.unwrap();
|
|||
let evaluation = remainder_poly[0];
|
|||
|
|||
check_degree_is_too_large(witness_poly.degree(), params.powers_of_g.len())?;
|
|||
let (num_leading_zeros, witness_coeffs) =
|
|||
skip_first_zero_coeffs_and_convert_to_bigints(&witness_poly);
|
|||
let proof = <C as VariableBaseMSM>::msm_bigint(
|
|||
¶ms.powers_of_g[num_leading_zeros..],
|
|||
&witness_coeffs,
|
|||
);
|
|||
|
|||
Ok((evaluation, proof))
|
|||
}
|
|||
}
|
|||
|
|||
/// returns the interpolated polynomial of degree=v.len().next_power_of_two(), which passes through all
|
|||
/// the given elements of v.
|
|||
fn poly_from_vec<F: PrimeField>(v: Vec<F>) -> Result<DensePolynomial<F>, Error> {
|
|||
let D = GeneralEvaluationDomain::<F>::new(v.len()).ok_or(Error::NewDomainFail)?;
|
|||
Ok(Evaluations::from_vec_and_domain(v, D).interpolate())
|
|||
}
|
|||
|
|||
fn check_degree_is_too_large(
|
|||
degree: usize,
|
|||
num_powers: usize,
|
|||
) -> Result<(), ark_poly_commit::error::Error> {
|
|||
let num_coefficients = degree + 1;
|
|||
if num_coefficients > num_powers {
|
|||
Err(ark_poly_commit::error::Error::TooManyCoefficients {
|
|||
num_coefficients,
|
|||
num_powers,
|
|||
})
|
|||
} else {
|
|||
Ok(())
|
|||
}
|
|||
}
|
|||
|
|||
fn skip_first_zero_coeffs_and_convert_to_bigints<F: PrimeField, P: DenseUVPolynomial<F>>(
|
|||
p: &P,
|
|||
) -> (usize, Vec<F::BigInt>) {
|
|||
let mut num_leading_zeros = 0;
|
|||
while num_leading_zeros < p.coeffs().len() && p.coeffs()[num_leading_zeros].is_zero() {
|
|||
num_leading_zeros += 1;
|
|||
}
|
|||
let coeffs = convert_to_bigints(&p.coeffs()[num_leading_zeros..]);
|
|||
(num_leading_zeros, coeffs)
|
|||
}
|
|||
|
|||
fn convert_to_bigints<F: PrimeField>(p: &[F]) -> Vec<F::BigInt> {
|
|||
ark_std::cfg_iter!(p)
|
|||
.map(|s| s.into_bigint())
|
|||
.collect::<Vec<_>>()
|
|||
}
|
|||
|
|||
#[cfg(test)]
|
|||
mod tests {
|
|||
use ark_bn254::{Bn254, Fr, G1Projective as G1};
|
|||
use ark_poly_commit::kzg10::{Commitment as KZG10Commitment, Proof as KZG10Proof, KZG10};
|
|||
use ark_std::{test_rng, UniformRand};
|
|||
|
|||
use super::*;
|
|||
use crate::transcript::poseidon::{tests::poseidon_test_config, PoseidonTranscript};
|
|||
|
|||
#[test]
|
|||
fn test_kzg_commitment_scheme() {
|
|||
let rng = &mut test_rng();
|
|||
let poseidon_config = poseidon_test_config::<Fr>();
|
|||
let transcript_p = &mut PoseidonTranscript::<G1>::new(&poseidon_config);
|
|||
let transcript_v = &mut PoseidonTranscript::<G1>::new(&poseidon_config);
|
|||
|
|||
let n = 10;
|
|||
let (pk, vk): (ProverKey<G1>, VerifierKey<Bn254>) = KZGSetup::<Bn254>::setup(rng, n);
|
|||
|
|||
let v: Vec<Fr> = std::iter::repeat_with(|| Fr::rand(rng)).take(n).collect();
|
|||
let cm = KZGProver::<G1>::commit(&pk, &v, &Fr::zero()).unwrap();
|
|||
|
|||
let (eval, proof) =
|
|||
KZGProver::<G1>::prove(&pk, transcript_p, &cm, &v, &Fr::zero()).unwrap();
|
|||
|
|||
// verify the proof:
|
|||
// get evaluation challenge
|
|||
transcript_v.absorb_point(&cm).unwrap();
|
|||
let challenge = transcript_v.get_challenge();
|
|||
// verify the KZG proof using arkworks method
|
|||
assert!(KZG10::<Bn254, DensePolynomial<Fr>>::check(
|
|||
&vk,
|
|||
&KZG10Commitment(cm.into_affine()),
|
|||
challenge,
|
|||
eval,
|
|||
&KZG10Proof::<Bn254> {
|
|||
w: proof.into_affine(),
|
|||
random_v: None,
|
|||
},
|
|||
)
|
|||
.unwrap());
|
|||
}
|
|||
}
|
@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ |
|||
use ark_ec::CurveGroup;
|
|||
use ark_std::fmt::Debug;
|
|||
|
|||
use crate::transcript::Transcript;
|
|||
use crate::Error;
|
|||
|
|||
pub mod kzg;
|
|||
pub mod pedersen;
|
|||
|
|||
/// CommitmentProver defines the vector commitment scheme prover trait.
|
|||
pub trait CommitmentProver<C: CurveGroup> {
|
|||
type Params: Debug;
|
|||
type Proof: Debug;
|
|||
|
|||
fn commit(
|
|||
params: &Self::Params,
|
|||
v: &[C::ScalarField],
|
|||
blind: &C::ScalarField,
|
|||
) -> Result<C, Error>;
|
|||
fn prove(
|
|||
params: &Self::Params,
|
|||
transcript: &mut impl Transcript<C>,
|
|||
cm: &C,
|
|||
v: &[C::ScalarField],
|
|||
blind: &C::ScalarField,
|
|||
) -> Result<Self::Proof, Error>;
|
|||
}
|
|||
|
|||
#[cfg(test)]
|
|||
mod tests {
|
|||
use super::*;
|
|||
use ark_bn254::{Bn254, Fr, G1Projective as G1};
|
|||
use ark_crypto_primitives::sponge::{poseidon::PoseidonConfig, Absorb};
|
|||
use ark_poly::univariate::DensePolynomial;
|
|||
use ark_poly_commit::kzg10::{
|
|||
Commitment as KZG10Commitment, Proof as KZG10Proof, VerifierKey, KZG10,
|
|||
};
|
|||
use ark_std::Zero;
|
|||
use ark_std::{test_rng, UniformRand};
|
|||
|
|||
use super::kzg::{KZGProver, KZGSetup, ProverKey};
|
|||
use super::pedersen::Pedersen;
|
|||
use crate::transcript::{
|
|||
poseidon::{tests::poseidon_test_config, PoseidonTranscript},
|
|||
Transcript,
|
|||
};
|
|||
|
|||
// Computes the commitment of the two vectors using the given CommitmentProver, then computes
|
|||
// their random linear combination, and returns it together with the proof of it.
|
|||
fn commit_rlc_and_prove<C: CurveGroup, CP: CommitmentProver<C>>(
|
|||
poseidon_config: &PoseidonConfig<C::ScalarField>,
|
|||
params: &CP::Params,
|
|||
r: C::ScalarField,
|
|||
v_1: &[C::ScalarField],
|
|||
v_2: &[C::ScalarField],
|
|||
) -> Result<(C, CP::Proof), Error>
|
|||
where
|
|||
<C as ark_ec::Group>::ScalarField: Absorb,
|
|||
{
|
|||
let cm_1 = CP::commit(params, v_1, &C::ScalarField::zero())?;
|
|||
let cm_2 = CP::commit(params, v_2, &C::ScalarField::zero())?;
|
|||
|
|||
// random linear combination of the commitment and the witness (vector v)
|
|||
let cm_3 = cm_1 + cm_2.mul(r);
|
|||
let v_3: Vec<C::ScalarField> = v_1.iter().zip(v_2).map(|(a, b)| *a + (r * b)).collect();
|
|||
|
|||
let transcript = &mut PoseidonTranscript::<C>::new(poseidon_config);
|
|||
let proof = CP::prove(params, transcript, &cm_3, &v_3, &C::ScalarField::zero()).unwrap();
|
|||
|
|||
Ok((cm_3, proof))
|
|||
}
|
|||
|
|||
#[test]
|
|||
fn test_homomorphic_property_using_CommitmentProver_trait() {
|
|||
let rng = &mut test_rng();
|
|||
let poseidon_config = poseidon_test_config::<Fr>();
|
|||
let n: usize = 100;
|
|||
|
|||
// set random vector for the test
|
|||
let v_1: Vec<Fr> = std::iter::repeat_with(|| Fr::rand(rng)).take(n).collect();
|
|||
let v_2: Vec<Fr> = std::iter::repeat_with(|| Fr::rand(rng)).take(n).collect();
|
|||
// set a random challenge for the random linear combination
|
|||
let r = Fr::rand(rng);
|
|||
|
|||
// setup params for Pedersen & KZG
|
|||
let pedersen_params = Pedersen::<G1>::new_params(rng, n);
|
|||
let (kzg_pk, kzg_vk): (ProverKey<G1>, VerifierKey<Bn254>) =
|
|||
KZGSetup::<Bn254>::setup(rng, n);
|
|||
|
|||
// Pedersen commit the two vectors and return their random linear combination and proof
|
|||
let (pedersen_cm, pedersen_proof) = commit_rlc_and_prove::<G1, Pedersen<G1>>(
|
|||
&poseidon_config,
|
|||
&pedersen_params,
|
|||
r,
|
|||
&v_1,
|
|||
&v_2,
|
|||
)
|
|||
.unwrap();
|
|||
|
|||
// KZG commit the two vectors and return their random linear combination and proof
|
|||
let (kzg_cm, kzg_proof) =
|
|||
commit_rlc_and_prove::<G1, KZGProver<G1>>(&poseidon_config, &kzg_pk, r, &v_1, &v_2)
|
|||
.unwrap();
|
|||
|
|||
// verify Pedersen
|
|||
let transcript_v = &mut PoseidonTranscript::<G1>::new(&poseidon_config);
|
|||
Pedersen::<G1>::verify(&pedersen_params, transcript_v, pedersen_cm, pedersen_proof)
|
|||
.unwrap();
|
|||
|
|||
// verify KZG
|
|||
let transcript_v = &mut PoseidonTranscript::<G1>::new(&poseidon_config);
|
|||
transcript_v.absorb_point(&kzg_cm).unwrap();
|
|||
let challenge = transcript_v.get_challenge();
|
|||
// verify the KZG proof using arkworks method
|
|||
assert!(KZG10::<Bn254, DensePolynomial<Fr>>::check(
|
|||
&kzg_vk,
|
|||
&KZG10Commitment(kzg_cm.into_affine()),
|
|||
challenge,
|
|||
kzg_proof.0, // eval
|
|||
&KZG10Proof::<Bn254> {
|
|||
w: kzg_proof.1.into_affine(), // proof
|
|||
random_v: None,
|
|||
},
|
|||
)
|
|||
.unwrap());
|
|||
}
|
|||
}
|