weak Nullstellensatz: expand on X_i-a_i \in m
arnaucube git@arnaucube.com
Wed, 12 Aug 2026 20:18:21 +0200
2 files changed,
20 insertions(+),
6 deletions(-)
M
commutative-algebra-notes.tex
→
commutative-algebra-notes.tex
@@ -1888,22 +1888,36 @@ And since $k$ is algebraically closed $\Longrightarrow~ \frac{A}{m}\cong k$.
Let $$\pi:A\longrightarrow \frac{A}{m}$$ -be the quotient map, and let +be the quotient map. By definition, $\pi$ is the surjective homomorphism that sends each polynomial to its coset modulo $m$, and the kernel of this map is exactly $ker(\pi)=m$. + +By Zariski's lemma, $\frac{A}{m}$ is a finite field extension of $k$, and since $k$ is algebraically closed, by Zariski's lemma, this extension must be $k$ itself; denote this relation by $$\theta:\frac{A}{m}\stackrel{iso}{\longrightarrow} k$$ -be the $k$-algebra isomorphism. +the $k$-algebra isomorphism. -Define +Define the composite map $$\phi=\theta\circ\pi:A\longrightarrow k.$$ +which is a $k$-algebra homomorphism. Thus, $\forall~ i\in[n]$, define $$a_i=\phi(X_i)\in k.$$ -Since $\theta$ is injective, +Since $\phi$ is a $k$-algebra homomorphism, it must map any scalar $c \in k$ to itself, ie. $\phi(c) = c$. Therefore +$$\phi(X_i - a_i) = \phi(X_i) - \phi(a_i) = a_i - a_i = 0$$ + +Since $\phi = \theta \circ \pi$, and $\theta$ is an isomorphism (by definition injective), the only way for $\phi(f)$ to be $0$ is if $\pi(f)=0$: \begin{align*} - \phi(X_i-a_i)=0 + &\phi(X_i-a_i)=\theta(\pi(X_i - a_i)) = 0\\ &\Longrightarrow \pi(X_i-a_i)=0\\ - &\Longrightarrow X_i-a_i\in m. \end{align*} + +Since $ker(\pi)=m$, any element that maps to $0$ under $\pi$ must belong to $m$, thus +$$\pi(X_i - a_i) =0 ~~\Longrightarrow~ X_i-a_i\in m$$ + +Alternative way: by definition of a quotient ring, and elements of $\frac{A}{m}$ are cosets of the form $f+m$. $\pi(x_i)$ sends $X_i$ to the coset $X_i+m$, ie. $\pi(x_i)=X_i+m$. Thus, if $a_i$ is the image of $X_i$, then +$$X_i \equiv a_i \pmod m,$$ +which by the definition of congruence modulo ideal, this means $X_i -a_i \in m$. + +\vspace{0.5cm} Since $X_i - a_i \in m ~~\Longrightarrow~~ J=(X_1 - a_1, \ldots, X_n -a_n) \subseteq m$,