|
|
@ -1,12 +1,15 @@ |
|
|
|
#![allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
|
|
|
|
use crate::group::CompressedGroup;
|
|
|
|
use crate::sumcheck::SumcheckInstanceProof;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use super::commitments::{Commitments, MultiCommitGens};
|
|
|
|
use super::dense_mlpoly::{
|
|
|
|
DensePolynomial, EqPolynomial, PolyCommitment, PolyCommitmentGens, PolyEvalProof,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
use super::errors::ProofVerifyError;
|
|
|
|
use super::group::{GroupElement, VartimeMultiscalarMul, CompressGroupElement, DecompressGroupElement};
|
|
|
|
use super::group::{
|
|
|
|
CompressGroupElement, DecompressGroupElement, GroupElement, VartimeMultiscalarMul,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
use super::nizk::{EqualityProof, KnowledgeProof, ProductProof};
|
|
|
|
use super::r1csinstance::R1CSInstance;
|
|
|
|
use super::random::RandomTape;
|
|
|
@ -15,29 +18,23 @@ use super::sparse_mlpoly::{SparsePolyEntry, SparsePolynomial}; |
|
|
|
use super::sumcheck::ZKSumcheckInstanceProof;
|
|
|
|
use super::timer::Timer;
|
|
|
|
use super::transcript::{AppendToTranscript, ProofTranscript};
|
|
|
|
use core::iter;
|
|
|
|
use ark_ec::ProjectiveCurve;
|
|
|
|
use ark_ff::PrimeField;
|
|
|
|
use merlin::Transcript;
|
|
|
|
use ark_serialize::*;
|
|
|
|
use ark_std::{Zero, One};
|
|
|
|
use ark_ec::{ProjectiveCurve};
|
|
|
|
use ark_std::{One, Zero};
|
|
|
|
use core::iter;
|
|
|
|
use merlin::Transcript;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[derive(CanonicalSerialize, CanonicalDeserialize, Debug)]
|
|
|
|
pub struct R1CSProof {
|
|
|
|
comm_vars: PolyCommitment,
|
|
|
|
sc_proof_phase1: ZKSumcheckInstanceProof,
|
|
|
|
claims_phase2: (
|
|
|
|
CompressedGroup,
|
|
|
|
CompressedGroup,
|
|
|
|
CompressedGroup,
|
|
|
|
CompressedGroup,
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
pok_claims_phase2: (KnowledgeProof, ProductProof),
|
|
|
|
proof_eq_sc_phase1: EqualityProof,
|
|
|
|
sc_proof_phase2: ZKSumcheckInstanceProof,
|
|
|
|
comm_vars_at_ry: CompressedGroup,
|
|
|
|
proof_eval_vars_at_ry: PolyEvalProof,
|
|
|
|
proof_eq_sc_phase2: EqualityProof,
|
|
|
|
sc_proof_phase1: SumcheckInstanceProof,
|
|
|
|
claims_phase2: (Scalar, Scalar, Scalar, Scalar),
|
|
|
|
// pok_claims_phase2: (KnowledgeProof, ProductProof),
|
|
|
|
// proof_eq_sc_phase1: EqualityProof,
|
|
|
|
sc_proof_phase2: SumcheckInstanceProof,
|
|
|
|
eval_vars_at_ry: Scalar,
|
|
|
|
// proof_eval_vars_at_ry: PolyEvalProof,
|
|
|
|
// proof_eq_sc_phase2: EqualityProof,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pub struct R1CSSumcheckGens {
|
|
|
@ -82,61 +79,43 @@ impl R1CSProof { |
|
|
|
evals_Az: &mut DensePolynomial,
|
|
|
|
evals_Bz: &mut DensePolynomial,
|
|
|
|
evals_Cz: &mut DensePolynomial,
|
|
|
|
gens: &R1CSSumcheckGens,
|
|
|
|
transcript: &mut Transcript,
|
|
|
|
random_tape: &mut RandomTape,
|
|
|
|
) -> (ZKSumcheckInstanceProof, Vec<Scalar>, Vec<Scalar>, Scalar) {
|
|
|
|
let comb_func = |poly_A_comp: &Scalar,
|
|
|
|
poly_B_comp: &Scalar,
|
|
|
|
poly_C_comp: &Scalar,
|
|
|
|
poly_D_comp: &Scalar|
|
|
|
|
-> Scalar { (*poly_A_comp) * ((*poly_B_comp) * poly_C_comp - poly_D_comp) };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let (sc_proof_phase_one, r, claims, blind_claim_postsc) =
|
|
|
|
ZKSumcheckInstanceProof::prove_cubic_with_additive_term(
|
|
|
|
&Scalar::zero(), // claim is zero
|
|
|
|
&Scalar::zero(), // blind for claim is also zero
|
|
|
|
num_rounds,
|
|
|
|
evals_tau,
|
|
|
|
evals_Az,
|
|
|
|
evals_Bz,
|
|
|
|
evals_Cz,
|
|
|
|
comb_func,
|
|
|
|
&gens.gens_1,
|
|
|
|
&gens.gens_4,
|
|
|
|
transcript,
|
|
|
|
random_tape,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
) -> (SumcheckInstanceProof, Vec<Scalar>, Vec<Scalar>) {
|
|
|
|
let comb_func =
|
|
|
|
|poly_tau_comp: &Scalar,
|
|
|
|
poly_A_comp: &Scalar,
|
|
|
|
poly_B_comp: &Scalar,
|
|
|
|
poly_C_comp: &Scalar|
|
|
|
|
-> Scalar { (*poly_tau_comp) * ((*poly_A_comp) * poly_B_comp - poly_C_comp) };
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let (sc_proof_phase_one, r, claims) = SumcheckInstanceProof::prove_cubic_with_additive_term(
|
|
|
|
&Scalar::zero(), // claim is zero
|
|
|
|
num_rounds,
|
|
|
|
evals_tau,
|
|
|
|
evals_Az,
|
|
|
|
evals_Bz,
|
|
|
|
evals_Cz,
|
|
|
|
comb_func,
|
|
|
|
transcript,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(sc_proof_phase_one, r, claims, blind_claim_postsc)
|
|
|
|
(sc_proof_phase_one, r, claims)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn prove_phase_two(
|
|
|
|
num_rounds: usize,
|
|
|
|
claim: &Scalar,
|
|
|
|
blind_claim: &Scalar,
|
|
|
|
evals_z: &mut DensePolynomial,
|
|
|
|
evals_ABC: &mut DensePolynomial,
|
|
|
|
gens: &R1CSSumcheckGens,
|
|
|
|
transcript: &mut Transcript,
|
|
|
|
random_tape: &mut RandomTape,
|
|
|
|
) -> (ZKSumcheckInstanceProof, Vec<Scalar>, Vec<Scalar>, Scalar) {
|
|
|
|
) -> (SumcheckInstanceProof, Vec<Scalar>, Vec<Scalar>) {
|
|
|
|
let comb_func =
|
|
|
|
|poly_A_comp: &Scalar, poly_B_comp: &Scalar| -> Scalar { (*poly_A_comp) * poly_B_comp };
|
|
|
|
let (sc_proof_phase_two, r, claims, blind_claim_postsc) = ZKSumcheckInstanceProof::prove_quad(
|
|
|
|
claim,
|
|
|
|
blind_claim,
|
|
|
|
num_rounds,
|
|
|
|
evals_z,
|
|
|
|
evals_ABC,
|
|
|
|
comb_func,
|
|
|
|
&gens.gens_1,
|
|
|
|
&gens.gens_3,
|
|
|
|
transcript,
|
|
|
|
random_tape,
|
|
|
|
let (sc_proof_phase_two, r, claims) = SumcheckInstanceProof::prove_quad(
|
|
|
|
claim, num_rounds, evals_z, evals_ABC, comb_func, transcript,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(sc_proof_phase_two, r, claims, blind_claim_postsc)
|
|
|
|
(sc_proof_phase_two, r, claims)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn protocol_name() -> &'static [u8] {
|
|
|
@ -159,19 +138,7 @@ impl R1CSProof { |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
input.append_to_transcript(b"input", transcript);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let timer_commit = Timer::new("polycommit");
|
|
|
|
let (poly_vars, comm_vars, blinds_vars) = {
|
|
|
|
// create a multilinear polynomial using the supplied assignment for variables
|
|
|
|
let poly_vars = DensePolynomial::new(vars.clone());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// produce a commitment to the satisfying assignment
|
|
|
|
let (comm_vars, blinds_vars) = poly_vars.commit(&gens.gens_pc, Some(random_tape));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// add the commitment to the prover's transcript
|
|
|
|
comm_vars.append_to_transcript(b"poly_commitment", transcript);
|
|
|
|
(poly_vars, comm_vars, blinds_vars)
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
timer_commit.stop();
|
|
|
|
let poly_vars = DensePolynomial::new(vars.clone());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let timer_sc_proof_phase1 = Timer::new("prove_sc_phase_one");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -195,15 +162,13 @@ impl R1CSProof { |
|
|
|
let (mut poly_Az, mut poly_Bz, mut poly_Cz) =
|
|
|
|
inst.multiply_vec(inst.get_num_cons(), z.len(), &z);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let (sc_proof_phase1, rx, _claims_phase1, blind_claim_postsc1) = R1CSProof::prove_phase_one(
|
|
|
|
let (sc_proof_phase1, rx, _claims_phase1) = R1CSProof::prove_phase_one(
|
|
|
|
num_rounds_x,
|
|
|
|
&mut poly_tau,
|
|
|
|
&mut poly_Az,
|
|
|
|
&mut poly_Bz,
|
|
|
|
&mut poly_Cz,
|
|
|
|
&gens.gens_sc,
|
|
|
|
transcript,
|
|
|
|
random_tape,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(poly_tau.len(), 1);
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(poly_Az.len(), 1);
|
|
|
@ -213,56 +178,11 @@ impl R1CSProof { |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let (tau_claim, Az_claim, Bz_claim, Cz_claim) =
|
|
|
|
(&poly_tau[0], &poly_Az[0], &poly_Bz[0], &poly_Cz[0]);
|
|
|
|
let (Az_blind, Bz_blind, Cz_blind, prod_Az_Bz_blind) = (
|
|
|
|
random_tape.random_scalar(b"Az_blind"),
|
|
|
|
random_tape.random_scalar(b"Bz_blind"),
|
|
|
|
random_tape.random_scalar(b"Cz_blind"),
|
|
|
|
random_tape.random_scalar(b"prod_Az_Bz_blind"),
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let (pok_Cz_claim, comm_Cz_claim) = {
|
|
|
|
KnowledgeProof::prove(
|
|
|
|
&gens.gens_sc.gens_1,
|
|
|
|
transcript,
|
|
|
|
random_tape,
|
|
|
|
Cz_claim,
|
|
|
|
&Cz_blind,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let (proof_prod, comm_Az_claim, comm_Bz_claim, comm_prod_Az_Bz_claims) = {
|
|
|
|
let prod = (*Az_claim) * Bz_claim;
|
|
|
|
ProductProof::prove(
|
|
|
|
&gens.gens_sc.gens_1,
|
|
|
|
transcript,
|
|
|
|
random_tape,
|
|
|
|
Az_claim,
|
|
|
|
&Az_blind,
|
|
|
|
Bz_claim,
|
|
|
|
&Bz_blind,
|
|
|
|
&prod,
|
|
|
|
&prod_Az_Bz_blind,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
comm_Az_claim.append_to_transcript(b"comm_Az_claim", transcript);
|
|
|
|
comm_Bz_claim.append_to_transcript(b"comm_Bz_claim", transcript);
|
|
|
|
comm_Cz_claim.append_to_transcript(b"comm_Cz_claim", transcript);
|
|
|
|
comm_prod_Az_Bz_claims.append_to_transcript(b"comm_prod_Az_Bz_claims", transcript);
|
|
|
|
let prod_Az_Bz_claims = (*Az_claim) * Bz_claim;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// prove the final step of sum-check #1
|
|
|
|
let taus_bound_rx = tau_claim;
|
|
|
|
let blind_expected_claim_postsc1 = (prod_Az_Bz_blind - Cz_blind) * taus_bound_rx;
|
|
|
|
let claim_post_phase1 = ((*Az_claim) * Bz_claim - Cz_claim) * taus_bound_rx;
|
|
|
|
let (proof_eq_sc_phase1, _C1, _C2) = EqualityProof::prove(
|
|
|
|
&gens.gens_sc.gens_1,
|
|
|
|
transcript,
|
|
|
|
random_tape,
|
|
|
|
&claim_post_phase1,
|
|
|
|
&blind_expected_claim_postsc1,
|
|
|
|
&claim_post_phase1,
|
|
|
|
&blind_claim_postsc1,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let timer_sc_proof_phase2 = Timer::new("prove_sc_phase_two");
|
|
|
|
// combine the three claims into a single claim
|
|
|
@ -270,7 +190,6 @@ impl R1CSProof { |
|
|
|
let r_B = transcript.challenge_scalar(b"challenege_Bz");
|
|
|
|
let r_C = transcript.challenge_scalar(b"challenege_Cz");
|
|
|
|
let claim_phase2 = r_A * Az_claim + r_B * Bz_claim + r_C * Cz_claim;
|
|
|
|
let blind_claim_phase2 = r_A * Az_blind + r_B * Bz_blind + r_C * Cz_blind;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let evals_ABC = {
|
|
|
|
// compute the initial evaluation table for R(\tau, x)
|
|
|
@ -286,65 +205,27 @@ impl R1CSProof { |
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// another instance of the sum-check protocol
|
|
|
|
let (sc_proof_phase2, ry, claims_phase2, blind_claim_postsc2) = R1CSProof::prove_phase_two(
|
|
|
|
let (sc_proof_phase2, ry, claims_phase2) = R1CSProof::prove_phase_two(
|
|
|
|
num_rounds_y,
|
|
|
|
&claim_phase2,
|
|
|
|
&blind_claim_phase2,
|
|
|
|
&mut DensePolynomial::new(z),
|
|
|
|
&mut DensePolynomial::new(evals_ABC),
|
|
|
|
&gens.gens_sc,
|
|
|
|
transcript,
|
|
|
|
random_tape,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
timer_sc_proof_phase2.stop();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let timer_polyeval = Timer::new("polyeval");
|
|
|
|
let eval_vars_at_ry = poly_vars.evaluate(&ry[1..].to_vec());
|
|
|
|
let blind_eval = random_tape.random_scalar(b"blind_eval");
|
|
|
|
let (proof_eval_vars_at_ry, comm_vars_at_ry) = PolyEvalProof::prove(
|
|
|
|
&poly_vars,
|
|
|
|
Some(&blinds_vars),
|
|
|
|
&ry[1..].to_vec(),
|
|
|
|
&eval_vars_at_ry,
|
|
|
|
Some(&blind_eval),
|
|
|
|
&gens.gens_pc,
|
|
|
|
transcript,
|
|
|
|
random_tape,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
timer_polyeval.stop();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// prove the final step of sum-check #2
|
|
|
|
let blind_eval_Z_at_ry = (Scalar::one() - ry[0]) * blind_eval;
|
|
|
|
let blind_expected_claim_postsc2 = claims_phase2[1] * blind_eval_Z_at_ry;
|
|
|
|
let claim_post_phase2 = claims_phase2[0] * claims_phase2[1];
|
|
|
|
let (proof_eq_sc_phase2, _C1, _C2) = EqualityProof::prove(
|
|
|
|
&gens.gens_pc.gens.gens_1,
|
|
|
|
transcript,
|
|
|
|
random_tape,
|
|
|
|
&claim_post_phase2,
|
|
|
|
&blind_expected_claim_postsc2,
|
|
|
|
&claim_post_phase2,
|
|
|
|
&blind_claim_postsc2,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
timer_prove.stop();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
|
|
|
R1CSProof {
|
|
|
|
comm_vars,
|
|
|
|
sc_proof_phase1,
|
|
|
|
claims_phase2: (
|
|
|
|
comm_Az_claim,
|
|
|
|
comm_Bz_claim,
|
|
|
|
comm_Cz_claim,
|
|
|
|
comm_prod_Az_Bz_claims,
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
pok_claims_phase2: (pok_Cz_claim, proof_prod),
|
|
|
|
proof_eq_sc_phase1,
|
|
|
|
claims_phase2: (*Az_claim, *Bz_claim, *Cz_claim, prod_Az_Bz_claims),
|
|
|
|
sc_proof_phase2,
|
|
|
|
comm_vars_at_ry,
|
|
|
|
proof_eval_vars_at_ry,
|
|
|
|
proof_eq_sc_phase2,
|
|
|
|
eval_vars_at_ry,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
rx,
|
|
|
|
ry,
|
|
|
@ -365,10 +246,6 @@ impl R1CSProof { |
|
|
|
input.append_to_transcript(b"input", transcript);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let n = num_vars;
|
|
|
|
// add the commitment to the verifier's transcript
|
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
.comm_vars
|
|
|
|
.append_to_transcript(b"poly_commitment", transcript);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let (num_rounds_x, num_rounds_y) = (num_cons.log2() as usize, (2 * num_vars).log2() as usize);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -376,85 +253,35 @@ impl R1CSProof { |
|
|
|
let tau = transcript.challenge_vector(b"challenge_tau", num_rounds_x);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// verify the first sum-check instance
|
|
|
|
let claim_phase1 = Scalar::zero()
|
|
|
|
.commit(&Scalar::zero(), &gens.gens_sc.gens_1)
|
|
|
|
.compress();
|
|
|
|
let (comm_claim_post_phase1, rx) = self.sc_proof_phase1.verify(
|
|
|
|
&claim_phase1,
|
|
|
|
num_rounds_x,
|
|
|
|
3,
|
|
|
|
&gens.gens_sc.gens_1,
|
|
|
|
&gens.gens_sc.gens_4,
|
|
|
|
transcript,
|
|
|
|
)?;
|
|
|
|
// perform the intermediate sum-check test with claimed Az, Bz, and Cz
|
|
|
|
let (comm_Az_claim, comm_Bz_claim, comm_Cz_claim, comm_prod_Az_Bz_claims) = &self.claims_phase2;
|
|
|
|
let (pok_Cz_claim, proof_prod) = &self.pok_claims_phase2;
|
|
|
|
let claim_phase1 = Scalar::zero();
|
|
|
|
let (claim_post_phase1, rx) =
|
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
.sc_proof_phase1
|
|
|
|
.verify(claim_phase1, num_rounds_x, 3, transcript)?;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pok_Cz_claim.verify(&gens.gens_sc.gens_1, transcript, comm_Cz_claim)?;
|
|
|
|
proof_prod.verify(
|
|
|
|
&gens.gens_sc.gens_1,
|
|
|
|
transcript,
|
|
|
|
comm_Az_claim,
|
|
|
|
comm_Bz_claim,
|
|
|
|
comm_prod_Az_Bz_claims,
|
|
|
|
)?;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
comm_Az_claim.append_to_transcript(b"comm_Az_claim", transcript);
|
|
|
|
comm_Bz_claim.append_to_transcript(b"comm_Bz_claim", transcript);
|
|
|
|
comm_Cz_claim.append_to_transcript(b"comm_Cz_claim", transcript);
|
|
|
|
comm_prod_Az_Bz_claims.append_to_transcript(b"comm_prod_Az_Bz_claims", transcript);
|
|
|
|
// perform the intermediate sum-check test with claimed Az, Bz, and Cz
|
|
|
|
let (Az_claim, Bz_claim, Cz_claim, prod_Az_Bz_claims) = &self.claims_phase2;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let taus_bound_rx: Scalar = (0..rx.len())
|
|
|
|
.map(|i| rx[i] * tau[i] + (Scalar::one() - rx[i]) * (Scalar::one() - tau[i]))
|
|
|
|
.product();
|
|
|
|
let expected_claim_post_phase1 = (GroupElement::decompress(comm_prod_Az_Bz_claims).unwrap() - GroupElement::decompress(comm_Cz_claim).unwrap()).mul(taus_bound_rx.into_repr())
|
|
|
|
.compress();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// verify proof that expected_claim_post_phase1 == claim_post_phase1
|
|
|
|
self.proof_eq_sc_phase1.verify(
|
|
|
|
&gens.gens_sc.gens_1,
|
|
|
|
transcript,
|
|
|
|
&expected_claim_post_phase1,
|
|
|
|
&comm_claim_post_phase1,
|
|
|
|
)?;
|
|
|
|
let expected_claim_post_phase1 = (*prod_Az_Bz_claims - *Cz_claim) * (taus_bound_rx);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(claim_post_phase1, expected_claim_post_phase1);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// derive three public challenges and then derive a joint claim
|
|
|
|
let r_A = transcript.challenge_scalar(b"challenege_Az");
|
|
|
|
let r_B = transcript.challenge_scalar(b"challenege_Bz");
|
|
|
|
let r_C = transcript.challenge_scalar(b"challenege_Cz");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// r_A * comm_Az_claim + r_B * comm_Bz_claim + r_C * comm_Cz_claim;
|
|
|
|
let comm_claim_phase2 = GroupElement::vartime_multiscalar_mul(
|
|
|
|
iter::once(&r_A)
|
|
|
|
.chain(iter::once(&r_B))
|
|
|
|
.chain(iter::once(&r_C)).map(|s| (*s)).collect::<Vec<Scalar>>().as_slice(),
|
|
|
|
iter::once(&comm_Az_claim)
|
|
|
|
.chain(iter::once(&comm_Bz_claim))
|
|
|
|
.chain(iter::once(&comm_Cz_claim))
|
|
|
|
.map(|pt| GroupElement::decompress(pt).unwrap())
|
|
|
|
.collect::<Vec<GroupElement>>().as_slice(),
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
.compress();
|
|
|
|
let claim_phase2 = r_A * Az_claim + r_B * Bz_claim + r_C * Cz_claim;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// verify the joint claim with a sum-check protocol
|
|
|
|
let (comm_claim_post_phase2, ry) = self.sc_proof_phase2.verify(
|
|
|
|
&comm_claim_phase2,
|
|
|
|
num_rounds_y,
|
|
|
|
2,
|
|
|
|
&gens.gens_sc.gens_1,
|
|
|
|
&gens.gens_sc.gens_3,
|
|
|
|
transcript,
|
|
|
|
)?;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// verify Z(ry) proof against the initial commitment
|
|
|
|
self.proof_eval_vars_at_ry.verify(
|
|
|
|
&gens.gens_pc,
|
|
|
|
transcript,
|
|
|
|
&ry[1..].to_vec(),
|
|
|
|
&self.comm_vars_at_ry,
|
|
|
|
&self.comm_vars,
|
|
|
|
)?;
|
|
|
|
let (claim_post_phase2, ry) =
|
|
|
|
self
|
|
|
|
.sc_proof_phase2
|
|
|
|
.verify(claim_phase2, num_rounds_y, 2, transcript)?;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let poly_input_eval = {
|
|
|
|
// constant term
|
|
|
@ -469,26 +296,14 @@ impl R1CSProof { |
|
|
|
.evaluate(&ry[1..].to_vec())
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// compute commitment to eval_Z_at_ry = (Scalar::one() - ry[0]) * self.eval_vars_at_ry + ry[0] * poly_input_eval
|
|
|
|
let comm_eval_Z_at_ry = GroupElement::vartime_multiscalar_mul(
|
|
|
|
iter::once(Scalar::one() - ry[0]).chain(iter::once(ry[0])).collect::<Vec<Scalar>>().as_slice(),
|
|
|
|
iter::once(GroupElement::decompress(&self.comm_vars_at_ry).unwrap()).chain(iter::once(
|
|
|
|
poly_input_eval.commit(&Scalar::zero(), &gens.gens_pc.gens.gens_1),
|
|
|
|
)).collect::<Vec<GroupElement>>().as_slice(),
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let eval_Z_at_ry = (Scalar::one() - ry[0]) * self.eval_vars_at_ry + ry[0] * poly_input_eval;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// perform the final check in the second sum-check protocol
|
|
|
|
let (eval_A_r, eval_B_r, eval_C_r) = evals;
|
|
|
|
let scalar = r_A * eval_A_r + r_B * eval_B_r + r_C * eval_C_r;
|
|
|
|
let expected_claim_post_phase2 =
|
|
|
|
comm_eval_Z_at_ry.mul(scalar.into_repr()).compress();
|
|
|
|
// verify proof that expected_claim_post_phase1 == claim_post_phase1
|
|
|
|
self.proof_eq_sc_phase2.verify(
|
|
|
|
&gens.gens_sc.gens_1,
|
|
|
|
transcript,
|
|
|
|
&expected_claim_post_phase2,
|
|
|
|
&comm_claim_post_phase2,
|
|
|
|
)?;
|
|
|
|
let expected_claim_post_phase2 = eval_Z_at_ry * scalar;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(expected_claim_post_phase2, claim_post_phase2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ok((rx, ry))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
@ -497,7 +312,8 @@ impl R1CSProof { |
|
|
|
#[cfg(test)]
|
|
|
|
mod tests {
|
|
|
|
use super::*;
|
|
|
|
use ark_std::{UniformRand};
|
|
|
|
use ark_std::UniformRand;
|
|
|
|
use test::Bencher;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn produce_tiny_r1cs() -> (R1CSInstance, Vec<Scalar>, Vec<Scalar>) {
|
|
|
|
// three constraints over five variables Z1, Z2, Z3, Z4, and Z5
|
|
|
@ -533,7 +349,7 @@ use ark_std::{UniformRand}; |
|
|
|
let inst = R1CSInstance::new(num_cons, num_vars, num_inputs, &A, &B, &C);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// compute a satisfying assignment
|
|
|
|
let mut rng = ark_std::rand::thread_rng();
|
|
|
|
let mut rng = ark_std::rand::thread_rng();
|
|
|
|
let i0 = Scalar::rand(&mut rng);
|
|
|
|
let i1 = Scalar::rand(&mut rng);
|
|
|
|
let z1 = Scalar::rand(&mut rng);
|
|
|
@ -604,4 +420,9 @@ use ark_std::{UniformRand}; |
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
.is_ok());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[bench]
|
|
|
|
fn bench_r1cs_proof(b: &mut Bencher) {
|
|
|
|
b.iter(|| check_r1cs_proof());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|