arnaucube
arnaucube/mathPublic Self-hosted repository
polish Zariski's & Weak Nullstellensatz & Nullstellensatz proofs
arnaucube git@arnaucube.com
Sun, 01 Mar 2026 19:41:58 +0100
commit

78d0c1ca84df1ff729dafdd4b790f77cbf1edcaa

parent

b5b12fc3cf0a9cf6e18574ce681677220ac125af

2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

jump to
M commutative-algebra-notes.tex → commutative-algebra-notes.tex

@@ -1361,7 +1361,24 @@ It's a fingen $k$-algebra, so by Zariski's lemma, $k[X_1, \ldots, X_n]/m$ is algebraic over $k$.

Since $k[X_1, \ldots, X_n]/m$ is algebraically closed, it must equal $k$; ie. $$\frac{k[X_1, \ldots, X_n]}{m}=k$$ -Thus $m=(X_1 - a_1, \ldots, X_n - a_n)$ (shown at \ref{5.2}). + + +Since $k[X_1, \ldots, X_n]$ is a $k$-algebra, we have the natural map +$$\psi: k \longrightarrow \frac{k[X_1, \ldots, X_n]}{m}$$ +so that $\forall x_i \in k,~~\psi(x_i)=a_i \in k$ (its image in the quotient field $k[X_1, \ldots, X_n]/m$ must be an element of $k$).\\ +Then, by definition of a quotient ring, $\psi(x_i)$ is the coset $\psi(x_i)=X_i +m$. +Thus, +$$a_i = X_i +m$$ +$$\Longrightarrow X_i - a_i \in m$$ + + % So, $\forall x_i \in k$, its image in the quotient field $A/m$ must be an element of $k$. + % $$\Longrightarrow x_i'=a_i \in k, ~\forall i \in [n]$$ + % $$\Longrightarrow x_i - a_i \in m$$ + +The ideal generated by these terms is a subset of $m$: +$$J=(X_1 -a_1, \ldots, X_n -a_n) \subseteq m$$ + +Thus $m=(X_1 - a_1, \ldots, X_n - a_n)$ (shown also at \ref{5.2}). \vspace{0.4cm} Then:

@@ -1431,16 +1448,19 @@ let $m \subset k[X_1, \ldots, X_n]$ be a maximal ideal.

By fundamental property of maximal ideals, $K=A/m$ is a field. - Since $A$ is a fingen $k$-algebra (generated by $X_1, \ldots, X_n$), then $K=A/m$ is also a fingen $k$-algebra, generated by residues $x_i' = x_i +m$. + Since $A$ is a fingen $k$-algebra (generated by $X_1, \ldots, X_n$), then $K=A/m$ is also a fingen $k$-algebra, generated by residues $\psi(x_i) = x_i' = x_i +m$ (where $\psi: k \longrightarrow A/m$). By Zariski's lemma (\ref{zariski}), $K=A/m$ is algeraic over $k$. Since by hypothesis $k$ is algebraically closed, it has no proper algebraic extensions\\ \hspace*{2em} $\Longrightarrow~~ K=k~~ \Longrightarrow~~ k \cong A/m$. - So, $\forall x_i \in k$, its image in the quotient field $A/m$ must be an element of $k$. - $$\Longrightarrow x_i'=a_i \in k, ~\forall i \in [n]$$ - $$\Longrightarrow x_i - a_i \in m$$ + \vspace{0.3cm} + Recall that since $A$ is a $k$-algebra, we have the natural map $\psi: k \longrightarrow A/m$, so that $\forall x_i \in k,~~\psi(x_i)=a_i \in k$ (its image in the quotient field $A/m$ must be an element of $k$).\\ + Also, by definition of a quotient ring, $\psi(x_i)$ is the coset $\psi(x_i)=X_i +m$. + Thus, + $$a_i = X_i +m$$ + $$\Longrightarrow X_i - a_i \in m$$ The ideal generated by these terms is a subset of $m$: $$J=(X_1 -a_1, \ldots, X_n -a_n) \subseteq m$$

@@ -1452,12 +1472,15 @@

\vspace{0.3cm} Let \begin{align*} - \psi: k[X_1, \ldots, X_n] &\longrightarrow k[X_1, \ldots, X_n]/m\\ - \psi: x_i &\longmapsto a_i + \phi: k[X_1, \ldots, X_n] &\longrightarrow k[X_1, \ldots, X_n]/m\\ + \phi: x_i &\longmapsto a_i \end{align*} - Since $\psi$ is a $k$-algebra homomorphism, then $\forall f \in A$: - $$\psi(f(X_1, \ldots, X_n)) = f(\psi(x_1), \ldots, \psi(x_n))= f(a_1, \ldots, a_n)$$ + Which is the natural evaluation map $f(X_1, \ldots, X_n) \longrightarrow f(a_1, \ldots, a_n)$. + \vspace{0.2cm} + + Since $\phi$ is a $k$-algebra homomorphism, then $\forall f \in A$: + $$\phi(f(X_1, \ldots, X_n)) = f(\phi(x_1), \ldots, \phi(x_n))= f(a_1, \ldots, a_n)$$ Thus there is a one-to-one correspondence: