arnaucube
arnaucube/mathPublic Self-hosted repository
add intuition and key ideas on Localization and rings of fractions
arnaucube git@arnaucube.com
Mon, 31 Aug 2026 17:23:23 +0200
commit

eea444b10f8dad6267fe662c0f8ca936cfe88c03

parent

da65759f0b732e5f6be11bc2edeaa908bb3ce5ba

2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

jump to
M commutative-algebra-notes.tex → commutative-algebra-notes.tex

@@ -2060,6 +2060,34 @@

\section{Rings of fractions $S^{-1}A$ and localization} +\subsection{Small recap} +\paragraph{principal ideal:} generated by a single element, ie. for $a \in A$, $(a)=aA=\{ra ~|~ r\in A\}$. + +\paragraph{unit:} $u \in A$ is a unit if $\exists v \in A$ with $uv=1$. + +\paragraph{proper ideal:} $I \subsetneq A$, equivalently $1 \not\in I$. Therefore, a proper ideal does not have units. + +\paragraph{maximal ideal:} +$\mM \subset A$ ($A$ ring) with $m \neq A$ and there is no ideal $I$ strictly between $\mM$ and $A$. ie. if $\mM$ maximal and $\mM \subseteq I \subseteq A$, either $\mM=I$ or $I=A$. +\begin{itemize} + \item is proper + \item for $m$ maximal ideal, $\frac{A}{m}$ is a field. + \item every maximal ideal is prime + \item elements of a maximal ideal are always non-units\\ + \hspace*{2em} since if $x \in m$ were a unit, then $1=x^{-1}x \in m$, a contradiction since if $1 \in m$ then $m=A$, which would mean that it is not proper; and it is maximal, hence proper. +\end{itemize} + +\paragraph{prime ideal:} proper ideal $P$ such that +$$ab \in P ~~\Longrightarrow~ a \in P ~\text{or}~ b \in P$$ +for $P$ prime, $\frac{A}{P}$ is an integral domain. + +\paragraph{Spec(A):} prime spectrum, $Spec(A)=\{ P \subset A ~|~ P ~\text{is prime}\}$ + + +\vspace{0.6cm} + + + \subsection{Rings of fractions $S^{-1}A$} \begin{defn}{6.1}[ring of fractions] \label{def.6.1}

@@ -2091,10 +2119,6 @@ is a ring homomorphism.

\end{enumerate} \end{prop} -\begin{eg}{ } - TODO -\end{eg} - \begin{lemma}{6.2} \label{6.2} For $f \in A$, write $S = \{ 1, f, f^2, \ldots \}$, and $A_f \cong S^{-1}A$.

@@ -2102,6 +2126,7 @@ Then

$$A_f \cong \frac{A[X]}{(Xf-1)}$$ \end{lemma} \begin{proof} + (adjoining a variable $X$ and imposing $Xf=1$ is the algebraic way of saying "add $f^{-1}$".)\\ Define the homomorphism \begin{align*} \psi: A[X] &\longrightarrow A_f\\

@@ -2320,6 +2345,44 @@ $$ T^{-1}(A/I) = S^{-1}(A/I) \cong \frac{S^{-1}A}{S^{-1}I}$$

it's easy to see that this is a ring homomorphism. \end{proof} % TODO 6.6 (proposition and corollary) + + +\vspace{1.0cm} +\subsection{Key ideas} +Main idea: make some choosen elements invertible. + +For localization, it is important to not get confused between "localization at an element" and "localization at a prime ideal". + +\paragraph{Localization at an element $f$.} + +Let $S=\{1, f, f^2, f^3, \ldots \}$ a multiplicative set. Then $S^{-1}A$ is the ring of fractions, and +$$A_f= S^{-1}A = A \big[ \frac{1}{f} \big] = \{\frac{a}{f^n} ~|~ a \in A, n \geq 0\}$$ + +ie. "make $f$ invertible", then $\frac{1}{f} \in A_f$.\\ +$\Longrightarrow~ A_f$ is the ring obtained from $A$ by making every $f \in S$ invertible. + +Lemma \ref{6.2} will show that $A_f \cong \frac{A[X]}{(Xf-1)}$. + +\paragraph{Localization at a prime ideal P.} + +For $P \in Spec(A)$ (ie. $P$ is a prime ideal), + +$$A_P = ( \underbrace{A \setminus P}_{S} )^{-1} A = \{ \frac{a}{s} ~|~ a \in A, s \not\in P \}$$ + +ie. "make every element of $A$ not in $P$ invertible". Since $p \in P$, then $\frac{1}{p} \not\in A_P$.\\ + +Given the ideal $I \subseteq A$, its extension to the localized ring is +$$I A_P = \{ \frac{a}{s} ~|~ a \in I, s \not\in P \}$$ + +\vspace{0.6cm} + +The only nonunits are fractions whose numerator lies in $P$: $\{ \frac{a}{s} ~|~ a \in P, s \not\in P \} = P A_P$ + +Hence, $A_P$ has one maximal ideal: $P A_P$. + +$(A_P, P A_P)$ denotes the local ring $A_P$ together with $P A_P$, often called the localization of $A$ at $P$ as a local ring. + +\vspace{1.0cm}